[Milagro] Milagro podling was retired

[jean-frederic clere]

Details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25633
--
Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT][VOTE] The retirement of Apache Milagro

[jean-frederic clere]

Hi All,

The vote passes with 5 +1s and no negative votes. All votes were binding.

I will proceed with the retirement of the project.

--
Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] The retirement of Apache Milagro

[jean-frederic clere]

Hi All,

Based on discussion[1], I would like to call a vote to retire Apache 
Milagro.


Please vote accordingly:
[] +1 approve
[] +0 no option
[] -1 disapprove with a reason

[1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/kfnro4o2tdctlc6tryxmn70tddpwf5wh

Thank you all for your participation.

--
Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Milagro (incubating) MPC v0.1

[jean-frederic clere]

On 10/26/22 19:32, John McCane-Whitney wrote:

Hi,

This is a call to vote on the release of the Apache Milagro (incubating) MPC 
v0.1


+1
--
Cheers

Jean-Frederic


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [ROLE CALL] Roll Calls for projects missing reports

[jean-frederic clere]

On 10/14/22 00:37, Justin Mclean wrote:

- Milagro


Sorry my bad, I was on holidays and forgot about it.

--
Cheers

Jean-Frederic


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Milagro (incubating) Crypto-C V2.0.1

[jean-frederic clere]

On 13/01/2020 12:25, John McCane-Whitney wrote:

Hi,

This is a call to vote on the release  of the Apache Milagro (incubating) 
Crypto C Library v2.0.1

The Apache Milagro (incubating) community has voted to approve this release 
with 5 x +1 votes.  The vote result thread can be found here:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r37dd9eca0a5b8dc4035713826a84b2ba807cfd67c2d07fafe8a64f34%40%3Cdev.milagro.apache.org%3E

Apache Milagro (incubating) Crypto-C V2.0.1 Release Tag:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-milagro-crypto-c/releases/tag/2.0.1

OVERVIEW:

Apache Milagro Crypto C 2.0.1-incubating is the second Apache Software 
foundation release of this library.

There are two main additions to the library and they both impact the API hence 
the jump from v1.0.0 to v2.0.1:

Shamir's Secret Sharing (SSS) has been added to the library. There is also 
functionality combining the existing BLS solution with SSS to enable signature 
aggregation without revealing the secret key share. This change is required by 
the Milagro DTA (https://github.com/apache/incubator-milagro-dta) and will 
allow subsequent releases of the DTA to be built from an official Apache 
release of the crypto-c library.

The Paillier additively homomorphic cryptosystem has also been added to the 
library which will be required by subsequent releases of the DTA to enable 
Multi-Party Computation of cryptocurrency wallet addresses and subsequently to 
create transaction signatures for these wallets.

The library now also supports Python 3 and formulas in the documentation are 
now rendered using MathJax.

Please see the README (https://github.com/apache/incubator-milagro-crypto-c) 
for build/test instructions, a list of contributors and guidelines on how to 
contribute yourself.  The README also includes instructions on how to build the 
documentation, and the online version of the documentation 
(http://milagro.apache.org/docs/amcl-c-api/) will be updated once the release 
is complete (as will the download page on the same site).

RELEASE:

The repo has the required DISCLAIMER, NOTICE and LICENSE file in its root 
directory.  All source files have the appropriate license header.  No binaries 
are included in this release.

I have successfully built and ran the tests as per the instructions in the 
README on Ubuntu, Fedora, MacOS and Windows

The compressed archives from this release along with a SHA512 checksum, PGP 
signature and PGP key file are being staged here:

Source code archive: 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/milagro/apache-milagro-crypto-c-2.0.1-incubating/apache-milagro-crypto-c-2.0.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
SHA512 checksum: 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/milagro/apache-milagro-crypto-c-2.0.1-incubating/apache-milagro-crypto-c-2.0.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha512
PGP Signature: 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/milagro/apache-milagro-crypto-c-2.0.1-incubating/apache-milagro-crypto-c-2.0.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
Keys: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/milagro/KEYS

We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this 
incubator release as follows:

[X] +1 approve


All tests passed on fedora31.

