[gentoo-user] Emerge PHP+ Apache

2005-05-12 Thread C R. Little
Hi,
I've been messing with gentoo for around 2 years now and still have not learned 
the full functionality of emerge.

I've got 5 systems and I'm building a new one and would like to use the full 
functionality of emerge. 

To install apache and PHP i've always manually compiled the two. 

How does emerge do this and what is the command to type in emerge to get it to 
do this?


Thanks!
CR

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Emerge PHP+ Apache

2005-05-12 Thread C R. Little
Great thanks!

-Original Message-
From: Craig Duncan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 5:59 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge PHP+ Apache


C R. Little wrote:

>Hi,
>I've been messing with gentoo for around 2 years now and still have not 
>learned the full functionality of emerge.
>
>I've got 5 systems and I'm building a new one and would like to use the full 
>functionality of emerge. 
>
>To install apache and PHP i've always manually compiled the two. 
>
>How does emerge do this and what is the command to type in emerge to get it to 
>do this?
>
>
>Thanks!
>CR
>
>  
>
The first thing you need to do is RTFM - start here
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/index.xml?catid=gentoo 

Once you are familiar with portage, emerge and USE flags, you can do a
"pretend" emerge to see what USE flags are available for apache and
mod_php "emerge -pv apache mod_php".  Since you have read the manual,
you will know how to set the appropriate options to get the
configuration you desire.

Good luck,
Craig
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] DHCPd start / stop problem

2005-05-12 Thread C R. Little
have you done a zap?

./dhcp stop
./dhcp zap
./dhcp start

?

-Original Message-
From: Michael Semcheski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 12:36 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] DHCPd start / stop problem


Mark Knecht wrote:
> Does /var/lib/init.d/started/dhcp exist after you attempt to stop the
> dhcp daemon? If so you might try

No, from what I can tell 'stop' works correctly, even if dhcpd was not
started via start-stop-daemon / the init script.

I can not see why start-stop-daemon thinks that dhcp is running.  There
is no pid file in /chroot/dhcp/var/run/dhcp/ or /var/run/dhcp or
/var/lib/init.d/started.

Totally perplexed,

Mike

>>If I do run /etc/init.d/dhcp restart, here's what I get (I turned off
>>--quiet in the start script):
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] init.d # ./dhcp stop
>> * ERROR:  "dhcp" has not yet been started.
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] init.d # ./dhcp restart
>> * Setting ownership on dhcpd.leases...   [ ok ]
>> * Starting chrooted dhcpd... /usr/sbin/dhcpd already running.[ !! ]
>>
>>But, if I 'kill -TERM' the process number from
>>/chroot/dhcp/var/run/dhcp/dhcpd.pid, it says there is No Such Process,
>>and the DHCPd server is not running.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Emerge PHP+ Apache

2005-05-12 Thread C R. Little
I use the package system for a lot just not everything. I'm beginning to use it 
for more stuff. I use to work in Redhat a lot so the package system was not the 
first thing I noticed in gentoo. I really like gentoo a lot, I'm trying to get 
more familiar with the workstation end of it, and at the the same time clean up 
the systems, remove the manually compiled programs and use the package system 
to make them more proficient. 

-Original Message-
From: A. Khattri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 2:33 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge PHP+ Apache


On Thu, 12 May 2005, C R. Little wrote:

> I've been messing with gentoo for around 2 years now and still have not 
> learned the full functionality of emerge.

Wow - one wonders why you picked Gentoo if not for the package system???


-- 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Terminal Client

2005-05-13 Thread C R. Little
emerge -s rdesktop

*  net-misc/grdesktop
  Latest version available: 0.22-r1
  Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
  Size of downloaded files: 418 kB
  Homepage:http://www.nongnu.org/grdesktop/
  Description: Gtk2 frontend for rdesktop
  License: GPL-2

*  net-misc/rdesktop
  Latest version available: 1.4.0-r1
  Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
  Size of downloaded files: 197 kB
  Homepage:http://rdesktop.sourceforge.net/
  Description: A Remote Desktop Protocol Client
  License: GPL-2



-Original Message-
From: Mike Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:04 AM
To: Gentoo Users
Subject: [gentoo-user] Terminal Client


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I have a real need for a terminal client program for gentoo that will
allow me to connect to a Windows machine.  I know Mandrake (Mandriva)
has one which works very nicely, but I would really like to be able
to use gentoo.
Can anybody tell me what I can use for this and where I can find it.

Thanks,
Mike
- --
Mike Noble
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key ID: 0xFFDFC13B
Key fingerprint: 8204 1297 B9AD 0CED 2FCE  1FB0 9491 5824 FFDF C13B
Keyserver: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFChMHolJFYJP/fwTsRAtn9AJ41zldb2JRPu9TeGZf7p5xpPD5L6wCggCvL
pOY7B9eQdDX9NrXyNtO3rDs=
=FzzI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Problem Booting

2005-05-15 Thread C R. Little
I have installed Gentoo to a dual had drive system

/dev/hda1 --> Windows XP Professional

/dev/sda --> Gentoo Install
/dev/sda1 - /boot
/dev/sda3 - /
/dev/sda5 - /usr
/dev/sda6 - /var
/dev/sda7 - /tmp
/dev/sda8 - /home

grub.conf kernel line:
root(hd1,0)
kernel /kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8 root /dev/ram0 real_root=/dev/sda3 init=linuxrc 
vga=0x318 splash=verbose

The liveCD boots and runs. 

when I try to boot the system from grub to the gentoo selection I get 

>>Loading Modules...
>> Mounting Filesystems...
>> Activating udev
>> Determining Root device
block device /dev/sda3 is not a valid root device...

The SDA Device is a Maxtor SATA Drive, I think it's not loading ata_piix which 
the live CD loads. Is this a module or built into the kernel?
I did used genkernel to create my kernel.

Please help

Thanks.
CR Little

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any further dissemination or use of this e-mail is prohibited. If 
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by 
returning it to the sender. You should then delete all copies from your system 
and destroy any hard copies you may have made. Thank you for your cooperation.

 



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Problem Booting

2005-05-15 Thread C R. Little
Here's my grub.conf

default 0
timeout 30
splashimage=(hd1,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz

title=Gentoo Linux 2.6.11-r8
root (hd1,2)
kernel /kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8 root=/dev/ram0 real_root=/dev/dev/sda3 
init=/linuxrc ramdisk_size=8192 vga=0x318 splash=verbose udev
initrd /initrd-2.6.11-gentoo-r8

title=Windows XP Professional
root (hd0,0)
makeactive
chainloader +1


-Original Message-
From: Stanczak Group [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 6:53 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problem Booting


Looks like you need you initrd added to grub.

C R. Little wrote:

>I have installed Gentoo to a dual had drive system
>
>/dev/hda1 --> Windows XP Professional
>
>/dev/sda --> Gentoo Install
>/dev/sda1 - /boot
>/dev/sda3 - /
>/dev/sda5 - /usr
>/dev/sda6 - /var
>/dev/sda7 - /tmp
>/dev/sda8 - /home
>
>grub.conf kernel line:
>root(hd1,0)
>kernel /kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8 root /dev/ram0 real_root=/dev/sda3 
>init=linuxrc vga=0x318 splash=verbose
>
>The liveCD boots and runs. 
>
>when I try to boot the system from grub to the gentoo selection I get 
>
>  
>
>>>Loading Modules...
>>>Mounting Filesystems...
>>>Activating udev
>>>Determining Root device
>>>  
>>>
>block device /dev/sda3 is not a valid root device...
>
>The SDA Device is a Maxtor SATA Drive, I think it's not loading ata_piix which 
>the live CD loads. Is this a module or built into the kernel?
>I did used genkernel to create my kernel.
>
>Please help
>
>Thanks.
>CR Little
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
>
>This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended 
>recipient, any further dissemination or use of this e-mail is prohibited. If 
>you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by 
>returning it to the sender. You should then delete all copies from your system 
>and destroy any hard copies you may have made. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
> 
>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Justin Stanczak
Stanczak Group
812-735-3600

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke

.....__.
./  _/....._/..|_.....
/...\../.__.\./\...__\/.._.\./._..\
\\_\..\..___/|...|..\..|.(..<_>.|.<_>..)
.\__../\___.._\__|../__|..\/.\/..
\/.\/.\/..

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any further dissemination or use of this e-mail is prohibited. If 
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by 
returning it to the sender. You should then delete all copies from your system 
and destroy any hard copies you may have made. Thank you for your cooperation.

 



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Problem Booting

2005-05-15 Thread C R. Little
UPDATE I sent the wrong grub.conf file the right one is below:


default 0
timeout 30
splashimage=(hd1,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz

title=Gentoo Linux 2.6.11-r8
root (hd1,0)
kernel /kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8 root=/dev/ram0 real_root=/dev/sda3 
init=/linuxrc ramdisk_size=8192 vga=0x318 splash=verbose udev
initrd /initrd-2.6.11-gentoo-r8

title=Windows XP Professional
root (hd0,0)
makeactive
chainloader +1



-Original Message-
From: askar ... [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 11:55 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problem Booting


> grub.conf kernel line:
> root(hd1,0)
> kernel /kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8 root /dev/ram0 real_root=/dev/sda3 
> init=linuxrc vga=0x318 splash=verbose
> 
It seems you used genkernel. 
If I follow the gentoo installlation handbook, I could write like:
--
root (hd1,0)
kernel /kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8 root=/dev/ram0 init=/linuxrc
ramdisk=8192 real_root=/dev/sda3 udev
initrd /initrd-2.6.11-gentoo-r8
--
I'm not sure, but try this.

sincerely,
askar

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any further dissemination or use of this e-mail is prohibited. If 
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by 
returning it to the sender. You should then delete all copies from your system 
and destroy any hard copies you may have made. Thank you for your cooperation.

 



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] SATA Boot problem-please help

2005-05-16 Thread C R. Little
Title: SATA Boot problem-please help






grub.conf-


default 0

timeout 30

splashimage=(hd1,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz


title=Gentoo Linux 2.6.11-r8

root (hd1,0)

kernel /kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8 root=/dev/ram0 init=/linuxrc ramdisk_size=8192 vga=0x318 splash=verbose udev

initrd /initrd-2.6.11-gentoo-r8


title=Windows XP Professional

root (hd0,0)

makeactive

chainloader +1


I have installed Gentoo to a dual had drive system


/dev/hda1 --> Windows XP Professional


/dev/sda --> Gentoo Install

/dev/sda1 - /boot

/dev/sda3 - /

/dev/sda5 - /usr

/dev/sda6 - /var

/dev/sda7 - /tmp

/dev/sda8 - /home


The liveCD boots and runs. 


when I try to boot the system from grub to the gentoo selection I get 


>> Loading Modules...(Several SATA Messages)

>> Mounting Filesystems...

>> Activating udev

>> Determining Root device

>> The root block Device is unspecified or not detected. Please specify a device to boot or "shell" for a shell.


The SDA Device is a Maxtor SATA Drive, I think it's not loading ata_piix which the live CD loads. Is this a module or built into the kernel?

I recomplied the kernel so that the Intel PiiX driver was complied in the kernel not as a module.


It's got a lot of STA messages und

I did used genkernel to create my kernel.





RE: [gentoo-user] SATA Boot problem-please help

2005-05-16 Thread C R. Little
That didn't seem to work either. I tried (hd1,3) which should be / but that 
didn't work either

-Original Message-
From: Peter Ruskin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 10:50 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SATA Boot problem-please help


On Monday 16 May 2005 16:19, C R. Little wrote:
> title=Gentoo Linux 2.6.11-r8
> root (hd1,0)
--
You could try changing this to root (hd1,1)
> kernel /kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8 root=/dev/ram0 init=/linuxrc
> ramdisk_size=8192 vga=0x318 splash=verbose udev initrd
> /initrd-2.6.11-gentoo-r8
>
> title=Windows XP Professional
> root (hd0,0)
> makeactive
> chainloader +1
>
> I have installed Gentoo to a dual had drive system
>
> /dev/hda1 --> Windows XP Professional
>
> /dev/sda --> Gentoo Install
> /dev/sda1 - /boot
> /dev/sda3 - /

