Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3707: syscall_emul: return -errno on a failed close call
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3707/#review9084 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Tony Gutierrez On Nov. 16, 2016, 8:25 a.m., Brandon Potter wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3707/ > --- > > (Updated Nov. 16, 2016, 8:25 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > --- > > Changeset 11727:e576e1bd7cd6 > --- > syscall_emul: return -errno on a failed close call > > > Diffs > - > > src/sim/syscall_emul.cc c38fcdaa5fe508dbb18cc084e758ad0ce8e2e2f4 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3707/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Brandon Potter > > ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3707: syscall_emul: return -errno on a failed close call
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3707/#review9090 --- Ship it! BTW, how are you finding all these bugs? Do you have some test suite you're running which exercises all of these syscalls? - Jason Lowe-Power On Nov. 16, 2016, 4:25 p.m., Brandon Potter wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3707/ > --- > > (Updated Nov. 16, 2016, 4:25 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > --- > > Changeset 11727:e576e1bd7cd6 > --- > syscall_emul: return -errno on a failed close call > > > Diffs > - > > src/sim/syscall_emul.cc c38fcdaa5fe508dbb18cc084e758ad0ce8e2e2f4 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3707/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Brandon Potter > > ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3707: syscall_emul: return -errno on a failed close call
> On Nov. 16, 2016, 6:19 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > BTW, how are you finding all these bugs? Do you have some test suite you're > > running which exercises all of these syscalls? No, I don't have a test suite for it. It's not really a bug in that it wouldn't do the "right" thing either; it's just that we have the convention or returning -errno for failed system calls. I don't know why it was missing from the code in the first place. - Brandon --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3707/#review9090 --- On Nov. 16, 2016, 4:25 p.m., Brandon Potter wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3707/ > --- > > (Updated Nov. 16, 2016, 4:25 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > --- > > Changeset 11727:e576e1bd7cd6 > --- > syscall_emul: return -errno on a failed close call > > > Diffs > - > > src/sim/syscall_emul.cc c38fcdaa5fe508dbb18cc084e758ad0ce8e2e2f4 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3707/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Brandon Potter > > ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev