[Bug c++/63809] Missing warning on extra template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63809 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Dup of bug 24314. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 24314 ***
[Bug c++/63809] Missing warning on extra template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63809
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
template
struct binary_traits{};
template <>
template
struct binary_traits
{
typedef int result_type;
};
- CUT
This is rejected since GCC 8 with:
:6:8: error: too many template-parameter-lists
struct binary_traits
^
I suspect there is a dup now.
[Bug c++/63809] Missing warning on extra template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63809 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Mikhail Maltsev --- *** Bug 66941 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/63809] Missing warning on extra template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63809 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Sorokin --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #0) > g++ fails to warn about the extra parameter list. clang does warn, see > PR63750. Why is it a warning? Isn't this code incorrect? I can not find anything in [temp.expl.spec] that forbid a code like this, but I can not find anything that assign a specific meaning to this code either. At least one compiler (MSVC) rejects this code with an error.
[Bug c++/63809] Missing warning on extra template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63809 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- *** Bug 67190 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/63809] Missing warning on extra template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63809 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2014-12-08 CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1
