Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On 1/12/13 11:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. Oops, today I've tried my _separate_ script to file stabilization bugs based on a generated list of packages to support that workflow. Now the bug is that the list was the original one from January, and many entries from that list are now stale (the new contents were appended at the end). I hit ctrl-c once I realized the mistake, and I'm going to wait a while for the current batch of bugs to get handled. I can actually batch invalidate all of them. This will generate some further bug spam (I apologize), but can save your time dealing with the mess. Please let me know what's your preference. Paweł signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:22:13 +0100 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: I can actually batch invalidate all of them. This will generate some further bug spam (I apologize), but can save your time dealing with the mess. Please let me know what's your preference. The URL field is likely not filled out as intended either. So you might want to do that anyway. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 07:14:12 PM Tomáš Chvátal wrote: Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a): Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to keep the stable tree more up-to-date. I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers. Paweł Hmm, nice idea but how about expanding metadata.xml with something like info for stabilisations so they can be automatically grabbed for it. Quite few software is just nice enough that it can go automatically for stable in 30 days, and someone could just go then and open new bugs (with assigned arches) based on it (of course it expects brain from the guy reporting it that he checks if there are no open bugs). Because mails to -dev are frankly annoying. :-) Tom Tom, This is a better idea. I also believe this one can be auto stablized after 30 days. It's just kernel documentation. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Team Lead - Gentoo Sources E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3op=index
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On 13.1.2013 0.49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to keep the stable tree more up-to-date. I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers. I have an RSS feed for this purpose at: http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss Sources are available here: https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo infrastructure so more people know about it and use it? Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013/1/22 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org: I have an RSS feed for this purpose at: http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss Sources are available here: https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo infrastructure so more people know about it and use it? Yup that would be nice. Also we could really finegrain it based on metadata.xml settings if someone really wants to exclude his packages, and also we could think if it should be opt-out or opt-in. Cheers Tom
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: On 13.1.2013 0.49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to keep the stable tree more up-to-date. I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers. I have an RSS feed for this purpose at: http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss Sources are available here: https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo infrastructure so more people know about it and use it? File a bug against us then, with all the information needed for the deployment Theo
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a): Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to keep the stable tree more up-to-date. I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers. Paweł Hmm, nice idea but how about expanding metadata.xml with something like info for stabilisations so they can be automatically grabbed for it. Quite few software is just nice enough that it can go automatically for stable in 30 days, and someone could just go then and open new bugs (with assigned arches) based on it (of course it expects brain from the guy reporting it that he checks if there are no open bugs). Because mails to -dev are frankly annoying. :-) Tom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:49:52 -0800 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. # tomjbe media-libs/hamlib-1.2.15.3 media-radio/tlf-1.1.5 media-radio/xastir-2.0.4 are good to go. I put stable requests in bugzi already. Thanks for reminding Paweł. Thomas --
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/12/2013 05:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to keep the stable tree more up-to-date. I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers. Paweł net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017 be my guest, although I prefer the bugs personally. - -ZC -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ9rIDAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKnDoQALfr9pMXLYw9R7WvCpcZ9lpj yUUlSdLl5TS5ZnwxAM4cRG+VuoPEzn/1QQwh9VavFkfb09acRqaz4azeXMqkSdnt OthaylBKe2AwmAi7CYnmsyKFo6WSe+Nwl0pNNOoiw9JhOa/TwJzYDgqbQdCGZrB7 WkIjgngZ1I4/YYownNyTJ+TWD6pwEnbN3/pmbcKHwDrh4+/IPgDRcycVevr6l1jF 8adIOfDxgnmB823acboY5oJdgNe40+kajLXpLrXbiVUM1LPyPgwCXHX88hyyCFC6 qb6umJHSgQ7M1EC7KQWagnUpSYfehtp/eHFfLK5D8/7w60Vg3n5bJOTxq5yrXDwN PmdiamCTXbz7pIwFyJK7ryYYZgQ6LBvAcfZwxIFZcBeDkPjY8ktfA+yzdUEiz3D+ wZxNCfw7Y8ETWvs9biN4Br2G2YXe3HSCzXgo4SiEscom1H4+OryYWINhqKsGBd31 lvB4fBw/rl5Ca+6lUYhSH3/5l6WIJzZV55qbOMUhopMlttL2xFNDXrwiEzTn9br9 SVIiW+nm2azWxiHRhsbzVOYoocifxDzNPw5DTZjl3KhJgPqazQpe3kBbA+6A+v2y 7YHQRzTjfTTcjt+2wN/3ljmq+MOfxRkKfEOCE2iFhw3AUXyI49DgEOB47eQzHH0l JUk4p7iDqCE5YtqhtaME =8OSJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/12/2013 11:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. cool I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to keep the stable tree more up-to-date. you can add me to the whitelist for bug filing. Would you mind adding my # xmw app-laptop/thinkfan-0.8.1-r1 Thanks! I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers. Do you/we have any ready-to-use script to file stable requestst? I know it's just dome lines of python but I'm lazy. To lazy to get all these 10-something clicks'n'paste right to file such bugs on first attempt. Michael - -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://xmw.de/ mailto: Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlD2tEgACgkQknrdDGLu8JCXjwEAmnSj0mvW7hxJgNHSux+P0P/I ikSyI6XM357KIvU7DX0BAI1Nb6IyKJUq2GNhJCMUaX9RAEL1BvZLczPq+uCAkPvU =X8G6 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017 be my guest, although I prefer the bugs personally. That's what he's doing... asking maintainers if it's okay to open stabilization bugs for their packages.
