Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

2016-09-28 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
+1 (binding)

Best Regards,
Nandana

On Tuesday, September 27, 2016, Ate Douma  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended,
> please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The ASF voting rules are described at:
>http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote
> for which only Incubator PMC member votes are binding.
>
> Votes from other people are also welcome as an indication of peoples
> enthusiasm (or lack thereof).
>
> Please do not use this VOTE thread for discussions.
> If needed, start a new thread instead.
>
> This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows
> [] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator because ...
>
>
> The proposal is listed below, but you can also access it on the wiki:
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ate.
>
> == Abstract ==
>
> NetBeans is an open source development environment, tooling platform, and
> application framework, used by 1.5 million individuals each month.
>
> == Proposal ==
> Apache NetBeans will continue to focus on the areas it has focused on while
> sponsored by Sun Microsystems and Oracle. It will continue to primarily
> focus on
> providing tools for the Java ecosystem, while also being focused on tools
> for
> other ecosystems, languages and technologies, such as JavaScript, PHP, and
> C/C++. It will continue to actively support its community by means of
> mailing
> lists, tutorials, and documentation.
>
> == Background ==
> NetBeans started in 1995/96 in Prague, in the Czech Republic, as a student
> project. Sun Microsystems acquired and open sourced it in 2000 and, with
> the
> acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle in 2010, became part of Oracle.
> Throughout its history in Sun Microsystems and Oracle, NetBeans has been
> free
> and open source and has been leveraged by its sponsor as a mechanism for
> driving
> the Java ecosystem forward.
>
> == Rationale ==
> Although NetBeans is already open source, moving it to a neutral place like
> Apache, with its strong governance model, is expected to help get more
> contributions from various organizations. For example, large companies are
> using
> NetBeans as an application framework to build internal or commercial
> applications and are much more likely to contribute to it once it moves to
> neutral Apache ground. At the same time, though Oracle will relinquish its
> control over NetBeans, individual contributors from Oracle are expected to
> continue contributing to NetBeans after it has been contributed to Apache,
> together with individual contributors from other organizations, as well as
> self-employed individual contributors.
>
> == Initial Goals ==
> The initial goals of the NetBeans contribution under the Apache umbrella
> are to
> establish a new home for an already fully functioning project and to open
> up the
> governance model so as to simplify and streamline contributions from the
> community.
>
> == Current Status ==
> Meritocracy: NetBeans has been run by Oracle, with the majority of code
> contributions coming from Oracle. The specific reason for moving to Apache
> is to
> expand the diversity of contributors and to increase the level of
> meritocracy in
> NetBeans. Apache NetBeans will be actively seeking new contributors and
> will
> welcome them warmly and provide a friendly and productive environment for
> purposes of providing a development environment, tooling environment, and
> application framework.
>
> Community: NetBeans has approximately 1.5 million active users around
> the
> world, in extremely diverse structures and organizations. NetBeans is used
> by
> teachers and instructors at schools and universities to teach Java and
> other
> languages. It is used by students as an educational tool. It is used by
> large
> organizations who base their software on the application framework beneath
> NetBeans. It is used by web developers for creating web sites and by
> developers
> using a range of tools, languages, and technologies to be productive and
> efficient software developers.
>
> Core Developers: The core developers will come from a range of
> organizations, including Oracle, which will continue its investment in
> NetBeans.
>
> Alignment: The application framework is the basis of a range of mission
> critical scientific software at large organizations in defense, aerospace,
> logistics, and research, such as at Boeing, Airbus Defense and Space,
> NASA, and
> NATO.
>
> == Known Risks ==
> Orphaned Products: The community proposing NetBeans for incubation is
> strong
> and vibrant. The size and diversity of the community is a guarantee
> against the
> project being orphaned.
>
> Inexperience with Open Source: NetBeans has been free and open source
> since
> the early days of its sp