-- 
Peter

Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.51.19.kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r6.
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+.   gcc(GCC): 3.3.5-20050130.
KDE: 3.4.0. Qt: 3.3.4.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] SATA Boot problem-please help

2005-05-16 Thread C R. Little
kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8 is located on /boot whis /dev/sda1. Which would be 
(hd1,0) for the second Hard drive the first partition. I don't think the 
problem is with grub because it will boot just can't find the root partition. 
which should be /dev/sda3. For some reason I don't think the kernel is loading 
the right drivers for the SATA controller. The LiveCD uses Intel PiiX. which I 
compiled into the kernel. I've found several google groups refering to this 
problem as of yet I haven't found anything on SATA drives, it's been all scsi, 
I'm using SATA not SCSI
I

-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 11:16 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] SATA Boot problem-please help


On Mon, May 16, 2005 4:58 pm, C R. Little said:
> That didn't seem to work either. I tried (hd1,3) which should be / but
> that didn't work either

Go into the GRUB shell and type

find /kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8

to see which GRUB device contains your /boot partition.

looking at your setup, I would have expected it to be (hd1,0), unless the
SATA drive is detected first, in which case it would be (hd0,0).



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] mod_clamav

2005-05-18 Thread C R. Little
I'm not sure if it's in portage but I know you can install it though cpan

-Original Message-
From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 7:16 AM
To: Gentoo-user
Subject: [gentoo-user] mod_clamav


Hi,

I was reading in Sys Admin a article about email content filtering and there 
was a configuration with mod_clamav for scanning of html contains.
I'm unable to find mod_clamav in the portage (possible i din't look good) is it 
under a different name, or do i have to install it from "source", or just wait 
a bit because the ebuild is almost done?

TIA
Patrick
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] SATA Boot problem-please help

2005-05-18 Thread C R. Little
I recomplied all intel and promise modules into the kernel and it loads the 
drivers on boot. But to fix the problem completely. I changed root=/dev/ram0 to 
root=/dev/sda3 and removed real_root=/dev/sda3.

what is is the root=/dev/ram0 for? Is it needed?




-Original Message-
From: Andrew Potter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 4:10 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SATA Boot problem-please help


C R. Little wrote:

>For some reason I don't think the kernel is loading the right drivers for the 
>SATA controller. 
>
I had this problem with my laptop. Compile all the promise and all
theintel device modules into your kernel (Not as modules). Reboot and it
should pick it up. Then start removing modules 1 at a time from the
kernel, recompiling, reboot, etc, until you figure out which one it is
you need. For me it was the Promise TX2/4. I think. Also, SATA driver
support is evolving, so be sure to have the latest kernel available.

Good luck!

--
Andrew Potter
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Install from Hell, now it's bash-2.05b

2005-05-23 Thread C R. Little
Why not use the CFLAGS="-march=pentium2 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" flag? 
and try to remerge

-Original Message-
From: Walter Dnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 12:12 PM
To: Gentoo Users List
Subject: [gentoo-user] Install from Hell, now it's bash-2.05b


  I'm trying to do a stage 1 install on an old 400 mhz PII with 128 megs
of RAM for use as an experimental server.  Compile options are sane...
-O2 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -mmmx -pipe
I'm having extreme problems getting past...  "emerge --emptytree system"
at chapter 6.d of the online install docs at
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?full=1 and will
probably attempt a stage 3 install next time, just to bypass it, unless
somebody can come up with a quick-n-dirty solution to my problems soon.

