[Gluster-users] Your Feedback Requested: New gluster.org design

[John Mark Walker]

Hi guys,

We are almost ready to launch a redesign of 
www.gluster.org - please take a look at what's in 
store on http://staging.gluster.org

We wanted to accomplish a few things with this redesign:

- look friendlier and cleaner
- give a better view of what's happening in the GlusterFS community
- present clear options for getting more help


Please let me know if we missed anything, or if there's something you'd like to 
see. If we can't get it in the initial launch, we'll plan for it down the road.

Thanks!
John Mark Walker
Gluster Community Guy


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] HW raid or not

[Jeff Anderson-Lee]

+1

On 8/8/2011 3:40 PM, Liam Slusser wrote:

I'm in the HW raid camp.  Mostly because gluster is not block level,
so with large quantities of files replication can take days or weeks.
In my case a rebuild/resync can take weeks because of how many
files/directories I have in my cluster.

With hardware RAID I can just replace the disk and a rebuild happens
automatically and very quickly.

liam

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Gabriel-Adrian Samfira
  wrote:

We use raw disks with our setup. Gluster takes care of the replication
part, so RAID would be useless for us. Performance wise, you are
better off just adding a new brick and let gluster do the rest.

Best regards,
Gabriel

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Uwe Kastens  wrote:

Hi,

I know, that there is no general answer to this question :)

Is it better to use HW Raid or LVM as gluster backend or raw disks?

Regards

Uwe


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] HW raid or not

[Liam Slusser]

I'm in the HW raid camp.  Mostly because gluster is not block level,
so with large quantities of files replication can take days or weeks.
In my case a rebuild/resync can take weeks because of how many
files/directories I have in my cluster.

With hardware RAID I can just replace the disk and a rebuild happens
automatically and very quickly.

liam

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Gabriel-Adrian Samfira
 wrote:
> We use raw disks with our setup. Gluster takes care of the replication
> part, so RAID would be useless for us. Performance wise, you are
> better off just adding a new brick and let gluster do the rest.
>
> Best regards,
> Gabriel
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Uwe Kastens  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know, that there is no general answer to this question :)
>>
>> Is it better to use HW Raid or LVM as gluster backend or raw disks?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users@gluster.org
>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>>
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster usable as open source solution

[Liam Slusser]

Glad I could help, Uwe.

We do use hardware RAID inside the servers.  The reason being is
because gluster isn't block level so doing a remirror/resync with 80+
million files takes weeks - so if we lose a hard drive the rebuild
time would be unacceptable.  With hardware raid a rebuild takes only a
day or two.

We access our clusters mostly via the native fuse gluster client
because performance via the NFS client is somewhat slow.  However we
do have a few clients that connect via NFS so we can mount readonly or
that don't require a lot of performance.

liam

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Uwe Kastens  wrote:
> Hello Liam,
>
> Thank you for sharing information. This is very kind and helpful.
>
> Indeed there are some questions:
> - Are you working with hardware raid inside the server?
> - How are you acessing the storage? NFS/gluster native?
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
>
> 2011/8/4 Liam Slusser 
>>
>> I run two Gluster clusters in a very production roll using open source
>> Gluster, all supported in-house mostly by myself.
>>
>> We have a 4-node 240tb after raid (576tb raw) cluster supporting a
>> farm of audio transcoders.  This one was built not so much for speed
>> (its not very speedy), but to be reliable and cheap.  Over the last
>> two years we've had a few small issues but nothing major.  Very
>> reliable.  All built on commodity hardware (Supermicro chassis's,
>> Seagate 7.2k desktop harddrives).
>>
>> I also run a smaller 6-node 120tb (432tb raw) as storage for a pool of
>> public facing apache webservers.  This smaller cluster serves content
>> to feed our CDN providers which feeds all our users.  We can saturate
>> a gigabit line (with 2-3meg http objects) without issues.  (Same
>> Supermicro chassis's and Seagate 7.2k desktop harddrives)  This
>> cluster has never gone down in the last two years it has been running.
>>
>> Our two homebuilt Gluster clusters replaced nearly 1/4 of a million
>> dollars in Isilon hardware for less then the cost of the Isilon annual
>> support contract while doubling the space at the same time.  It has
>> saved our company hundreds of thousands of dollars and has been hugely
>> successful.
>>
>> You're welcome to email me offline if you would like more information.
>>
>> liam
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Uwe Kastens 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I looked at gluster over the past year. It looks nice but the commercial
>> > option is not so interesting, since it is not possible to evaluate a
>> > storage
>> > solution within 30 days. More than one any other storage platform its a
>> > matter of trust, if the scaling is working.
>> >
>> > So my questions to this mailinglist are:
>> > - Anybody using the open source edition in a bigger production
>> > environment?
>> > How is the expierence over a longer time?
>> > - Since gluster seems only to offer support within the enterprise
>> > version.
>> > Anybody out there how is supporting the open source edition?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Uwe
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Gluster-users mailing list
>> > Gluster-users@gluster.org
>> > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >
>> >
>
>
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] help! - cant bring 1 of 4 servers up..