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Marmotta as TLP

2013-11-04 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
+1

Best Regards,
Nandana

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Jakob Frank  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> the Marmotta podling, whose goal is to provide an Open Platform for
> Linked Data, entered incubation in December 2012. Since then, the
> codebase has stabilized and two releases were published following ASF
> policies and guidelines.
> The community has grown, two new committers have joined the development
> team and more people joined the mailing lists.
>
> The last incubator report lists Marmotta as "Ready to graduate" [1], the
> Marmotta community has decided to take this step [2] and agreed on a
> Graduation Resolution Draft [3] which is also attached below.
>
> The resolution draft was posted to general@incubator.a.o for discussion
> [4] and raised no concerns, now please cast your votes:
>
> [ ]  +1 Graduate the Marmotta podling from Incubator
> [ ]  +0 Indifferent to graduation status of the Marmotta podling
> [ ]  -1 Reject graduation of the Marmotta podling from Incubator because...
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting now.
>
>
> Best,
> Jakob
> on behalf of the Marmotta community
>
> [1] <http://s.apache.org/marmotta-graduation-vote>
> [2] <http://s.apache.org/marmotta-graduation-result>
> [3] <http://s.apache.org/marmotta-graduation-resolution>
> [4] <http://s.apache.org/dYt>
>
> Apache Marmotta Graduation Resolution
> =
>
> X. Establish the Apache Marmotta Project
>
>WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
>open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
>the public, related to an open platform for Linked Data.
>
>NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Marmotta Project",
>be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>Foundation; and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that the Apache Marmotta Project be and hereby is
>responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>related to an open platform for Linked Data;
>and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Marmotta" be
>and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>of the Apache Marmotta Project, and to have primary responsibility
>for management of the projects within the scope of
>responsibility of the Apache Marmotta Project; and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>Apache Marmotta Project:
>
>  * Peter Ansell     
>  * Fabian Christ   
>  * Sergio Fernández 
>  * Jakob Frank   
>  * Dietmar Glachs  
>  * Thomas Kurz   
>  * Nandana Mihindukulasooriya  
>  * Raffaele Palmieri 
>  * Sebastian Schaffert  
>  * Rupert Westenthaler 
>
>NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jakob Frank
>be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Marmotta, to
>serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
>Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
>death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
>or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that the Apache Marmotta Project be and hereby
>is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>Incubator Marmotta podling; and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
>Incubator Marmotta podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
>Project are hereafter discharged.
>


Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

2013-06-15 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
On Friday, June 14, 2013, Ross Gardler  wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.

+1 (binding)

Best Regards,
Nandana

-- 
Best Regards,
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya


Re: homepage err msg "You are not allowed to edit this page"

2013-04-26 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
Hi Jim,

2013/4/25 james pruett 
>
> I posted my podling here.
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/jamespruett
> Comments appreciated.
>

There is a guide [1] in the Apache Incubator website that helps you to
write a good proposal and also a template that you can use as a guide. You
can also take a look at few existing proposals [2].

Best Regards,
Nandana

[1] - http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html
[2] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals


Re: [VOTE] Accept jclouds into the Apache Incubator

2013-04-22 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rebecca Wood  wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I am calling a VOTE for acceptance of jclouds into the Apache Incubator.
>

+1 (binding)

Best Regards,
Nandana


Re: Logo proposal for the Marmotta incubating project

2013-01-18 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
We know that "Apache Project Branding Requirements" [1] applies to
top-level projects. Does the podling have to follow the same ?

The contributors followed "Podling name search guide" while they were
making the proposal. Can a podling do the official name search [2] which
they can use to become TLP later at anytime during the podling ?