  First it was blowing up at ncurses.  I tried several times, masking
and unmasking in order to try both regular versions of ncurses and the
~x86 version.  They all blew up at the same point.  I blew that install
away, and started over.  This time around "emerge --emptytree system"
blows up at bash-2.05b.  I didn't see anything on bugzilla that looked
relevant.  Here's the error stuff, with my comments flagged "<<<"

i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSHELL   -I. 
-I/var/tmp/portage/bash-2.05b-r9/work/bash-2.05b -I../.. -I../../lib  -O2 
-march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -mmmx -pipe -DREADLINE_LIBRARY -c ./tilde.c
rm -f xmalloc.o
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSHELL   -I. 
-I/var/tmp/portage/bash-2.05b-r9/work/bash-2.05b -I../.. -I../../lib  -O2 
-march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -mmmx -pipe xmalloc.c
rm -f xmalloc.o <<< note this command
rm -f libhistory.a
ar cr libhistory.a history.o histexpand.o histfile.o histsearch.o shell.o 
savestring.o mbutil.o xmalloc.o
ar: xmalloc.o: No such file or directory <<< Doh
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSHELL   -I. 
-I/var/tmp/portage/bash-2.05b-r9/work/bash-2.05b -I../.. -I../../lib  -O2 
-march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -mmmx -pipe xmalloc.c
make[1]: *** [libhistory.a] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/bash-2.05b-r9/work/bash-2.05b/lib/readline'
make: *** [lib/readline/libhistory.a] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
rm -f compat.o
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSHELL   -I. 
-I/var/tmp/portage/bash-2.05b-r9/work/bash-2.05b -I../.. -I../../lib  -O2 
-march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -mmmx -pipe compat.c
rm -f libreadline.a
ar cr libreadline.a readline.o vi_mode.o funmap.o keymaps.o parens.o search.o 
rltty.o complete.o bind.o isearch.o display.o signals.o util.o kill.o undo.o 
macro.o input.o callback.o terminal.o text.o nls.o misc.o history.o 
histexpand.o histfile.o histsearch.o shell.o savestring.o mbutil.o tilde.o 
xmalloc.o compat.o
test -n "i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib" && i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib libreadline.a
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/bash-2.05b-r9/work/bash-2.05b/lib/readline'

!!! ERROR: app-shells/bash-2.05b-r9 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 99, Exitcode 2
!!! make failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

-- 
Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An infinite number of monkeys pounding away on keyboards will
eventually produce a report showing that Windows is more secure,
and has a lower TCO, than linux.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] ipw2200

2005-05-23 Thread C R. Little
How do I emerge the ~x86 version of the ipw2200 package? with out installing 
all of the ~x86 packages.

I do.
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -Dupv ipw2220 and it wants to recompile almost 
every package.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] ipw2200-IGNORE FOUND PAGE TO FIX

2005-05-23 Thread C R. Little
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=1060314#1060314

-Original Message-
From: C R. Little 
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 12:30 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] ipw2200


How do I emerge the ~x86 version of the ipw2200 package? with out installing 
all of the ~x86 packages.

I do.
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -Dupv ipw2220 and it wants to recompile almost 
every package.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] wine

2005-05-23 Thread C R. Little
I'm setting up my very first install of wine. I'm a bit confused on which one 
to emerge I would like to use Office 2003 Professional and have the ability to 
run games like world of warcraft. Just more "newbie" questions from me.
Thanks for the help with everything.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] wine

2005-05-24 Thread C R. Little
Thanks holly.

-Original Message-
From: A. R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 9:16 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] wine


That was a great post Holly,

very informative,

I also run wine (every day at work) because I need to run Lotus Notes.
And I was wondering about games under wine as well.

Thank you very much.


