[Bug middle-end/63197] tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning "array subscript is below array bounds"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- No, it appears the bug has been fixed.
[Bug middle-end/63197] tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning "array subscript is below array bounds"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jan-Benedict Glaw from comment #2) > With today's binutils snapshot, there's a gas_assert in front of it, which > silences this bogus warning. That needs to be reverted to test GCC wrt. this > issue. Is it still there now?
[Bug middle-end/63197] tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning array subscript is below array bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197 --- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de --- With today's binutils snapshot, there's a gas_assert in front of it, which silences this bogus warning. That needs to be reverted to test GCC wrt. this issue.
[Bug middle-end/63197] tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning array subscript is below array bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 33533 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33533action=edit reduced testcase
[Bug middle-end/63197] tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning array subscript is below array bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2014-09-22 Host||x86_64-linux Ever confirmed|0 |1 Build||x86_64-linux
[Bug middle-end/63197] tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning array subscript is below array bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.9.1 |5.0 --- Comment #1 from Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Just reconfigmed r215001 to show this behavior.
