Re: [VOTE] Accept CloudBerry into the ASF Incubator

[Francois Papon]

+1 (binding)

Looks very nice!

If you are missing some mentor, I would me more than happy to help.

regards,

François
fpa...@apache.org
francois.pa...@openobject.fr

Le 04/10/2024 à 02:10, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit :

Hi folks,

Following the discussion about CloudBerry
(https://lists.apache.org/thread/1f8jwpjnn430bhsjq98qxlgjojpqrfdh),
and after seeing a few updates to the proposal, I would like to
start the formal vote to accept CloudBerry into the ASF Incubator.

As reminder, this is the CloudBerry Proposal:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CloudberryProposal

Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1, accept CloudBerry into the ASF Incubator
[ ] 0, I don't care either way
[ ] -1, do not accept CloudBerry into the ASF Incubator, because ...

The vote will run for one week starting from today.

Thanks,
Roman.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

[Francois Papon]

Hi,

I don't see the problem with people that contribute to a project without 
writing source code, as I know we already have these kind of people in 
ASF projects.


Just for my information, do we have some numbers about the min 
contributors on a project and initial committers to be accepted in the 
incubator?


May be it can help new project and people who wants to make a proposal 
to have an idea if their proposition could be accepted or not.


regards,

François

On 31/07/2024 14:07, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

Hi Justin,

Thanks for your email. Much appreciated!

I agree with the requirements to join the incubator, I share the same vision.

The codebase is there, public, under the Apache license. So, I think
we are good here :)

About the community, it's a small one, but present, vibrant, and eager
to grow. We have a lot of enthusiasm around this proposal (and also
Polaris open source). I think it would be a great podling.

The split between PPMC / ocmmitters is unusual because of the
community build goal. The team had a lot of feedback and interest from
different parties, including some Apache projects.
When I prepared the proposal with the team (that included people
listed in the PPMC), we wanted to involve anyone helping the project
to grow. It's not necessary code contributions, it's everything to:
1. Help in the design (for instance Jack Ye is helping on the Apache
Iceberg REST impl vision)
2. Help to grow the community by including other communities (for
instance Anoop proposed to bridge with Apache XTable, John with Apache
Kafka, Robert with Project Nessie)
3. Mentor committers and other PPMC (that's my role mostly :)) in
addition of the regular mentor. For instance, Tyler could be a great
mentor thanks to his experience on Apache Beam.

So about the commits:
- Polaris started on a private repo at Snowflake including code that
it was not possible to push open source (Snowflake specific). So, we
had to change the history to remove these commits and have a clean
open source codebase
- You are right, not all PPMC members have committed on the repo, same
about the committers. The reason they are there is that either:
1. Their contributions are not code
2. Their contributions are not yet there, but they plan to contribute
I think it happens pretty often to have people listed in the initial
committers without commit (for instance, I think on Gravitino, Ashish
Singh is on the initial committer list without a commit afair).

I understand your comment, and it's important to me.
If it's a concern for you, I'm happy to rework the initial committer
list with the team (also removing PPMC list to use the default layout)
and grow the PPMC/committers when in the incubator.

Thoughts ?

Regards
JB

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:47 AM Justin Mclean  wrote:

Hi,

In general, projects joining the incubator need two things:
- A codebase
- a community around it

While this isn't a hard requirement, building either while in incubation can be 
difficult.

The first issue I see is it’s not clear to me that there is a community here.

The split between PPMC / committers is also unusual.

It also seems there’s a disconnect between the people who have contributed to 
the project and those on the initial PMC/committer list. I understand history 
has been lost. Is there any reason why history wasn’t preserved? But given it 
comes from a single vendor, I would assume that the commits in the new repo 
would then give an accurate representation of who is involved from outside that 
vendor since the plan/announcement to make it open source. However looking at 
the commits, 80%+ of the people involved come from that single vendor which and 
most of the proposed PPMC/committers have no activity in the project. How have 
these people contributed?

Looking closer, other than jbonofre or snazy, I can see these commits from 
non-Snowflake people, and that is it.
anoopj - 1 commit (fixing a basic typo)
ajantha-bhat - 2 commits (minor doc changes)

 From the information provided, it seems that a lot of the proposed PMCs have 
not been involved with the project at all. Mentors are there to help a project, 
adding extra existing PMC members to the PPMC to just help out is also rather 
unusual. So both the PPMC/committer split and the composition seem problematic 
to me.

Kind Regards,
Justin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenServerless Proposal to the incubator

[Francois Papon]

Hi,

We need to ask for a search about the project name, more information 
about the naming process are available here:


https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming

regards,

François

On 27/05/2024 16:56, Michele Sciabarra wrote:

Hello, I do not know if it is possible to have 2 champions, but if it is, I
will happily accept both Enrico and Jean-Baptise as Champions, and also
Francois as a mentor.

I updated the serverless proposal accordingly.

I would ask: how can we check if the OpenServerless project name is
suitable? Looks like the Serverless word is a trademark of Serverless Inc,
the makers of the Serverless Framework.

What are the next steps?

Thanks!



