[gentoo-user] Re: Shouldn't grub setup overwrite lilo in MBR
Heinz Sporn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: bs=466 will make your disk unusable as well. It should be 446 and not 466. You may want to look here first: http://home.teleport.com/~brainy/fat32.htm thanks... I'm still dizzy from trying to follow that a while ago... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Shouldn't grub setup overwrite lilo in MBR
Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No, it says to install the boot code into the first partition of the disk, not the mbr. This would be useful if you use a microsoft mbr (fdisk /mbr, or fixboot from a recovery console), which looks for the 'active' partition to determine which OS to load. You want setup (hd0) Egad... I new that once upon a time. Thanks -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list