Make sure to get the key you use to sign the release signed by someone 
in ASF next time ;-) (not blocker for the release).



[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (please provide reason)

Checklist for reference:

[ ] Download links are valid
[ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
[ ] DISCLAIMER, LICENCE & NOTICE files are included
[ ] Source code archives have correct names matching the current release.
[ ] All source code files have licence headers
[ ] No compiled binaries are included
[ ] Libraries build correctly and all tests pass (as per the instructions in 
the readme file)

The vote will be open for a minimum of 72 hours.  3 x +1 votes are required to 
approve this release.

Many thanks,

John

John McCane-Whitney
Director of Product at Qredo Ltd
T: +44 7966 490687
Kemp House
152 - 160 City Road
London
EC1V 2NX
https://qredo.com
Qredo Ltd is a limited company registered in England and Wales (registered 
number 7834052). This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, and are 
intended only for the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient 
you may not copy, disclose to anyone else or otherwise use the content of this 
e-mail or any attachment thereto and should notify the sender immediately and 
delete them from your system.




--
Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Milagro (incubating) Decentralized Trust Authority v0.1.0 (alpha release)

[jean-frederic clere]

On 19/09/2019 10:06, Brian Spector wrote:

Bumping this up. IPMC folks, could you please help us and review.


+1 from me, anyway it is a alpha ;-)

--
Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Dubbo into the Apache Incubator

[jean-frederic clere]

On 09/02/18 03:09, Huxing Zhang wrote:
> [X] +1 Accept Dubbo into the Apache Incubator

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Write access to January report page

[jean-frederic clere]

On 01/05/2017 07:03 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:41 PM, jean-frederic clere 
> wrote:
> 
>> On 01/05/2017 01:51 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be
>>> editable by Mentors/IPMC members?
>>
>> So I probably have a problem... JeanFredericClere my user can't edit it
>> or is it too late?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Jean-Frederic
>>
> 
> Hi Jean-Frederic,
> 
> others have experienced similar issues editing this time. If it is for the
> FreeMarker report I can easily sign it for you, it seems I can edit the
> page.

Yes please

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jacopo
> 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Write access to January report page

[jean-frederic clere]

On 01/05/2017 01:51 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Hi,
> Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be
> editable by Mentors/IPMC members?

So I probably have a problem... JeanFredericClere my user can't edit it
or is it too late?

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

> 
> Cheers
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

[jean-frederic clere]

On 09/27/2016 10:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> [X] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: What is our longest incubation time

[jean-frederic clere]

On 07/28/2016 12:24 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Salut Jean-Frédéric,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:00 PM, jean-frederic clere  
> wrote:
>> There isn't a limit of the time for a podling to stay in incubation,
>> correct?
> 
> That's correct, though the PMC regularly looks at "very old" podlings.
> 
>> ...I am curious about what is longest time between the start of incubation
>> and graduation of a project, any hints?...
> 
> http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html has the current podlings, Wave
> which started in late 2010 is the oldest IIUC.

Merci

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

What is our longest incubation time

[jean-frederic clere]

Hi,

There isn't a limit of the time for a podling to stay in incubation,
correct?

I am curious about what is longest time between the start of incubation
and graduation of a project, any hints?

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

[jean-frederic clere]

On 06/19/2015 09:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

[ ] +1 accept Freemarker into the Apache Incubator


Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Mentor cleanup

[jean-frederic clere]

On 05/03/2012 12:47 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:

   Amber
   - active, not in status file: Raymond Feng
   - inactive: Brian McCallister, David Jencks, Gianugo Rabellino,
Jean-Frederic Clere
   - listed in projects.xml: Henning Schmiedehausen


I have been to of cycle for a while it should improve soon.
Amber is going a working podling so no worries for the moment.

I am also Mentor of NUvem but here Luciano is doing most of the 
mentoring work.


Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Nuvem Project

[jean-frederic clere]

On 06/19/2010 05:07 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> [X] +1, bring Nuvem into Incubator

Cheers

Jean-Frederic


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Incubator Board Report June 2010

[jean-frederic clere]

On 06/14/2010 07:22 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> The most important issues that must be addressed before graduation are: 1.
> One 2. Two 3. Three

We should have removed that sentence I think.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Nuvem Project

[jean-frederic clere]

On 06/09/2010 09:06 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to propose the Nuvem project for addition to the Apache 
> incubator.
> 
> The initial proposal is available at the the Wiki[1], and it is also
> included below for convenience.
> 
> We are looking forward to any and all feedback and/or questions on the
> proposal. We are also looking for a Champion and mentors, and would
> very much welcome additional volunteers to help steer Nuvem through
> the incubation process.

+1 : And add me as mentor.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Amber podling starting

[jean-frederic clere]

Hi,

The stuff seems to take more time that excepted AMBER-1 is blocked by
INFRA-2703 and INFRA-2701 and root doesn't answer to the request for the
new users.

We have JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBER) and cwiki
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBER) set up.
We also have a web site (http://incubator.apache.org/projects/amber.html).

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Zeta Components into the incubator

[jean-frederic clere]

+1

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Restored missing Bluesky/Clerezza parts of this month's report

[jean-frederic clere]

On 05/17/2010 11:59 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 17/05/2010 22:55, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> FYI I just fixed the report - the beginning of Clerezza
>>> report had been mistakenly deleted in revision 19.
>>
>> Thanks.  Apparently, the entire thing was gone, including the section header 
>> that said it was neccesary.
>>
>>> Looks like there are other inconsistencies in the wiki report, Amber,
>>> Hise and Whirr are missing but according to [the reporting schedule]
>>> they should be there.
>>
>> I usually cut projects a bit of slack when they are new within the month, 
>> e.g., Amber and Whirr.  I'd expect June-August from them.
> 
> AFAIK, we (Amber) are waiting on lists, SVN, accounts etc still.
> So there's nothing to report as yet, apart from the above.

The JIRA (INFRA-2702, INFRA-2703 INFRA-2701) have beeen created  we are
waiting for INFRA to process them.
The cwiki is ready see
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBER, we should start to
add content to it.


Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

[jean-frederic clere]

On 05/13/2010 10:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Just curious.  If a graduated project is sponsoring an incubation does
> the podling *require* mentors?  Isn't that the roll of the sponsoring PMC?

http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Sponsor

My understanding is that the sponsor works before the mentors. The
document says that the sponsor chooses the mentors for example.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Deltacloud Project

[jean-frederic clere]

On 05/13/2010 02:45 AM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> after the discussion so far [1], I'd like to put Detlacloud for a vote
> for acceptance into the Apache Incubator according to the proposal[2]
> 

+1

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Zeta proposal - Next steps

[jean-frederic clere]

On 05/07/2010 04:35 PM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we gathered 3 mentors by our call for mentors here on the list and
> private contact to Apache members. These are:
> 
> - Christian Grobmeier (not ASF member)

Sorry according to
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Mentor he
should be in the Incubator PMC.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

[jean-frederic clere]

On 05/05/2010 12:48 AM, Simone Gianni wrote:
> I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by
> the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling.  The goal is to build a community
> around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and
> implementation
> 
> The proposal is available on the wiki at and included below:
> 
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AmberProposal
> 
> [X] +1  to accept Amber into the Incubator

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

[jean-frederic clere]

On 04/29/2010 11:45 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> The Shindig PMC has approved the proposal to sponsor the Amber project for
> the Apache Incubator.
> 
> 7 +1 votes were submitted. [Henning, Chirag, Chico, Paul, Jacky, Santiago
> and Vincent]
> No 0 or -1 votes.