- AR

On 5/24/05, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> > Thank you for the explanation.  That clears it up.  I don't  play the Doom 
> > series either - I have Soldier of Fortune and Half-LIfe along with some 
> > others.  And I have an Nvidia card .
> >
> Yes, well, I hate you :) . But it is important to mention on behalf of
> any other idio-- umm, unfortunate ATI users-- like myself, that our
> regrettable choice of video card also has an effect on the situation.
> 
> But as to the original question, here are some important resources:
> 
> The Wine application database at http://appdb.winehq.org
> 
> This resource is not well-maintained atm, but it's trying to come back,
> so if you are a Wine user, please register, log in, and update
> application information, or even apply to maintain an application so
> that the developers can easily see if an app regressed after a monthly
> release.
> 
> Wine now also has a Wiki at http://wiki.winehq.org/FrontPage, and the
> "user wiki" is at http://wine-wiki.org/ .
> 
> Naturally, this also needs user support to survive, so any Wine users
> might consider contributing.
> 
> The Transgaming games database at http://transgaming.org/gamesdb/ .
> 
> These resources require you to be a TG subscriber to contribute, but
> anyone can read the data already provided. It's also not that
> well-maintained (a lot of listed games don't have any info because no
> one has tested them yet), but it is at least a place to start. TG also
> has a Wiki, and if the game in question has an entry there, it is linked
> in the gamesdb, so that's nice.
> 
> Codeweavers (Crossover Office) also has an application database at
> 
> http://www.codeweavers.com/compatibility/ .
> 
> But I must say, in my experience with the CX demo, they hardly need
> one-- only one "unsupported" app that I threw at it did not run
> (CloneCD; but it installed fine)-- and that just doesn't run under
> Linux, period, afaict.  I've found Crossover to be really great, pretty
> easy to use, looks like a real program, and if it ran games instead of
> only applications that I have no use for (such as Office and Access and
> the like), I would buy it in a minute. In fact, I'm almost sorry that I
> have no use for it, because it's the kind of thing I *want* to buy, just
> to show my support for how good it is.
> 
> So for the applications that the OP wants to run (namely Office), I
> would recommend it, but if the OP doesn't want to spend any money, I
> would recommend Wine with WineTools:
> 
> http://www.von-thadden.de/Joachim/WineTools/
> 
> which should make it easier to get Office installed and running if you
> really must have it.
> 
> However, WineTools vastly prefers the "last stable for Office" Wine
> version, which is considered by the developer to be 20041019 (which is
> still available in Portage). However, the developer does welcome
> information on any further applications that users successfully install
> and run with WineTools, so they can be included in the supported list,
> which can be found at
> 
> http://www.von-thadden.de/Joachim/WineTools/wt212jo.html
> 
> As you might have guessed, I'm a pretty big Wine-head, and follow
> developments fairly closely. As such, on the whole I would say that no
> version or variant of Wine is (at this time, but that may be changing,
> as soon as within the next quarter) sufficient for all cases, unless you
> have very specific (and limited) needs.
> 
> If you don't play games, for example (or only simple ones not requiring
> DX support), then Crossover (or Wine and WineTools) is probably sufficient.
> 
> If you play games, but only older ones (I'm re-playing Deus Ex and
> Septerra Core atm), then Wine alone may be sufficient, but you may
> require more than one version (an installed binary and a compiled CVS,
> for example), as things have been known to break (regress) from month to
> month.
> 
> On the other hand, Wine can really surprise you sometimes with what runs
> "out of the box"-- on one of my "live on the edge" days, I installed In
> Memoriam (Missing: Since January in Europe), which is only a year and a
> half old, under either Wine 20050111 or 20050211. I didn't really expect
> it to work, especially since the game requires an Internet connection,
> both because you get a FreeWeb account (which enables a password to be
> sent to you so you can even play the game), and because it also contains
> a lot of embedded links in the puzzle graphics to get clues (it's a
> "pre-murder" mystery adventure game, and I was having Adventure Game
> Withdrawal Syndrome, wh

[gentoo-user] gcc upgrade

2005-05-26 Thread C R. Little
when upgrading to a new version of gcc is all you have to do is emerge the 
newer version and it works? the package has a S beside it so how does the 
system know which version to use?

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] gcc upgrade

2005-05-26 Thread C R. Little
if you have a pentium-m processor is it better to upgrade to the newer version 
of gcc or stick with the stable release using the pentium-3 cflag?


-Original Message-
From: Julien Cayzac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 2:12 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc upgrade


On 5/26/05, C R. Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when upgrading to a new version of gcc is all you have to do is emerge the 
> newer version and it works? the package has a S beside it so how does the 
> system know which version to use?

# emerge -u gcc
# gcc-config -l
# gcc-config 

and then, if you you want to use this new version in an already opened
terminal, do:
# env-update
# source /etc/profile

Julien.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list