Michele Sciabarra | CEO

m: +44 747 984 8388
e:  mich...@nuvolaris.io
l:   https://linkedin.com/in/msciab
Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street , Wilmington DE
www.nuvolaris.io   [image: linkedin icon]
 [image: youtube icon]
 [image: twitter icon]



On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 13:10, Enrico Olivelli  wrote:


Thanks for the proposal.
I confirm that I will be happy to help as mentor and champion

Enrico

Il Lun 27 Mag 2024, 11:45 Michele Sciabarra  ha
scritto:


Thanks, I fixed it. Also since the code is spread among many

repositories I

added more contribution graphs.
Also I thought it worth to mention the project "Fantacalcio" built on top
of  Nuvolaris  with many contributors.


Michele Sciabarra | CEO

m: +44 747 984 8388
e:  mich...@nuvolaris.io
l:   https://linkedin.com/in/msciab
Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street , Wilmington DE
www.nuvolaris.io   [image: linkedin icon]
 [image: youtube icon]
 [image: twitter icon]



On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 10:36, tison  wrote:


The contributor graph link seems incorrectly link to Apache Openwhisk.


Contribution Graphs:

https://github.com/openwhisk/openwhisk/graphs/contributors

Best,
tison.


Michele Sciabarra  于2024年5月27日周一 17:28写道：


Hi Jean-Baptiste,

Yes, we are looking for a champion, and our mentor Enrico Olivelli
suggested we just ask on the channel.

If you are available I will readily accept.


Michele Sciabarra | CEO

m: +44 747 984 8388
e:  mich...@nuvolaris.io
l:   https://linkedin.com/in/msciab
Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street , Wilmington DE
www.nuvolaris.io   [image: linkedin icon]
 [image: youtube

icon]

 [image: twitter icon]



On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 09:33, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
wrote:


Hi Michele

I like the proposal, especially by the relationship with several

other

Apache projects.

If you look for a champion, please let me know if I can help.

Thanks !
Regards
JB

On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 9:50 PM Michele Sciabarra <

mich...@nuvolaris.io>

wrote:

Hi Apache Incubator members,

I would like to propose a new project to the ASF incubator -

OpenServerless.

OpenServerless (currently Nuvolaris Community) is a complete

Serverless

platform for Kubernetes built on top of Apache OpenWhisk, Redis,

PosgreSQL,

FerredDB, Minio, APISIX and Ollama, providing support for

back-end

and

front-end, with a rich CLI, including development tools and IDE

support,

tested on all the leading cloud kubernetes (EKS,AKS,GKE) and

Linux

distributions (OpenShift, MicroK8S, K3S).

Here is the proposal:


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/OpenServerlessProposal

I would be the Champion of the project. I will mentor and help

the

project

through the incubator with Bertrand Delacratez [

bdelacra...@apache.org

]

and

Enrico Olivelli [eolive...@apache.org]

We are open to hearing the feedback from the incubator.

[1] https://nuvolaris.github.io



-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache EventMesh (incubating) 1.4.0-rc1

[Francois Papon]

+1 (binding)

- Download links are valid.
- Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
- Source code distributions have correct names matching the current 
release.

- LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each EventMesh repo.
- All files have license headers if necessary.

regards,

François

On 24/03/2022 07:44, wqliang wrote:

Hello Incubator Community,

 This is a call for a vote to release Apache EventMesh(Incubating)
version 1.4.0-rc1

 The Apache EventMesh community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release
 Apache EventMesh(Incubating) version 1.4.0-rc1

 We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
 incubator release.

 EventMesh community vote thread:
 • https://lists.apache.org/thread/bjps9o00h0d861df56pcqodsrx8qx4po

 Vote result thread:
 • https://lists.apache.org/thread/qhlqy6hdwf6z0oq20k2ygk1w8wqh1jch

 The release candidate:
 •https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/eventmesh/1.4.0-rc1

 Git tag for the release:
 • https://github.com/apache/incubator-eventmesh/tree/v1.4.0-rc1

 Release notes:
 • https://eventmesh.apache.org/events/release-notes/v1.4.0

 The artifacts signed with PGP key
*9B907F6A8A5A781D36D94B858B497E274D237979*, corresponding to
wqli...@apache.org, that can be found in keys file:
 • https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/eventmesh/KEYS

 The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
number of votes are reached.

 Please vote accordingly:

 [ ] +1 approve
 [ ] +0 no opinion
 [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

Thanks,
On behalf of Apache EventMesh(Incubating) community



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

[Francois Papon]

+1 (binding)

regards,

Francois

On 02/12/2021 19:37, Bart Maertens wrote:

Hi Incubator Community,

After a discussion[1] with and vote by[2] the Hop community, we have
discussed Apache Hop's graduation in the general@incubator [DISCUSS]
thread[3], where no major issues were raised.

With no objections brought up in the discussion, we would like to proceed
with the voting process.

Here is the official request to vote to graduate the Apache Hop project as
a TLP.