Cool, I added my self as mentor.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

> 
> Thanks
> Paul
> 
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Paul Lindner  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I propose that the Shindig PMC sponsor the Amber project - which is an
>> OAuth 1.0/2.0 library under development in Apache Labs.
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AmberProposal
>>
>> Our sponsorship would allow Amber to graduate to the Apache
>> incubator.  After some time it could graduate to a subproject of Shindig or
>> as a top level project of it's own.
>>
>> Vote open for 72h
>>
>> +1 Sponsor Amber
>> +0 no opinion
>> -1 Don't sponsor Amber
>>
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Traffic Server as a TLP

[jean-frederic clere]

On 04/09/2010 07:54 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> As no issues have been raised in our previous post to discuss graduation,
> the Apache Traffic Server community requests that the IPMC vote on
> recommending
> this resolution to the ASF Board.
> 
> Traffic Server community vote to graduate:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/trafficserver-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01750.html
> 
> 
> Incubation status:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/trafficserver.html
> 
> Please cast your vote:
> [X] +1 to recommend Traffic Server's graduation

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

[jean-frederic clere]

On 02/23/2010 04:57 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
> champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote.
> 
> I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be
> sponsored by the Incubator PMC for a new Validation podling.  The goal
> is to build a community around delivering a JSR-303 Bean Validation
> implementation based on a new incoming codebase from Agimatec GmbH.
> 
> The proposal is available on the wiki at and included below:
> 
>http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal
> 
> 
> [X] +1  to accept Validation into the Incubator

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

[jean-frederic clere]

On 02/23/2010 06:19 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500
> Donald Woods  wrote:
> 
>> Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
>> champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote.
>>
>> I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be
>> sponsored by the Incubator PMC for a new Validation podling.  The goal
>> is to build a community around delivering a JSR-303 Bean Validation
>> implementation based on a new incoming codebase from Agimatec GmbH.
>>
>> The proposal is available on the wiki at and included below:
>>
>>http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal
> 
> -1 to a project that could end up being called "Apache Validation" or 
> just "Validation".  That's too big/general a word for a project name.
> 
> No objection under a changed name.  I'd suggest adding an
> adjective to indicate what is being validated.
> 

Apache BeanValidation?

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Checking status of "transfer rights" ?

[jean-frederic clere]

On 02/09/2010 11:00 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Leif Hedstrom  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> sorry if this is not the right channel for this question, but, I'd like to
>> find out if ASF has received any paperworks from Yahoo!, showing that we've
>> transfered the rights for Traffic Server code to ASF. If not, is there a
>> form that they need to fill out and submit?
> 
> There hasn't been a CCLA, but all of traffic servers commits have been
> covered by iCLAs of the comitters, so no, Yahoo does not need to do
> anything else.
> 
>> Also, I know we still need to transfer some TM over to ASF as well, but that
>> is still being worked on. I'd assume transfer of these remaining TMs (most
>> have expired already, including the one in the US) is a prerequisite for
>> doing an official Apache Traffic Server release?
> 
> I honestly don't think we should block doing a release on this, if
> Yahoo sues us over the TM, well... heh, it just doesn't make sense.

Does it make sense to ask Yahoo to write a letter that tells they won't
sue us over the TM?

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Missing reports due NOW

[jean-frederic clere]

On 01/19/2010 10:57 AM, Gav... wrote:
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 7:24 PM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Missing reports due NOW
>>
>> The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation with no
>> moderator for the dev@ list.
> 
> Or no 'active' moderators, these are listed as mods for the dev list.
> 
> 
> francisdb
> doebele
> reiher

Add me.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

> 
> Gav...
> 
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Francis De Brabandere
>>  wrote:
>>> As far as I know we (empire-db) also did not receive a notification.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Francis
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
>>>  wrote:

 On Jan 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman 
>> wrote:
>> Missing:
>>
>>Subversion
>
> Hmm.  Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball
> got dropped, I guess.  Subversion should have something submitted
>> by
> this evening.  -- justin

 The automated notifier ("Marvin"?) sent it's notification on Jan. 1,
>> and it was promptly missed in all the post-holiday revelry.