[paul simpson]

pranith - a huge and heartfelt thanks for your super prompt attention.  a
very scary event turned into a non-event.  :)

regards,

-p


On 8 August 2011 18:35, Pranith Kumar K  wrote:

> **
> After debugging the problem with paul on IRC, we found that because his
> disk had no free space, the subsequent writes on one of the peer files (used
> for recovering run-time information) failed so the file became empty.
> Because of this glusterd could not restore that peer so it is not
> re-starting successfully. We copied the contents of that file from other
> peer in the cluster to the problematic one. Then glusterd started
> successfully.
>
> Pranith.
>
>
> On 08/08/2011 10:32 PM, paul simpson wrote:
>
> hi pranith,
>
>  many thanks for the super quick reply!  i've attached the files asked for
> - be keen to hear your thoughts.  i'm stumped - and scared!
>
>  regards,
>
>  paul
>
>
>
>
> On 8 August 2011 17:59, Pranith Kumar K  wrote:
>
>>  zip /etc/glusterd and send across
>>
>> Pranith
>>
>> On 08/08/2011 10:15 PM, paul simpson wrote:
>>
>>  hi gluster gurus,
>>
>>  i have 4 servers g1,g2,g3 & g4 with 24T each running gluster 3.1.5 on
>> opensuse 11.3.  they have been running well for the last few months in a
>> distributed+replicated setup.
>>
>>  i just found that the nfs log had filled up my root disk of g4 (my bad).
>>  so, i removed the log file - and a couple of other large ones and restored
>> a load of disk space.  however, gluster 3.1.5 will not restart on this
>> machine!!  it err's out with http://pastebin.com/646W8zjg
>>
>>  i've searched this forum, and searched the documentation.  however, i
>> cant see anything that mentions this situation.  please can anyone help -
>> i'm quite concerned about my system.  this is a live server with live data.
>>  i need to get g4 up and running and back into sync ASAP.
>>
>>  many thanks in advance,
>>
>>  -paul
>>
>>  ps - the following command just hangs:
>>
>> g4:~ # gluster peer status
>>
>>
>>  ..however, on g3 it works:
>>
>>  g3:/etc/glusterd/logs # gluster peer status
>>  Number of Peers: 3
>>
>>   Hostname: 10.0.0.12
>>  Uuid: 8061196e-a075-42f6-89f5-1f60281485f5
>>  State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
>>
>>   Hostname: g2
>>  Uuid: 154d5c46-f62f-4e9c-a328-443e30cadf4e
>>  State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
>>
>>   Hostname: g4
>>  Uuid: 62365589-61f8-479f-bb50-11519beba045
>>  State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected)
>>
>> ..i've also tried rebooting the machine - and nothing changes.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Gluster-users mailing 
>> listGluster-users@gluster.orghttp://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>>
>>
>
>
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] help! - cant bring 1 of 4 servers up..

[John Mark Walker]

Pranith - thanks for following up!

-JM



From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] on 
behalf of Pranith Kumar K [prani...@gluster.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 10:35 AM
To: paul simpson; gluster-users
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] help! - cant bring 1 of 4 servers up..

