RE: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/apr-0.9.12 pulled back by revdep-rebuild
-Original Message- From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It looks like you still have the temporary files from a previous revdep-rebuild run, so you don't get to see the list of broken packages. Add --ignore to the command. Indeed there were some left over files and the ignore option fixed it. Thanks, -- Valmor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
RE: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/apr-0.9.12 pulled back by revdep-rebuild
-Original Message- From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This could be bug #189720 which would mean you need to manually remerge slot 1 of apr and apr-util. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189720 It was actually left over files from a previous revdep-rebuild run. The --ignore flag fixed it. Thanks, -- Valmor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/apr-0.9.12 pulled back by revdep-rebuild
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:17:26 -0500, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote: How do I find out why apr-0.9.12 and apr-util-0.9.12 are pulled back when using revdep-rebuild? [snip] Here is the result from revdep-rebuild. -- -revdep-rebuild --pretend --verbose Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild Checking reverse dependencies... Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update will be emerged. ... snip All prepared. Starting rebuild... emerge --oneshot --pretend --verbose =dev-libs/apr-util-0.9.12 These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild NS ] dev-libs/apr-0.9.12 USE=-ipv6 -urandom 0 kB [ebuild NS ] dev-libs/apr-util-0.9.12 USE=berkdb gdbm -ldap 0 kB It looks like you still have the temporary files from a previous revdep-rebuild run, so you don't get to see the list of broken packages. Add --ignore to the command. -- Neil Bothwick Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/apr-0.9.12 pulled back by revdep-rebuild
On Saturday 17 November 2007 06:17:26 de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote: How do I find out why apr-0.9.12 and apr-util-0.9.12 are pulled back when using revdep-rebuild? What I have currently is: This could be bug #189720 which would mean you need to manually remerge slot 1 of apr and apr-util. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189720 -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
