[Bug testsuite/98676] [11 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c etc. FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Summary|gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c |[11 Regression] |etc. FAIL |gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c ||etc. FAIL
[Bug testsuite/98676] [11 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c etc. FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 49966 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49966&action=edit A patch STV is disabled by /* Disable STV if -mpreferred-stack-boundary={2,3} or -mincoming-stack-boundary={2,3} or -mstackrealign - the needed stack realignment will be extra cost the pass doesn't take into account and the pass can't realign the stack. */ if (ix86_preferred_stack_boundary < 128 || ix86_incoming_stack_boundary < 128 || opts->x_ix86_force_align_arg_pointer) opts->x_target_flags &= ~MASK_STV; Please try this.
[Bug testsuite/98676] [11 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c etc. FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- > Created attachment 49966 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49966&action=edit > A patch > > STV is disabled by [...] > Please try this. Successfully tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 (both 32 and 64-bit). Thanks.
[Bug testsuite/98676] [11 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c etc. FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a512079ef40e442c1269ea1cc55f18790ba68449 commit r11-6669-ga512079ef40e442c1269ea1cc55f18790ba68449 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Jan 14 06:56:17 2021 -0800 i386: Update PR target/95021 tests Also pass -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4 -mno-stackrealign to avoid disabling STV by: /* Disable STV if -mpreferred-stack-boundary={2,3} or -mincoming-stack-boundary={2,3} or -mstackrealign - the needed stack realignment will be extra cost the pass doesn't take into account and the pass can't realign the stack. */ if (ix86_preferred_stack_boundary < 128 || ix86_incoming_stack_boundary < 128 || opts->x_ix86_force_align_arg_pointer) opts->x_target_flags &= ~MASK_STV; PR target/98676 * gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c: Add -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4 -mno-stackrealign. * gcc.target/i386/pr95021-3.c: Likewise.
[Bug testsuite/98676] [11 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c etc. FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed.