Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Celix as TLP
2014-06-17 23:27 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org: Sure, the more the merrier or so I've been told ;) Looking forward to help getting good project to the next phase! Thanks! This gives us enough PMC members to satisfy the board's need. Can I now start the vote for Celix graduation? The updated proposal: === Board Resolution == X. Establish the Apache Celix Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to a native implementation of the OSGi specification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache Celix Project, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Celix Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to a native implementation of the OSGi specification; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache Celix be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Celix Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Celix Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Celix Project: * Alexander Broekhuis abro...@apache.org * Pepijn Noltes pnol...@apache.org * Bjoern Petribpe...@apache.org * Erik Jansman ejan...@apache.org * Marcel Offermans ma...@apache.org ejan...@apache.org * Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org ejan...@apache.org * Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org ejan...@apache.org NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Alexander Broekhuis be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Celix, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Celix PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache Celix Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Celix Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Celix podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Celix podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Alexander Broekhuis
Re: [VOTE] Retire the S4 podling
Hmn.. Just so all You Know, i am not here to dig Some old holes but just çooking for the true part of me and am not here to take over.. Am here and back now for peace and harmony. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 18, 26 Heisei, at 8:07 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: This is a vote thread, not a discussion thread. Read the earlier messages which are included in this thread for more context. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:02 PM, abiola balogun a_gucc...@me.com wrote: Why do u say so and who are you? Sent from my iPhone On Jun 16, 26 Heisei, at 8:18, abiola balogun a_gucc...@me.com wrote: Retire the S4 polling Sent from my iPhone On Jun 15, 26 Heisei, at 16:58, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: +1 (binding) LIeGrue, strub On Saturday, 14 June 2014, 16:10, Dave Fisher w...@apache.org wrote: +1, binding. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote: Hi all, Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@ mailing list [3] about retiring the podling. That VOTE has passed with no -1s and 4 (binding) +1s from the podling PMC/committers. (S4 only has committers, and doesn't distinguish between PPMC/committer.) We didn't get a weigh-in from all mentors/PPMC on the retirement VOTE, so I'm going ahead and asking for a vote here. This VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours. Please indicate (binding) or (non-binding) when casting your VOTE. +1 [ ] Yes, I am in favor of retiring S4 from the Apache Incubator. +0 [ ] -1 [ ] No, I am not in favor of retiring S4 because... +1 (binding) Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Call for July's Report Manager
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014, at 04:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:44 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Roman, hope you don't mind me getting this started early... Anyone interested in being a report manager for next month (July)'s report? Happily, Joe Brockmeier has already volunteered: Just confirming, yes - I'm happy to take this on for July. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Request for mentor assessment
On 16 Jun 2014, at 21:56, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:31PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On 06/12/2014 07:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: This suggests that ASF is being used as a GitHub of sorts. Are we comfortable with this? It's not really like GitHub. There is a community, at least a few people. It's definitely not about the cool tools, otherwise they would have gone to GitHub. We asked them recently, they declined and wanted to stay as they feel the ASF is the right place (see dev@ for reference) Speaking for myself, no. I'd be uncomfortable having a specific deadline for graduation, but a podling that's not making progress towards graduation (in general, not pointing a finger specifically at Wave here) should be terminated. For what it worth, I think you're right: a permanent incubator project doesn't make sense. For once, there's a lot of people mechanics involved into podlings' mentoring, reporting, etc. And it doesn't feel exactly right to forever handhold something that doesn't have an intention to evolve. The have the intention, but not the man power. There were phases with some excitement. If the IPMC wants to shut down the podling, then I would like to see us formulating a few rules when we do that. We should not shut a podling down just because we feel like that. Instead let us define what it means to evolve or what the intention to evolve means. Like: - no new committer for a year - AND no release for a year - AND less than 20 emails in a month on dev@ - AND less than 10 commits in a month - AND no way to change this in the next three months (in example: hackathon on horizon) (according to this, Wave would go to attic) Cheers, Christian Cos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --- http://www.grobmeier.de The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL @grobmeier GPG: 0xA5CC90DB - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Request for mentor assessment
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: - no new committer for a year - AND no release for a year - AND less than 20 emails in a month on dev@ - AND less than 10 commits in a month - AND no way to change this in the next three months (in example: hackathon on horizon) That is completely fair. In fact [as I promised last week] I am about to start a DISCUSS thread with amendments to our Incubation policy outlining these very criteria. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Celix as TLP
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-17 23:27 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org: Sure, the more the merrier or so I've been told ;) Looking forward to help getting good project to the next phase! Thanks! This gives us enough PMC members to satisfy the board's need. Can I now start the vote for Celix graduation? I'd say go ahead and lets hope for the best! I really think you guys would make a great little TLP. Thanks, Roman. The updated proposal: === Board Resolution == X. Establish the Apache Celix Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to a native implementation of the OSGi specification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache Celix Project, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Celix Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to a native implementation of the OSGi specification; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache Celix be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Celix Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Celix Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Celix Project: * Alexander Broekhuis abro...@apache.org * Pepijn Noltes pnol...@apache.org * Bjoern Petribpe...@apache.org * Erik Jansman ejan...@apache.org * Marcel Offermans ma...@apache.org ejan...@apache.org * Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org ejan...@apache.org * Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org ejan...@apache.org NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Alexander Broekhuis be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Celix, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Celix PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache Celix Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Celix Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Celix podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Celix podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Alexander Broekhuis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
