[Bug testsuite/85911] [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Fixed.
[Bug testsuite/85911] [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri May 25 10:39:35 2018 New Revision: 260748 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260748&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix a test-case (PR testsuite/85911). 2018-05-25 Martin Liska PR testsuite/85911 * gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c: Do not scan for 'Removing basic block'. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c
[Bug testsuite/85911] [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
[Bug testsuite/85911] [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 85913 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug testsuite/85911] [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0
[Bug testsuite/85911] [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2018-05-24 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- As I've mentioned several times in this thread https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg01342.html the scan-tree-dump* tests were UNSUPPORTED before my patch because they hadn't been updated to look for the changed dumpfile name. Now that this is fixed, the new FAIL is exposed.