[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 22:31 --- Subject: Bug 35138 Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 13 22:30:43 2008 New Revision: 132298 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132298 Log: PR c++/35138 * parser.c (cp_parser_pseudo_destructor_name): If next tokens are not identifier :: ~, return before calling cp_parser_type_name. * g++.dg/template/member8.C: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/member8.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138
[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 22:32 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138
[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 20:14 --- Posted 3 alternative patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00410.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00418.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00422.html -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2008-02-08 16:11:14 |2008-02-12 20:14:24 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138
[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-11 23:11 --- cp_parser_class_name since PR20293 errors unconditionally even during tentative parse. Mark, is there a way to get a silent tentative parse of the optional nested name specifier plus typename? Or is trying to parse it tentatively as pseudo-dtor followed by parsing it as id-expression/member access if the former just never going to work? -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138
[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-08 16:11 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords||rejects-valid Known to fail||4.3.0 Known to work||4.1.2 4.2.2 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-02-08 16:11:14 date|| Summary|g++ rejects valid code |[4.3 Regression] g++ rejects ||valid code Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138
[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-08 22:15 --- This is worse than PR32384, so either we have a fix for it or we should revert the fix for PR32384 before 4.3.0. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||32384 nThis|| Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138
[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-08 17:58 --- Caused by my http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129836 This is during tentative parse, so I guess the errors should be suppressed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138
[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code
--- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-02-08 21:51 --- This should get higher priority than P3... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138