BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

[gump]

Dear Gumpmeisters,

The following 1 notifys should have been sent

*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project authx-core (in module authx) failed
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project authx-core (in module authx) failed
To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project authx-core has an issue affecting its community integration.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Update Failed'.

Full details are available at:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/authx/authx-core/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were 
provided:
 -DEBUG- Sole output [authx-core-19012006.jar] identifier set to project name
 -DEBUG- Dependency on packaged-jmock exists, no need to add for property 
maven.jar.jmock.
 -INFO- Failed with reason update failed
 -DEBUG- Extracted fallback artifacts from Gump Repository

To subscribe to this information via syndicated feeds:
- RSS: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/authx/authx-core/rss.xml
- Atom: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/authx/authx-core/atom.xml

== Gump Tracking Only ===
Produced by Gump version 2.2.
Gump Run 15001619012006, vmgump.apache.org:vmgump-public:15001619012006
Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #1.


--
Apache Gump
http://gump.apache.org/ [Instance: vmgump]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

[gump]

Dear Gumpmeisters,

The following 1 notifys should have been sent

*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project authx-core (in module authx) failed
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project authx-core (in module authx) failed
To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project authx-core has an issue affecting its community integration.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Update Failed'.

Full details are available at:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/authx/authx-core/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were 
provided:
 -DEBUG- Sole output [authx-core-19012006.jar] identifier set to project name
 -DEBUG- Dependency on packaged-jmock exists, no need to add for property 
maven.jar.jmock.
 -INFO- Failed with reason update failed
 -DEBUG- Extracted fallback artifacts from Gump Repository

To subscribe to this information via syndicated feeds:
- RSS: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/authx/authx-core/rss.xml
- Atom: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/authx/authx-core/atom.xml

== Gump Tracking Only ===
Produced by Gump version 2.2.
Gump Run 15001619012006, vmgump.apache.org:vmgump-public:15001619012006
Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #1.


--
Apache Gump
http://gump.apache.org/ [Instance: vmgump]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Regarding gump failure of db-ojb and db-ojb-from-packages

[Thomas Dudziak]

On 1/19/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I hope 2.7.6 is going to work as well 8-)

Think that won't be a problem. And even if, then I'll update OJB to use 2.7.6.

Tom

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project packaged-jmock (in module cocoon) failed

[Stefan Bodewig]

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Jörg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I wonder why so many projects depend on *our* packaged jmock.

Ahh, for historical reasons.

I was experimenting with building jmock and it simply will never work
(a backwards incomatible change in JUnit in the dead 3.8.x branch made
after the release of 3.8.1 together with a very very very old version
of ASM being required).

As a stopgap I made Cocoon depend on its own version of jmock again,
so you could build.  Then excalibur needed jmock and I simply reused
your version instead of installing it separately.  In fact the huge
number of projects stems from excalibur not building (transitive
dependencies).

> At least Cocoon has removed it from its repository and it must
> probably fixed/added somewhere else now

Done.

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help for WSRP4J

[Stefan Bodewig]

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We are now back to an old error during the build wrt to some Axis
> classes. I have absolutely no clue what might be wrong there.
> 
> Can anyone help, please?

Sure.  Unfortunately we seem to be investigating this about half a
year too late.



of August 1st is a backwards incompatible change that breaks wsrp, and
from what I can tell this change went into Axis 1.3:



This means wsrp's trunk version works with Axis 1.2 but not 1.3
(released a few months ago).  If you fix it, it won't work with 1.2
anymore.

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Regarding gump failure of db-ojb and db-ojb-from-packages

[Martin van den Bemt]

Thanx Stefan :)

Mvgr,
Martin

Stefan Bodewig wrote:

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



these builds are failing because OJB needs Antlr version 2.7.5
whereas gump still uses 2.7.3. Is there any chance that gump could
also provide the newer antlr version ?



I hope 2.7.6 is going to work as well 8-)

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Regarding gump failure of db-ojb and db-ojb-from-packages

[Stefan Bodewig]

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> these builds are failing because OJB needs Antlr version 2.7.5
> whereas gump still uses 2.7.3. Is there any chance that gump could
> also provide the newer antlr version ?

I hope 2.7.6 is going to work as well 8-)

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project packaged-jmock (in module cocoon) failed

[Jörg Heinicke]

> Von: Gump 
> Datum: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:03:53 PST
> 
> Project packaged-jmock has an issue affecting its community integration.
> This issue affects 147 projects,
>  and has been outstanding for 2 runs.

I wonder why so many projects depend on *our* packaged jmock. At least
Cocoon has removed it from its repository and it must probably fixed/added
somewhere else now (besides the fact that we need to remove it from our gump
descriptor).

Jörg

-- 
Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Regarding gump failure of db-ojb and db-ojb-from-packages

[Martin van den Bemt]

If you can wait till the weekend, I'll see if I can have a go at it..
Also with fixed dependencies we try to use the latest versions..

Mvgr,
Martin

Thomas Dudziak wrote:

Hi,

these builds are failing because OJB needs Antlr version 2.7.5 whereas
gump still uses 2.7.3. Is there any chance that gump could also
provide the newer antlr version ?

regards,
Tom

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help for WSRP4J

[Carsten Ziegeler]

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Bill Barker wrote:
> 
>>The current Gump Pluto is built from pluto/branches/pluto-1.0.2. 
> 
> Ah, great.
> 
> 
>>I haven't looked into it enough to see why it isn't good enough
>>for ws4p4j.
>>
> 
> Another dependency to the pluto-portal was missing. I just added it. So
> let's way for the next run :)
> 
Ok, now it looks a little bit better. We are now back to an old error
during the build wrt to some Axis classes. I have absolutely no clue
what might be wrong there.

Can anyone help, please?

Thanks
Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help for WSRP4J

[Carsten Ziegeler]

Bill Barker wrote:
> 
> The current Gump Pluto is built from pluto/branches/pluto-1.0.2. 
Ah, great.

> I haven't looked into it enough to see why it isn't good enough
> for ws4p4j.
> 
Another dependency to the pluto-portal was missing. I just added it. So
let's way for the next run :)

Thanks!
Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]