Best Regards,
Nandana


[1] - http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics
[2] -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PODLINGNAMESEARCH


On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Sergio Fernández <
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote:

> Dear IMPC,
>
> from the Marmotta incubating project we are calling for comments for the
> project logo. You can find the current draft [1] attached at MARMOTTA-5 [2].
>
> In addition, the project PMC would like to know how to proceed with the
> logo registration within ASF (intellectual property donation and so on).
>
> Thanks so much.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/secure/attachment/**
> 12565311/apache-marmotta-logo.**zip<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12565311/apache-marmotta-logo.zip>
> [2] 
> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/MARMOTTA-5<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-5>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Salzburg Research
> +43 662 2288 318
> Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II
> A-5020 Salzburg (Austria)
> http://www.salzburgresearch.at
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> general-help@incubator.apache.**org
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya


Re: Karma for incubator wiki

2012-12-09 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
Could someone please grant me write access to the incubator wiki, I am a
mentor of Marmotta project and need the write access to sign off the board
reports.

My wiki id is - NandanaMihindukulasooriya

Thanks in advance !!

Best Regards,
Nandana

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:

> Its done, happy contributing!
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Martin Veith 
> wrote:
> > Could anybody please grant me write access to the incubator wiki, I need
> this to fill in the Etch report. My wiki id is MartinVeith.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>


Re: [VOTE] Accept Marmotta into the incubator

2012-11-29 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
Hi,

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Andy Seaborne  wrote:
>
> Please cast your votes on whether to accept the Apache Marmotta proposal:
>

+1 (binding)

Best Regards,
Nandana


Re: What constitute a successful project?

2012-11-27 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
Hi,

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Bernd Fondermann <
bernd.fonderm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Jukka Zitting 
> wrote:
> This is exactly what we did for the last months (years, actually).
> Give it yet more time.
> Honestly, I don't understand why we should continue in this mode "for
> another few months" when it failed for the past years.
> Is this the extra-bonus IPMC time


Thinking in general not on this specific case, may be we can define a
formal warning for retirement for podlings where the PPMC has to come up
with a concrete plans for the next six months and some measurable goals.
Once the formal warning is issued, it can be processed by the clutch [1]
and also show the elapsed time. In 3 months, 6 months, 9 months mentors and
IPMC can decide whether to remove the warning or not. After one year, if
there is no significant change and the goals are not archived, IPMC can
easily decide in favor of retirement because they know the history of the
issue. At the same time, every three months until retirement PPMC will be
notified that they are still under the warning (I think this is somewhat
happening even now, as I've seen from Jukka's replies to the board
reports), so they will have reasonable time to take action. Of course, we
don't need a process like this in the case of the PPMC unanimously agree
for retirement.

Best Regards,
Nandana

[1] - http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html


Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Wink from Incubator

2012-11-26 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
[ X ] +1 (binding) Graduate Wink podling from Incubator

Best Regards,
Nandana

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Raymond Feng  wrote:

> +1 (binding).
>
> Sent from my iPhone 5
>
> On Nov 25, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Luciano Resende  wrote:
>
> > The Apache Wink project entered incubator in May of 2009. Since then
> > it has grown the community in users, committers and PPMC members,
> > made significant improvements to the project codebase and completed
> > many releases following ASF policies and guidelines.
> >
> > The Apache Wink community has voted to proceed with graduation [1]
> > and the result can be found at [2]. Discussion about the proposed
> > resolution
> > is also available at [3].
> >
> > Please cast your votes:
> >
> > [  ] +1 Graduate Wink podling from Incubator
> > [  ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Wink
> > [  ] -1 Reject graduation of Wink podling from Incubator because ...
> >
> > Please find the proposed board resolution below.
> >
> > [1] http://s.apache.org/wink-graduation-vote
> > [2] http://s.apache.org/wink-graduation-result
> > [3] http://s.apache.org/wink-graduation-resolution
> >
> >
> > Resolution:
> >
> > X.Establish the Apache Wink Project
> >
> >   WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> >   interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's
> >   purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with
> >   the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for
> > distribution
> >   at no charge to the public, related to enabling development and
> >   consumption of REST style web services.
> >
> >   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> >   Committee (PMC), to be known as the "The Apache Wink Project",
> >   be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> >   Foundation; and be it further
> >
> >   RESOLVED, that The Apache Wink Project be and hereby is
> >   responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
> >   project related to enabling development and consumption of
> >   REST style web services; and be it further
> >
> >   RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Wink" be and
> >   hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
> >   direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of The Apache
> >   Wink Project, and to have primary responsibility for
> >   management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of
> >   The Apache Wink Project; and be it further
> >
> >   RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> >   hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of The
> >   Apache Wink Project:
> >
> > * Bryant Luk (bluk)
> > * Christopher James Blythe (cjblythe)
> > * Dustin Amrhein (damrhei)
> > * Davanum Srinivas (dims)
> > * Eli Baram (elib)
> > * Michael Elman (elman)
> > * Jesse A. Ramos (jramos)
> > * Kevan Lee Miller (kevan)
> > * Luciano Resende (lresende)
> > * Martin Snitkovsky (martins)
> > * Nadav Fischer (nfischer)
> > * Nicholas L. Gallardo (ngallardo)
> > * Zhaohui Feng (rfeng)
> > * Michael Rheinheimer (rott)
> > * Tomer Shadi (tomershadi)
> >
> >   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Luciano
> >   Resende, be and hereby is appointed to the office of Vice
> >   President, Wink, to serve in accordance with and subject to
> >   the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
> >   Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or
> >   disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it
> >   further
> >
> >   RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Wink Project be and hereby
> >   is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> >   Incubator Wink podling; and be it further
> >
> >   RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache
> >   Incubator Wink podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> >   PMC are hereafter discharged.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

