[Bug target/84295] [7 Regression] glibc failed to build

2018-02-09 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84295

Andreas Krebbel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel  ---
GCC 7 backport:

https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=257523

[Bug target/84295] [7 Regression] glibc failed to build

2018-02-09 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84295

Andreas Krebbel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel  ---
Fixed with:

2018-02-09  Andreas Krebbel  

PR target/PR84295
* config/s390/s390.c (s390_set_current_function): Invoke
s390_indirect_branch_settings also if fndecl didn't change.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2018-02-09  Andreas Krebbel  

PR target/PR84295
* gcc.target/s390/pr84295.c: New test.

[Bug target/84295] [7 Regression] glibc failed to build

2018-02-09 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84295

Andreas Krebbel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2018-02-09
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel  ---
I'm testing the following fix:

index 62a60e2..298fdd1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.c
+++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.c
@@ -16135,7 +16135,10 @@ s390_set_current_function (tree fndecl)
  several times in the course of compiling a function, and we don't want to
  slow things down too much or call target_reinit when it isn't safe.  */
   if (fndecl == s390_previous_fndecl)
-return;
+{
+  s390_indirect_branch_settings (fndecl);
+  return;
+}

   tree old_tree;
   if (s390_previous_fndecl == NULL_TREE)

[Bug target/84295] [7 Regression] glibc failed to build

2018-02-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84295

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1
   Target Milestone|--- |7.4