After debugging the problem with paul on IRC, we found that because his disk 
had no free space, the subsequent writes on one of the peer files (used for 
recovering run-time information) failed so the file became empty. Because of 
this glusterd could not restore that peer so it is not re-starting 
successfully. We copied the contents of that file from other peer in the 
cluster to the problematic one. Then glusterd started successfully.

Pranith.

On 08/08/2011 10:32 PM, paul simpson wrote:
hi pranith,

many thanks for the super quick reply!  i've attached the files asked for - be 
keen to hear your thoughts.  i'm stumped - and scared!

regards,

paul




On 8 August 2011 17:59, Pranith Kumar K 
mailto:prani...@gluster.com>> wrote:
zip /etc/glusterd and send across

Pranith

On 08/08/2011 10:15 PM, paul simpson wrote:
hi gluster gurus,

i have 4 servers g1,g2,g3 & g4 with 24T each running gluster 3.1.5 on opensuse 
11.3.  they have been running well for the last few months in a 
distributed+replicated setup.

i just found that the nfs log had filled up my root disk of g4 (my bad).  so, i 
removed the log file - and a couple of other large ones and restored a load of 
disk space.  however, gluster 3.1.5 will not restart on this machine!!  it 
err's out with http://pastebin.com/646W8zjg

i've searched this forum, and searched the documentation.  however, i cant see 
anything that mentions this situation.  please can anyone help - i'm quite 
concerned about my system.  this is a live server with live data.  i need to 
get g4 up and running and back into sync ASAP.

many thanks in advance,

-paul

ps - the following command just hangs:
g4:~ # gluster peer status

..however, on g3 it works:
g3:/etc/glusterd/logs # gluster peer status
Number of Peers: 3

Hostname: 10.0.0.12
Uuid: 8061196e-a075-42f6-89f5-1f60281485f5
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)

Hostname: g2
Uuid: 154d5c46-f62f-4e9c-a328-443e30cadf4e
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)

Hostname: g4
Uuid: 62365589-61f8-479f-bb50-11519beba045
State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected)
..i've also tried rebooting the machine - and nothing changes.


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] help! - cant bring 1 of 4 servers up..

[Pranith Kumar K]

After debugging the problem with paul on IRC, we found that because his 
disk had no free space, the subsequent writes on one of the peer files 
(used for recovering run-time information) failed so the file became 
empty. Because of this glusterd could not restore that peer so it is not 
re-starting successfully. We copied the contents of that file from other 
peer in the cluster to the problematic one. Then glusterd started 
successfully.


Pranith.

On 08/08/2011 10:32 PM, paul simpson wrote:

hi pranith,

many thanks for the super quick reply!  i've attached the files asked 
for - be keen to hear your thoughts.  i'm stumped - and scared!


regards,

paul




On 8 August 2011 17:59, Pranith Kumar K > wrote:


zip /etc/glusterd and send across

Pranith

On 08/08/2011 10:15 PM, paul simpson wrote:

hi gluster gurus,

i have 4 servers g1,g2,g3 & g4 with 24T each running gluster
3.1.5 on opensuse 11.3.  they have been running well for the last
few months in a distributed+replicated setup.

i just found that the nfs log had filled up my root disk of g4
(my bad).  so, i removed the log file - and a couple of other
large ones and restored a load of disk space.  however, gluster
3.1.5 will not restart on this machine!!  it err's out with
http://pastebin.com/646W8zjg

i've searched this forum, and searched the documentation.
 however, i cant see anything that mentions this situation.
 please can anyone help - i'm quite concerned about my system.
 this is a live server with live data.  i need to get g4 up and
running and back into sync ASAP.

many thanks in advance,

-paul

ps - the following command just hangs:

g4:~ # gluster peer status


..however, on g3 it works:

g3:/etc/glusterd/logs # gluster peer status
Number of Peers: 3

Hostname: 10.0.0.12
Uuid: 8061196e-a075-42f6-89f5-1f60281485f5
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)

Hostname: g2
Uuid: 154d5c46-f62f-4e9c-a328-443e30cadf4e
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)

Hostname: g4
Uuid: 62365589-61f8-479f-bb50-11519beba045
State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected)

..i've also tried rebooting the machine - and nothing changes.