2012-11-20 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
Hi,


> out of curiosity - how does this relate to or maybe even complement Eclipse
> Lyo [1]? For instance is Lyo one of the Enterprise Linked Data scenarios
> which you have been mentioning above?
>
> [1] http://www.eclipse.org/lyo/
>

Eclipse Lyo is focused on OSLC (Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration)
. OSLC tries to solve to the issue [1] of
integrating variety application life-cycle management (ALM) tools using the
Linked Data principles. To do so, they define a set of specifications [2]
including a core specifications and a specification to each of the
different domains in ALM (eg. requirement management, change management,
quality management, etc.) that define a minimum common vocabulary needed
for integration and some additional features required for tool integration
like "delegated UI", "Resource Shape", and a simplified query syntax. There
is an overlap of OSLC Core and LDP specifications as both of them define a
basic protocol for Linked Data based applications. According to the wiki of
OSLC Core specification [3], "work is current advancing on version 3.0 and
alignment with W3C member submission on Linked Data Basic Profile and the
work of the W3C Linked Data Platform working group". Currently Lyo provides
[4] a Java (and Perl) SDK for OSLC, a set of reference implementatons for
each domain like Change Management, and an OLSC test suite.

IMHO, you are right, OSLC is one of the Enterprise Linked Data scenarios.

The main difference I see is that Eclipse Lyo is focused on
Application Life-cycle Management domain where as LDP / Marmotta project
will provide a more general purpose LDP implementation where wide variety
of Linked Data applications (Enterprise, Open Data, exposing legacy data,
etc.) can be built. Depending on how things progress and the choice of the
Lyo community, Lyo might be able to use Marmotta for adapting LDP.

Best Regards,
Nandana

[1] - http://open-services.net/about/#problem
[2] - http://open-services.net/specifications/
[3] - http://open-services.net/wiki/core/
[4] - http://wiki.eclipse.org/Lyo#Overview_of_current_Lyo_content


Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

2012-11-18 Thread Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
I have to say when I heard the name "Linda", I really liked it because it
is short, catchy, easy to remember and goes well with Linked Data. But I
totally agree that it is good to avoid any name conflict issues or
trademark issues in this early stage where it is easily possible. I was
thinking whether LindaWeb or WebLinda would be an alternative choice.

Best Regards,
Nandana

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:14 AM, David Crossley  wrote:

> Another possblility is "Adnil" being reversed linked data.
> A nice twist.
>
> Anyway, up to the podling.
>
> There are some useful Incubator resources for quickly dealing
> with the Name issue. Here are some:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-names
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#name
>
> There great advice in this thread that could be added
> to docs.
>
> -David
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>