Re: status of rlm_python in 1.1.0 release
Ilia Chipitsine wrote: When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ? The module rlm_python is still experimental. There are known issues with this module. http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227 in the end of that discussion there's rewritten rlm_python.c if existing rlm_python is buggy why not to use better version ? -- Nicolas Baradakis - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: status of rlm_python in 1.1.0 release
Ilia Chipitsine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if existing rlm_python is buggy why not to use better version ? Because the primary FreeRADIUS developers don't use python. Please use the updated module yourself, and if it works for you, email the list and say so. If no one says that the new module is better, it won't go in. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: status of rlm_python in 1.1.0 release
Ilia Chipitsine wrote: When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ? The module rlm_python is still experimental. There are known issues with this module. http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227 -- Nicolas Baradakis - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html