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org  
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users





___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] help! - cant bring 1 of 4 servers up..

[Pranith Kumar K]

zip /etc/glusterd and send across

Pranith
On 08/08/2011 10:15 PM, paul simpson wrote:

hi gluster gurus,

i have 4 servers g1,g2,g3 & g4 with 24T each running gluster 3.1.5 on 
opensuse 11.3.  they have been running well for the last few months in 
a distributed+replicated setup.


i just found that the nfs log had filled up my root disk of g4 (my 
bad).  so, i removed the log file - and a couple of other large ones 
and restored a load of disk space.  however, gluster 3.1.5 will not 
restart on this machine!!  it err's out with http://pastebin.com/646W8zjg


i've searched this forum, and searched the documentation.  however, i 
cant see anything that mentions this situation.  please can anyone 
help - i'm quite concerned about my system.  this is a live server 
with live data.  i need to get g4 up and running and back into sync ASAP.


many thanks in advance,

-paul

ps - the following command just hangs:

g4:~ # gluster peer status


..however, on g3 it works:

g3:/etc/glusterd/logs # gluster peer status
Number of Peers: 3

Hostname: 10.0.0.12
Uuid: 8061196e-a075-42f6-89f5-1f60281485f5
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)

Hostname: g2
Uuid: 154d5c46-f62f-4e9c-a328-443e30cadf4e
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)

Hostname: g4
Uuid: 62365589-61f8-479f-bb50-11519beba045
State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected)

..i've also tried rebooting the machine - and nothing changes.


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] help! - cant bring 1 of 4 servers up..

[paul simpson]

hi gluster gurus,

i have 4 servers g1,g2,g3 & g4 with 24T each running gluster 3.1.5 on
opensuse 11.3.  they have been running well for the last few months in a
distributed+replicated setup.

i just found that the nfs log had filled up my root disk of g4 (my bad).
 so, i removed the log file - and a couple of other large ones and restored
a load of disk space.  however, gluster 3.1.5 will not restart on this
machine!!  it err's out with http://pastebin.com/646W8zjg

i've searched this forum, and searched the documentation.  however, i cant
see anything that mentions this situation.  please can anyone help - i'm
quite concerned about my system.  this is a live server with live data.  i
need to get g4 up and running and back into sync ASAP.

many thanks in advance,

-paul

ps - the following command just hangs:

g4:~ # gluster peer status


..however, on g3 it works:

g3:/etc/glusterd/logs # gluster peer status
Number of Peers: 3

Hostname: 10.0.0.12
Uuid: 8061196e-a075-42f6-89f5-1f60281485f5
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)

Hostname: g2
Uuid: 154d5c46-f62f-4e9c-a328-443e30cadf4e
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)

Hostname: g4
Uuid: 62365589-61f8-479f-bb50-11519beba045
State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected)

..i've also tried rebooting the machine - and nothing changes.
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] HW raid or not

[Burnash, James]

I would agree with this.

While GlusterFS mirroring is good on a server to server level, it's not as 
robust (provably on my installation) as HW RAID due to continuing GlusterFS  
issues with replication and extended attributes (through versions 3.2.2). 
That's not to say that the server replication is rubbish - it's just that there 
are edge cases for which bugs have already been submitted that affect file 
integrity from a mounted GlusterFS point of view.

James Burnash
Unix Engineer
Knight Capital Group


-Original Message-
From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org 
[mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Stratton
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 11:04 AM
To: Uwe Kastens
Cc: Gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] HW raid or not

On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Uwe Kastens wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I know, that there is no general answer to this question :)
>
> Is it better to use HW Raid or LVM as gluster backend or raw disks?

HW Raid.


><>
Nathan StrattonCTO, BlinkMind, Inc.
nathan at robotics.net nathan at blinkmind.com
http://www.robotics.nethttp://www.blinkmind.com
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the 
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or 
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this in error, please immediately notify me and permanently delete the 
original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. E-mail 
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender 
therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents 
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
NOTICE REGARDING PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY Knight Capital Group may, at its 
discretion, monitor and review the content of all e-mail communications. 
http://www.knight.com
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] HW raid or not

[Nathan Stratton]

On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Uwe Kastens wrote:


Hi,

I know, that there is no general answer to this question :)

Is it better to use HW Raid or LVM as gluster backend or raw disks?