 -Hyrum
 
>> -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.somatik.be
>>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept OODT for Incubation

[jean-frederic clere]

On 01/18/2010 09:17 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like
> to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator.
> 
> [X] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Handling of Traffic Server Trademark

[jean-frederic clere]

On 01/19/2010 03:50 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> 
>> Traffic Server would like to resolve the TradeMark issues.
>> Who would be able to make this call?
> 
> The relevant content is:
> 
>> Y! holds several TMs for the name "Traffic Server", most of which
>> expires soon. Our legal team has proposed two possible solutions,
>> the first being the easiest for us.
> 
>>1. Yahoo! provides ASF with a letter of assurance stating that we
>>   own all right, title and interest in and to the TRAFFIC SERVER
>>   mark and the four active registrations and that we will not take
>>   any action against ASF or any of its licensees during the life of
>>   these registrations (and we'd express our intention of letting
>>   them lapse and expire in this letter).
> 
>>2. Yahoo! will assign all right, title and interest in and to the
>>   TRAFFIC SERVER mark including the four active registrations to
>>   ASF [though we'd probably want to make this contingent on getting
>>   through the incubator stage].
> 
> We can run this through Apache Legal, but my take is that we'd prefer option
> #2, which is the same route that I believe was previously used for
> SpamAssassin.

+1

> 
> One issue, as I understand it, is that the ASF probably should not be
> letting marks lapse, and should be maintaining them.  But those aspects
> ought to be ASF-wide, and would come from Apache Legal.

Sure.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] OODT: a grid middleware framework for science data processing, information integration, and retrieval

[jean-frederic clere]

On 01/06/2010 10:56 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Count me in as a mentor for this excellent proposal.

If you still need more mentors count on me too.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] OODT: a grid middleware framework for science data processing, information integration, and retrieval

[jean-frederic clere]

On 01/04/2010 08:46 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> hsqldb | LGPL v2.1

Well http://hsqldb.org/web/hsqlLicense.html

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Hibernate migration strategy Was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] OpenMeetings

[jean-frederic clere]

On 11/19/2009 05:49 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

If you are going to do a rewrite, yet another option is to use Apache
Cayenne, which has all the features of a modern ORM (plus a few more)
and is also rather friendly to beginners:

http://cayenne.apache.org/


So cayenne is JPA-enabled?

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

[jean-frederic clere]

On 11/04/2009 09:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:

  Subversion is a version control system.  You probably know it well as
it is the version control system employed by the Apache Software
Foundation.

  The Subversion project would like to join the Apache Software
Foundation to remove the overhead of having to run its own
corporation.  The Subversion project is already run quite like an
Apache project, and already counts a number of ASF Members amongst
its committers.



+1

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

[jean-frederic clere]

On 10/28/2009 07:39 PM, Paul Querna wrote:

Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors.  I
would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF.

The proposal is included below and is also at:


Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept Libcloud for incubation


+1

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Fwd: [PROPOSAL] Libcloud Project

[jean-frederic clere]

+1 Add me as Mentor if you need someone more :-)

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

 Original Message 
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Libcloud Project
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:59:36 -0700
From: Paul Querna 
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org

Hi,

I would like to propose incubating the existing Libcloud project to
join the ASF:

Proposal  Wiki: 

Libcloud is a unified Python API around many common cloud services
provider, and I believe it could benefit greatly by joining the Apache
Software Foundation.  I also believe the ASF needs more Python
projects, and more projects involved in the developing cloud
infrastructure.  We still need a few mentors, so feel free to signup
:-)

We would appreciate feedback and comments on the proposal.

Full proposal is bellow.

Thanks,

Paul


Libcloud, a unified interface to the cloud

Abstract

libcloud () is a pure python client library
for interacting with many of the popular cloud server providers. It
was created to make it easy for developers to build products that work
between any of the services that it supports.

Proposal

* Provide unified API for manipulating servers instances across
many hosting providers who provide an API to manipulate instances.
Current API includes: list, reboot, create, destroy, list images, list
sizes.

* (future) Provide utilities for manipulating and creating server
images in many formats. (See the independent Stacklet project for
ideas)

* (future) Provide unified API for storing large objects on
popular hosting provider storage APIs.

Background

While there are some projects to create open standards for
interoperability within the cloud, most have failed to gain widespread
adoption. Libcloud takes the approach of exposing a unified API to
cover multiple vendor's APIs, and in the future to support standard
APIs, assuming they become prevalent.

Rationale

There is a strong need in the developing cloud infrastructure for a
community supported, high quality, and vendor independent tool set for
managing servers and their resources. When new servers are just an API
call away, traditional infrastructure models are changing quickly.
Having a good library built around Apache's values and tradition will
enable new server infrastructure to evolve much more quickly.