Please provide your vote as one of the following options:

[ ] +1 - Recommend graduation of Apache Hop as a TLP

[ ]  0 - I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object

[ ] -1 - Do not recommend the graduation of Apache Hop because…

The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.

The Hop community achievements since Hop joined the Incubator in September
2020:
- over 3200 commits by 28 contributors
- 4 releases (0.60, 0.70, 0.99, 1.0)
- 5 mentors, 6 PPMC members (mentors excluded) and 8 committers (mentors
and PPMC members excluded)
- diverse committers and PPMC, with regular contributions from at least 5
different companies/institutes
- Apache Hop website[4]
- dev conversations at d...@hop.apache.org
- assessed ourselves against the Apache Project maturity matrix[5] and
didn't find any issues.


[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/470xwxw8x8qmm4fp82ckqys5zmrq9416
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8vg1nh1g707s4hhcxjtg1zdccjpjh2k
[3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/mrx8g5w1xfzx80wtg9l3mrm3q1lkh6ss
[4] https://hop.incubator.apache.org/
[5] https://hop.apache.org/community/incubator/



Establish the Apache Hop Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
related to a platform for data orchestration.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
(PMC), to be known as the "Apache Hop Project", be and hereby is
established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Hop Project be and hereby is responsible for
the creation and maintenance of software related to a platform for data
orchestration; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Hop" be and hereby
is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of
the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Hop Project, and to
have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the
scope of responsibility of the Apache Hop Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Hop Project:

* Bart Maertens 
* Brandon Jackson 
* Dave Campen 
* Francois Papon 
* Hans Van Akelyen 
* Julian Hyde 
* Kevin Ratnasekera 
* Matt Casters 
* Nicolas Adment 
* Sergio Ramazzina 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Hans Van Akelyen be
appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Hop, to serve in
accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors
and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement,
removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be
it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Hop Project be and hereby is tasked with the
migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Hop podling; and
be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
Hop podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0-rc1

[Francois Papon]

+1 (binding)

Good job!

regards,

François
fpa...@apache.org
francois.pa...@openobject.fr

Le 27/09/2021 à 08:58, Hans Van Akelyen a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> After a thorough testing period for Hop 0.99, we are ready to release
> version 1.0.0 to the public. All issues raised during the previous release
> have been resolved. Dubious code has either been rewritten or removed from
> this release.
>
> This release contains no new features, only further cleanup and code
> hardening has been done. I would like to thank everyone that participated
> in filing, testing and resolving issues.
>
> Build instructions can be found in the README included.
>
> Hop community vote and result threads:
> Vote:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r429a306535b933737fb93ea66a0d78420dc8f6abc30ce5eeb8cafd2d%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E
>
> Result:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3e0605e7006aea3c03aba7d6a00eb3a748bb6662d47ba31c8348475a%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E
>
> The tag to be voted on is 1.0.0rc1 (commit 8a1fc96 ):
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/1.0.0-rc1
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-1.0.0-incubating-rc1/
>
> The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
> Source: 
> b7e2fdf14fcacaf937bf3e4ffedba6870a0b97965c97e0be0013acde308e161035fce5dfcb5254f96194cfe7a944bcfd5b3d8541b51435f732d0a5f61e498550
>
> Client: 
> f9dd913c09a547a21e0c0c26ec71040dd34b753e83d4638982a1e5b525f4219e2e33c54989305461c793ecdd779ffab953f65872f5d809267938fd62ddf123c2
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e
>
> For more information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324323&version=12350233
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0!
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if
> a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Best Regards,
> Hans
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

[Francois Papon]

sorry I forgot the (non-binding) ;)

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 17/09/2020 à 17:59, Francois Papon a écrit :
>
> +1
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
> Le 16/09/2020 à 15:28, Matt Casters a écrit :
>> Hi Apache,
>>
>> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Hop into the Apache Incubator.
>> Please see the discussion thread [1].
>>
>> Please see the full proposal:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HopProposal
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HopProposal>
>> Please cast your vote
>>
>>         [ ] +1 Accept Hop into the Incubator
>>         [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Hop
>>         [ ] -1 Do not accept Hop because …
>>
>> The vote will be open at least for 72 hours.
>>
>> Incubator PMC member votes are binding. Everyone else is welcomed to
>> vote too
>> (mark them as non-binding if you can)!    
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your time.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matt
>>
>> [1]
>> http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Hop-proposal-td68232.html
>> <http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Hop-proposal-td68232.html>
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

[Francois Papon]

+1

regards,

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 16/09/2020 à 15:28, Matt Casters a écrit :
> Hi Apache,
>
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Hop into the Apache Incubator.
> Please see the discussion thread [1].
>
> Please see the full proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HopProposal
> 
> Please cast your vote
>
>         [ ] +1 Accept Hop into the Incubator
>         [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Hop
>         [ ] -1 Do not accept Hop because …
>
> The vote will be open at least for 72 hours.
>
> Incubator PMC member votes are binding. Everyone else is welcomed to
> vote too
> (mark them as non-binding if you can)!    
>
> Thanks in advance for your time.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>
> [1]
> http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Hop-proposal-td68232.html
> 
>
>