HW Raid.



<>

Nathan StrattonCTO, BlinkMind, Inc.
nathan at robotics.net nathan at blinkmind.com
http://www.robotics.nethttp://www.blinkmind.com
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] scrub as in zfs

[Joe Landman]

On 08/08/2011 04:00 AM, Uwe Kastens wrote:

Hi again,

If one thinks about a large amount of data, maybe as a replacement
for tapes. Will auto heal of gluster help with data corruption
problems? I would expect that, but only, if the files are accessed on
a regular basis.

As far as I  have seen, there is no regular scrub mechanism like in
zfs?


In hardware and software RAID, this mechanism exists.


--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics, Inc.
email: land...@scalableinformatics.com
web  : http://scalableinformatics.com
   http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster
phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
fax  : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] HW raid or not

[Gabriel-Adrian Samfira]

We use raw disks with our setup. Gluster takes care of the replication
part, so RAID would be useless for us. Performance wise, you are
better off just adding a new brick and let gluster do the rest.

Best regards,
Gabriel

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Uwe Kastens  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know, that there is no general answer to this question :)
>
> Is it better to use HW Raid or LVM as gluster backend or raw disks?
>
> Regards
>
> Uwe
>
>
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Fwd: nfs.rpc-auth-allow : not working in 3.2.1 (but two patches fix that)

[Benjamin Cleyet-Marrel]

Hello,

Just wanted an update on this one .
We submitted a patch for that against 3.1 then again against 3.2.0 and 3.2.1
But it seems that you keep forgetting it in the next release .

This is a claimed feature, it is listed in the documentation, in the 
wiki, in the web site. But it is just not working. And has never been.


Why can't this be fixed for once especially when you look at the patch: 
A typo ( - instead of. ) seriously can't you get it throught to the trunk.


So what is the status of this bug ?
Is it going to be fixed in 3.3 ?
Are you going to test it ?

Thanks

--
Benjamin Cleyet-Marrel
http://outsourcing.openwide.fr


On 01/08/2011 11:10, Cedric Lagneau wrote:

same in 3.2.2.

i.e. #gluster volume set preprod nfs.rpc-auth-allow "192.168.10.*" : not 
working, *ANY* nfs client ips can mount the volume.

we have submit a patch, then use patch from others. But why i'ts not commited 
to a release ? wiki explain this feature.


thanks,


- Mail transféré -

Hi,

I'm back with nfs.rpc-auth-allow not working in all glusterfs
version.

This two patches have fixed issue in 3.2.0:
http://patches.gluster.com/patch/7104/
http://patches.gluster.com/patch/7233/


They have not be commited to 3.2.1 so nfs.rpc-auth-allow is broken
for now.

To fix that i need to apply:

__patches 7104__ adapted to 3.2.1:
# diff -u glusterd-volgen.c.3.2.1 glusterd-volgen.c.ok
--- glusterd-volgen.c.3.2.1 2011-06-15 17:18:43.0 +0200
+++ glusterd-volgen.c.ok2011-06-15 17:18:09.0 +0200
@@ -1622,7 +1622,7 @@
  if ( !volinfo || !volinfo->volname)
  return 0;

-if (! strcmp (vme->option, "!nfs.rpc-auth-addr-allow")) {
+if (! strcmp (vme->option, "!nfs.rpc-auth.addr.allow")) {
  ret = gf_asprintf (&aa, "rpc-auth.addr.%s.allow",
  volinfo->volname);

@@ -1635,7 +1635,7 @@
  return -1;
  }

-if (! strcmp (vme->option, "!nfs.rpc-auth-addr-reject")) {
+if (! strcmp (vme->option, "!nfs.rpc-auth.addr.reject")) {
  ret = gf_asprintf (&aa, "rpc-auth.addr.%s.reject",
  volinfo->volname);


__patches 7233__ as it because there are no change in
xlators/nfs/lib/src/rpcsvc.c file between 3.2.0 and 3.2.1.


Why this two patches have not been commited in 3.2.1 release ?


thanks,


regards,


--

Cédric Lagneau
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Somebody build glusterfs 3.2 with macosx sucessfully

[Anand Avati]

The current releases do not support native gluster client on Mac OS. Please
use NFS for now.

