Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
On 7/2/2013 11:31 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote: > I think that would be better to merge the content into single > 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection. But I have no idea about the order of those > two items. Perhaps you or Sriraman can make the decision for the > change? :-) Hi, thanks for pointing! I think order of bullets doesn't matter too much. Fixed as obvious. Thanks, K
Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
2013/6/25 Kirill Yukhin : > Hello, >> >> Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...". > Checked int www CVS. > > Thanks, K Hi, Kirill, By reviewing webpage of gcc-4.9 changes: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html I noticed there is a duplicate subsection 'IA-32/x86-64' under "New Targets and Target Specific Improvements". According to the cvs log of changes.html, it is caused by revision 1.19 that created another 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection. === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19 --- wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 2013/06/24 22:06:53 1.18 +++ wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 2013/06/25 08:05:13 1.19 @@ -175,6 +175,13 @@ New Targets and Target Specific Improvements +IA-32/x86-64 + + GCC now supports the new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont + through -march=slm. + + + IA-32/x86-64 It is now possible to call x86 intrinsics from select functions in I think that would be better to merge the content into single 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection. But I have no idea about the order of those two items. Perhaps you or Sriraman can make the decision for the change? :-) Best regards, jasonwucj
Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
Hello, > > Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...". Checked int www CVS. Thanks, K
Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Igor Zamyatin wrote: > This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the > gcc-4.9/changes.html page. Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...". Thanks, Gerald
Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
Ping? On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Igor Zamyatin wrote: > Hi! > > This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the > gcc-4.9/changes.html page. > > OK to install? > > Thanks, > Igor > > Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html > === > RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v > retrieving revision 1.17 > diff -c -1 -r1.17 changes.html > *** htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 6 Jun 2013 11:15:24 - 1.17 > --- htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 10 Jun 2013 10:11:24 - > *** > *** 177,178 > --- 177,185 > > + IA-32/x86-64 > + > + GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont > + through -march=slm. > + > + > + > RX
Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
Igor Zamyatin wrote:
+ GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
+ through -march=slm.
Not related to the release notes, but I think it should also be added to
gcc/doc/invoke.texi's "@item -march=@var{cpu-type}" - presumably after
the item:
@item atom
Intel Atom CPU with 64-bit extensions, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 and SSSE3
instruction set support.
Tobias
[Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
Hi! This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the gcc-4.9/changes.html page. OK to install? Thanks, Igor Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -c -1 -r1.17 changes.html *** htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 6 Jun 2013 11:15:24 - 1.17 --- htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 10 Jun 2013 10:11:24 - *** *** 177,178 --- 177,185 + IA-32/x86-64 + + GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont + through -march=slm. + + + RX
