Re: [Gimp-user] renaming the gimp

2004-11-07 Thread Jakub Friedl (lists)
> remember. So what do YOU think, does the GIMP need a
> name change?

No. The name is very nice and many people already know it.
It is a good brand. Even people that never used it often heard about
the Gimp.
And the name is very easy to remember. It is only 4 letters short
and it has a meaning - Gnu Image Manipulation Program.
So I do not get what you do not like about the name.
There are lots of free programs that do not have ideal names
(some are really obscure), but the Gimp is one I really like.

Jakub Friedl
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] renaming the gimp

2004-11-07 Thread Jakub Friedl (lists)
> But you can do a demo and it is better than they have a false knowledge
> about it!
Insightful remark. Gimp is the Gimp. Not a Photoshop clone. It
shouldn't be the same and its name shouldn't imply it. It is an
original software.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] renaming the gimp

2004-11-07 Thread Jakub Friedl (lists)
> THe name should imply/tell something about the
> application...GIMP doesn't say anything to me other

With good brands it happens often the other way - Xerox comes to mind
immediatelly. But there are many more such examples.

My experience is that many people around me mix all the similar names
- Photoshop, PhotoPaint, Paint Shop Pro etc...

This happens to me every other day:
"I would like to fix those red eyes, how do I do it?"
"What program do you use?"
"Adobe PhotoPaint."

or

"Photoshop Pro"

This does not happen with the Gimp.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Not using PNG transparency

2004-11-09 Thread Jakub Friedl (lists)
> nice shade will become a black block, and the antialiasing is lost.
this is limitation of gif format, nothing can be done about it
pixels in gif can be only full opaque or full transparent

> remains an option), I don't know how to replace it with a color (like
> white) in images like wilber_the_gimp2.png where the transparency is
> progressive.
make a layer below the transparent image (background) with required
color and flatten the image then

> Would anyone help me / point me to ressources to solve either of these
> options?

the most elegant solution is to send png images with transparency to
modern browsers and gif or nontransparent image to that microsoft
garbage. if you place images on a page via CSS it is not hard to
achieve (use child selectors for the things ie should not see)


-- 
---
Jakub Friedl * Cygnis Insignis
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] image scale (2.2) - missing print size

2004-11-09 Thread Jakub Friedl (lists)
> #2 Putting it into its own menu entry (Sven's idea below) because...

I vote for the #2.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Tiff, and Jpeg Talk Part 2

2004-11-11 Thread Jakub Friedl (lists)
> the advantages would be ? what more color depth? better correction?
> then end size all would be 5x7 inches.

the advantage is that with tiff you get original high quality image,
while with jpg you are using compressing method based on throwing away
small images details. it is done cleverly so that it damages the image
in a way, that is for human eye not very noticeable, but still, you
are loosing some information. it depends on a image and what you want
to do with it, wheter it is too bad or not.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Inquire ?

2004-11-14 Thread Jakub Friedl (lists)
> Gimp does 16 Bit Color and 8 Bit Gray ( Right? )
> no 24 bit or 32 bit?

24/32 bit colour (RGB/RGBA) or 8 bit grey - in other words 8 bits per channel

> The New Version ( Gimp 3.0 ) Will do Gegl, from my understanding that
> suppose to handle any bit up to 48 Bit? & 16 Bit Gray ?

Gegl based Gimp will support at least 16 bits per chanell (16 bit
grey, 48 bit RGB)
such a gimp would be named at least 3.0, but it is possible that 3.0
would not include full gegl support and we will wait for a higher
version (originally, 2.0 was supposed to be Gegl based)
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user