Avati

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:39 PM, paul simpson  wrote:

> Also very keen to hear the answer to this...
> On Aug 8, 2011 7:43 AM, "Uwe Kastens"  wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > So, ist macos X supported as native glusterfs client?
> > Yes or No?
> >
> > Kind Regards
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> >
> > 2011/8/5 John Mark Walker 
> >
> >> Hi Luis,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't referring to the client, but I
> >> should have been more specific - I misunderstood the context of the
> thread.
> >>
> >> Yes, on the glusterfs client side, we have multiple users and customers
> >> happily using Mac OS X.
> >>
> >> -JM
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *From:* Luis Cerezo [l...@luiscerezo.org]
> >> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2011 1:09 PM
> >> *To:* John Mark Walker
> >> *Cc:* Uwe Kastens; gluster-users@gluster.org
> >>
> >> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Somebody build glusterfs 3.2 with macosx
> >> sucessfully
> >>
> >> paying customer here and our users will use a mac gluster client.
> >>
> >>
> >> -luis
> >> On Aug 5, 2011, at 3:05 PM, John Mark Walker wrote:
> >>
> >> The "official" word is that we don't support OSX. However, we would
> >> certainly welcome a community effort to help out, if enough people are
> >> interested.
> >>
> >> -JM
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >> Portal: http://www.gluster.org/
> >> Get help: http://community.gluster.org/
> >> Report bugs: http://bugs.gluster.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *From:* gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [
> >> gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] on behalf of Uwe Kastens [
> >> kiste...@googlemail.com]
> >> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2011 12:55 PM
> >> *To:* gluster-users@gluster.org
> >> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Somebody build glusterfs 3.2 with macosx
> >> sucessfully
> >>
> >> Looks like there is an fix on github available
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/e719518e561033af0ffd07d0c8ad7d15fe89#xlators/features/marker/src/marker.h
> >>
> >>
> >> 2011/8/5 paul simpson 
> >>
> >>> any official word here? native gluster on the mac would be great...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 5 August 2011 16:55, Uwe Kastens  wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi,
> 
>  there is a open bug which seems to prevent one from compiling on
> macosx
>  Darwin und Lion.
> 
>  http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3292
> 
> 
> 
>  2011/8/5 Amar Tumballi 
> 
> > xcode components. I had worked on a Portfile during 2.0.x time to
> create
> > a .dmg package. At present we are not working on Mac, and hence not
> tested
> > in long time.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Uwe Kastens  >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Are you using the xcode components (gcc, make) or ports?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Uwe
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
>  ___
>  Gluster-users mailing list
>  Gluster-users@gluster.org
>  http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 
> 
> >>>
> >> ___
> >> Gluster-users mailing list
> >> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> >> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Luis E. Cerezo
> >>
> >> http://www.luiscerezo.org
> >> http://twitter.com/luiscerezo
> >> http://flickr.com/photos/luiscerezo
> >> photos for sale:
> >> http://photos.luiscerezo.org
> >> Voice: 412 223 7396
> >>
> >>
>
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Somebody build glusterfs 3.2 with macosx sucessfully

[paul simpson]