Initial Goals

Libcloud is an existing open source project, with patches from many
different contributors. We view the moving to Apache as a way to
improve this community, and look into future APIs around creating
server images and large object storage.

Current Status

Libcloud is already open source under the ASL 2.0:

* Libcloud Website 
* Libcloud Mailing Lists 
* Libcloud Source Control 

Meritocracy

Libcloud has involvement from members of both the ASF and other open
source projects. Communication is driven by both IRC and E-Mail lists.

Community

Currently libcloud has several contributors, but not a large user
community other than a few companies. We would like to increase our
userbase as part of the incubator process.

Core Developers

Alex Polvi who wrote most of the original code is familiar with open
source from working at OSUOSL and at Mozilla. Tom Davis drove much of
the re factoring of the initial code base. Jed Smith, Ivan Meredith,
Jeremy Orem, Jerry Chen and Paul Querna (ASF member) have all
contributed mainly to developing provider specific drivers.

Alignment

Currently there are not many Apache communities involved with cloud
computing or python based infrastructure. We believe introducing such
a community is a good thing for the Apache Software Foundation.

Known Risks

Orphaned products

libcloud is being used actively by Cloudkick to develop services. It
is a core part of our ongoing infrastructure improvements.

Inexperience with Open Source

libcloud was open sourced in July 2009, during OSCON. Core
contributors include former employees of Mozilla and an ASF member.

Homogenous Developers

Much of the initial development was done by Cloudkick, but much of the
core design was re-factored by the community, and many of the drivers
for each provider have been contributed by 3rd parties.

Reliance on Salaried Developers

The majority, but not all, of the developers are paid by their
employer to work on libcloud at this time.

Relationships with Other Apache Products

Libcloud doesn't share many attributes with existing Apache projects
due to it being in Python and addressing a new need.

A Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

Libcloud project seeks to build a last community around cloud API
interoperability, and is not fascinated with any short term gains of
being associated with the Apache Brand.

Documentation

TODO: links to related material on Cloud APIs/interop (?)

Initial Source

Initial s

Re: [Proposal][Vote] Traffic Server

[jean-frederic clere]

On 07/03/2009 01:03 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:

Good evening,

As you know, we've been preparing our proposal to submit Traffic Server
to the Incubator for a few weeks now. With the help from our champion
(thanks Doug!), and the entire Incubator community, it's my pleasure to
submit a request for Traffic Server to be accepted into the Incubator.
The proposal is attached below, and is also available on the Wiki:

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrafficServerProposal


Since our first draft, we've added a number of mentors and contributors,
and also added and improved on the proposal. I would like this to be
considered our official application, and that the Incubator votes (+ or
-) on our acceptance as a podling.


+1

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

[jean-frederic clere]

Leif Hedstrom wrote:

On Jun 25, 2009, at 7:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:

I don't think that is a problem: httpd (and other ASF project) also 
uses autconf/autoheader/automake to generate the configure that are 
included in the sources tarballs.


Cool! One more (followup) question:

We have a couple of files which currently have the BSD license attached 
to them, and these are flagged as potential IP violations. Is it 
possible to include these files and re-release them under the Apache 
license, or do we need to eliminate them (i.e. clean-room rewrite the 
functionality) ?


James was using the following see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jspf/trunk/tester/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/tester/DNSTestingServer.java?revision=781370&pathrev=781370

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

[jean-frederic clere]

Leif Hedstrom wrote:

On Jun 25, 2009, at 12:52 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:




Great! Once our legal get their ducks lined up (very soon I hope),I'll
submit the official request for approval / vote. I want to resolve 
the TM issues around "Traffic Server" before we do this, in case we 
end up having to rename the project (but I hope it won't come to that).


Any progress on the topic?


Not yet, but apparently the legal person was away most of last week and 
this week. I'll do some more prodding to get some answers here.


On a positive note, we got our report back from the 3rd party who did a 
code review for IP ownership. There are a few "issues" we'll need to 
resolve, but nothing major and we'll obviously have them resolved before 
we push the source. The only "major" piece that might need to get 
removed for now is SNMP support.