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/16/2013 01:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote: honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails that I have to search through. - -ZC -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ90VqAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKC5QQAJ1CIMjcJabTxEgbnno1uXFM wB1eC8JD6BWeUfHIRs3APW2Klw4Tnx9eGl0wvRaJLmpMULSO2f1DCregzcuIpvpC L8Vk2RdVzVOzhU4ff7dYkc+MGRsh1ouTD9UMsALeyRorlOIQ74dkaqooDIm7WbPn CnzDBWg/kCECNOtFUGI+aMifpqyPABAKauFi9qHisdHnUrg6+g7bUmenFEEaWYU+ vFIcWt3LYAFkzwkd3pg1ym3qsiEEMzBqE4BVhmTVKKCP85hyfe1wgBNPyL7bkxOx b2W8wpcj5Uh9ddcX5CIPlfmS3L6qEN9lChteDCfuMS7AVnttcQi+NyQIpl/spKVz L1G3OjZOxPyS3D+nV/V10vQKsvXgXvrTKo64adzzJccjKGowG0ZNSh8li4Xgpkw5 PzABq1eQfjFCC175fG+T3v/j1lGse8216YJTv6X17rYj9X7gRuT6gGRdFci3MuFn KfeSLhoojdS2o3M/Cuqbt47YvARrNA3OLLYzrXvQr8EgC3K6VyusBIQEqxYn1a4b KxXJtksgCXbUllMTCV8qNXXY2Izv0Ojhvx8hxgKumWXiDyMBOjXwvcYR2Opl8TPK yKCeRFopmO/gahfArd/J8WvZWxDU0HTxkFplRfjx6Gwf57g9GeYDoCuEvHLp+SqU 6x6AKLLHVntMe0/Vpq3v =6mSE -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails that I have to search through. So ignore it and he'll open bugs just the same. This was just an early opportunity for people to say no, this shouldn't be stabilized.
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
13.01.2013 02:49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. # pinkbyte app-shells/ccsh-0.0.4-r3 app-shells/rrs-1.70-r1 dev-libs/jthread-1.3.1 Ok for them # netmon dev-libs/geoip-1.4.8-r2 Ok for it And thanks for your work. -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo Linux Developer Desktop-effects project lead signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 02:49:52PM -0800, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: # robbat2 app-admin/diradm-2.9.7.1 +1 # robbat2 app-shells/localshell-1.3.4 +1 # netmon dev-libs/geoip-1.4.8-r2 +0.5 looking for another vote # base-system sys-apps/irqbalance-1.0.5 +1 # base-system sys-apps/sg3_utils-1.34 +1 # base-system sys-block/aoetools-35 +0.5 # sysadmin sys-libs/freeipmi-1.2.3-r1 +0.5 -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On 15/01/2013 20:05, Robin H. Johnson wrote: sys-libs/freeipmi-1.2.3-r1 +0.5 I'd really prefer to see 1.2.2 or 1.2.3 stable first, given the history with FreeIPMI, I don't aim for too many stable candidates... -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On 12 January 2013 22:49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to keep the stable tree more up-to-date. I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers. Paweł ack for the packages I maintain -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers. I filed dev-python/paramiko-1.9.0 myself. :) Cheers, Dirkjan
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
On 14:49 Sat 12 Jan , Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates for January. I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to keep the stable tree more up-to-date. I'm just curious, how this actually works. Do you have a script that checks specific categories/packages for dependencies, open bugs. etc.? -- Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist ) ( Gentoo Lisp Project ) pgpi8aZayF1Fw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
13.01.2013 02:49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please review attached automatically generated stabilizatiocandidates for January. # mpagano kernel-misc sys-kernel/linux-docs-3.6. I'll do this for the just committed version linux-docs-3.6.11. What I will do for now on is change our stabilization procedure for kernels to include opening up a bug to stabilize the corresponding linux-docs version. So going forward, you can exclude this and hopefully we'll do a better job of keeping this package stable. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3op=index