Also very keen to hear the answer to this...
On Aug 8, 2011 7:43 AM, "Uwe Kastens"  wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> So, ist macos X supported as native glusterfs client?
> Yes or No?
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Uwe
>
>
> 2011/8/5 John Mark Walker 
>
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't referring to the client, but I
>> should have been more specific - I misunderstood the context of the
thread.
>>
>> Yes, on the glusterfs client side, we have multiple users and customers
>> happily using Mac OS X.
>>
>> -JM
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Luis Cerezo [l...@luiscerezo.org]
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2011 1:09 PM
>> *To:* John Mark Walker
>> *Cc:* Uwe Kastens; gluster-users@gluster.org
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Somebody build glusterfs 3.2 with macosx
>> sucessfully
>>
>> paying customer here and our users will use a mac gluster client.
>>
>>
>> -luis
>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 3:05 PM, John Mark Walker wrote:
>>
>> The "official" word is that we don't support OSX. However, we would
>> certainly welcome a community effort to help out, if enough people are
>> interested.
>>
>> -JM
>>
>>
>> 
>> Portal: http://www.gluster.org/
>> Get help: http://community.gluster.org/
>> Report bugs: http://bugs.gluster.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [
>> gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] on behalf of Uwe Kastens [
>> kiste...@googlemail.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2011 12:55 PM
>> *To:* gluster-users@gluster.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Somebody build glusterfs 3.2 with macosx
>> sucessfully
>>
>> Looks like there is an fix on github available
>>
>>
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/e719518e561033af0ffd07d0c8ad7d15fe89#xlators/features/marker/src/marker.h
>>
>>
>> 2011/8/5 paul simpson 
>>
>>> any official word here? native gluster on the mac would be great...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 August 2011 16:55, Uwe Kastens  wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 there is a open bug which seems to prevent one from compiling on macosx
 Darwin und Lion.

 http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3292



 2011/8/5 Amar Tumballi 

> xcode components. I had worked on a Portfile during 2.0.x time to
create
> a .dmg package. At present we are not working on Mac, and hence not
tested
> in long time.
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Uwe Kastens 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are you using the xcode components (gcc, make) or ports?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>>
>

 ___
 Gluster-users mailing list
 Gluster-users@gluster.org
 http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


>>>
>> ___
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users@gluster.org
>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>>
>>
>> Luis E. Cerezo
>>
>> http://www.luiscerezo.org
>> http://twitter.com/luiscerezo
>> http://flickr.com/photos/luiscerezo
>> photos for sale:
>> http://photos.luiscerezo.org
>> Voice: 412 223 7396
>>
>>
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] scrub as in zfs

[Pavan T C]

On Monday 08 August 2011 01:30 PM, Uwe Kastens wrote:

Hi again,

If one thinks about a large amount of data, maybe as a replacement for tapes. 
Will auto heal of gluster help with data corruption problems? I would expect 
that, but only, if the files are accessed on a regular basis.

As far as I  have seen, there is no regular scrub mechanism like in zfs?


Right. Not for now. With proative/Background self-heal, you will get 
something similar to that. Stay tuned.


Pavan



Kind Regards

Uwe Kastens
kiste...@googlemail.com



___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] How to disable the self-heal?

[LiHang]

HI ALL:

 I find a problem when testing the replication volume .

 There are two node with the replication volume and I off one of them
.Everything is ok. And then I recover the power-off node. The self-heal will
be triggered. The file in the recovering node will be locked .And most IO
are used in the self-heal.

 I'd like to disable the self-heal to solve this problem. Tell me
how to do . Thanks

 




Add: Rm.2503, CITY Gateway, No. 398 Caoxi Road North.  

   Shanghai, China 20030

Mobile: +86-136-0195-0405

  Tel:+86-21-33688277   Fax: +86-21-33688012

Email:   lih...@netopcomputing.com

Http:   www.netopcomputing.com




Easy Supercomputing & Easy Visualization. 

 

___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] scrub as in zfs

[Uwe Kastens]

Hi again, 

If one thinks about a large amount of data, maybe as a replacement for tapes. 
Will auto heal of gluster help with data corruption problems? I would expect 
that, but only, if the files are accessed on a regular basis. 

As far as I  have seen, there is no regular scrub mechanism like in zfs?

Kind Regards

Uwe Kastens
kiste...@googlemail.com



___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] HW raid or not

[Daniel Müller]

I am using raid 5 1 spare disk without any problem on centos 5.6


EDV Daniel Müller

Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen 
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de 

Von: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org
[mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] Im Auftrag von Uwe Kastens
Gesendet: Montag, 8. August 2011 08:55
An: Gluster-users@gluster.org
Betreff: [Gluster-users] HW raid or not

Hi,

I know, that there is no general answer to this question :)

Is it better to use HW Raid or LVM as gluster backend or raw disks?

Regards

Uwe

___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users