One question though to the Incubator people: Several of the issues 
reported are around us using GNU configure, which is under GPL. How does 
other apache projects deal with this? Is it just a matter of not 
checking in the generated configure scripts, and expect people to use 
the .in, .am etc files to re-generate the scripts? This doesn't sound 
right though, because I'm pretty darn certain when I build Apache HTTP 
for example, I don't have to run autoconf or automake.


I don't think that is a problem: httpd (and other ASF project) also uses 
autconf/autoheader/automake to generate the configure that are included 
in the sources tarballs.


Cheers

Jean-Frederic



Cheers!

-- leif


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

[jean-frederic clere]

Leif Hedstrom wrote:

Leo Simons wrote:



Is there anything else missing?



Nope, it looks like you have your ducks in a row! +1 from me.
  


Great! Once our legal get their ducks lined up (very soon I hope),I'll
submit the official request for approval / vote. I want to resolve the 
TM issues around "Traffic Server" before we do this, in case we end up 
having to rename the project (but I hope it won't come to that).


Any progress on the topic?

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

[jean-frederic clere]

Roy T. Fielding wrote:

On Jun 15, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:

Roy T. Fielding wrote:

I like the idea, though I would prefer that a larger group
of committers (outside Yahoo!) were known up front because
that sounds like a big code base. Any chance you could convince
some of the former coders to join in the proposal?


This is definitely a valid concern. We will try to get more people 
involved now that the process has begun, but I don't know if or how 
soon we can get some external developers to sign up. It's a bit of a 
catch 22, since we don't have the source out there yet.


I know, and they may be prevented (by former employee contract) from
talking about it until after Y! makes the code public.  I would just
place it on the "wish list" of things to do before graduating.

BTW, Traffic Server is a registered trademark (2304928) owned by
Yahoo!  Is that trademark going to be assigned to the ASF as well
or does the project plan on changing the name?


I would like to see how various bits compare to implementations
within httpd, particularly the protocol bits.


We have run TS through Co-Advisor a number of times, and it fairs 
pretty well (as well as Squid, at least). Would it help putting up the 
results somewhere (I'd have to verify that this is possible and doable 
first though)? And as I mentioned in the proposal draft, we run TS + 
apache together for many Y! sites, and they work very well together.


Sorry, I did not mean to imply that acceptance was conditional
on the code quality.  I am just interested in seeing if our
projects can help each other once the code is available under
the Apache License.

If there is a scarcity of mentors, then I will mentor this project.


I think I will have cycles to help.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Geronimo mailing lists and CVS

[jean-frederic clere]

Greg Stein wrote:
Hi all,

Two mailing lists have been set up for Apache Geronimo:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]   -- general discussion list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   -- receives CVS commit emails
These are standard EZMLM mailing lists. You can subscribe to them by sending
email to one/both of the following addresses:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
People interested in Geronimo should subscribe to the -dev list, as we will
begin shifting discussion over there.
There are "mbox" style archives for these mailing lists stored at:

http://incubator.apache.org/mail/

Noel has also set up Eyebrowse for the two lists:

http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ViewLists

The CVS module is:

incubator-geronimo

The initial committers are: gstein, geirm, jstrachan, ceki, jim. We will add
more committers once we receive confirmation that CLAs have been received
(Jim, the ASF Secretary, is out of town this week).
You can check out the CVS module with a command such as:

$ cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic co incubator-geronimo
Password: anoncvs
The CVS module is available for web-based browsing at:

http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/incubator-geronimo/
And it is empty for the moment:
+++
> du -s /home/cvs/incubator-geronimo
2   /home/cvs/incubator-geronimo
> date
Thu Aug  7 01:07:04 PDT 2003
+++


I believe that is about it for now. Have fun!

Cheers,
-g


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] create a new geronimo@incubator.apache.org mail list

[jean-frederic clere]

Noel J. Bergman wrote:
No vote necessary.  Thw new list is already operational.

All interested parties should subscribe to geronimo-dev@, by sending e-mail
to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] no?

and move discussion to the new list.  :-)

	--- Noel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]