Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-17 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



majid hasan wrote:
Okay, so I divided the procedure in three steps, and this does produce 
output immediately. But it seems that it doesn't put second molecule 
inside the box.

Here is the what I am doing:

1. editconf -f ssgcg.pdb -o ssgcg.gro -box 20 20 20 
2. genbox -cp ssgcg.gro -ci cntcapped.pdb -nmol 1 -o cntdna.gro

3. editconf -f spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro -box 20 20 20
4. genbox -cp cntdna.gro -cs spc216.gro -o solvated.gro
5. editconf -f solvated.gro -o solvated.pdb

I tried cubic boxes of different lenghts (10, 20, 100), but when I see 
the final file in solvated.pdb in rasmol, it seems that it puts dna, and 
cnt at a distance equal to the specified length of the box, and the 
water molecules are all clustered around dna only.


I also tried to create a box of lenght 100 20 20 and align dna along 1 0 
0, but I still got the similar final output.


My question is, what determines the distance between molecules inside 
the box, and how can I make sure that they are placed at a reasonable 
distance inside the solvent?




I'm not entirely clear on what you're seeing, but you need to omit step 3 above. 
 Defining a huge box for a small cube of solvent will lead to incorrect 
solvation.  genbox will read a solvent configuration and create identical blocks 
until the unit cell is full.  Defining a larger box in which you place the 
solvent prevents this from working.


Positions of molecules inserted with genbox -ci -nmol are random.  If you want 
to define a specific orientation or position in the box, use editconf 
-center/-translate/-rotate as necessary.


-Justin


Thanks,
Majid



*From:* Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
*To:* Gromacs Users' List gmx-users@gromacs.org
*Sent:* Sat, April 16, 2011 6:19:39 PM
*Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete



Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
 
 
  majid hasan wrote:
  Dear All,
 
  I am trying to add a single strand dna, and single walled carbon 
nanotube in a box using the genbox command. After typing following command:

 
  genbox -cp cntcapped.pdb -cs spc216.gro -ci ssgcg.gro -nmol 1 -box 2 
2 2 -o cntdna.gro,

 
  I get: Reading solute configuration
 
  Containing 168 atoms in 1 residues
  Initialising van der waals distances...
 
  WARNING: masses and atomic (Van der Waals) radii will be determined
   based on residue and atom names. These numbers can deviate
   from the correct mass and radius of the atom type.
 
  Reading solvent configuration
  Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situation
  solvent configuration contains 648 atoms in 216 residues
 
 
  and then it takes forever to produce output.
 
  I tried to generate an output with just one molecule in solvent 
(spc216.gro), and I ran into same problem. I suspect something is wrong 
with my solvent input (file attached). I copied this file from 
gromacs/tutor/water folder, though it looks reasonable when I view I 
view the corresponding .pdb file in rasmol (I created .gro file from 
.pdb file using editconf -f spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro).

 
  Could anyone please guide me about possible issues, and how to 
resolve them?

 
 
  You're asking genbox to do far too many things at once.  Divide your 
procedure into steps:

 
  1. Set a box size using editconf for either the CNT or DNA.

I should say a sensible box size - a 2x2x2 box barely accommodates the 
smallest DNA fragment, and then certainly does not leave any room at all 
to accommodate the minimum image convention.


http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Minimum_Image_Convention

-Justin

-- 

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu http://vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


-- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org 
mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org

http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org 
mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use

Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-17 Thread majid hasan
Okay, so here is an output attached, for cubic box of length 10 (I removed some 
atoms to reduce the size below 50kB). 


Actually,  the carbon atoms are all placed at   0x4,  0 y 2.5,0z3.5. 
While solvent and DNA atoms are in the region  4x,y,z6. So only DNA is 
solvated, while CNT is just lying  outside. Though I might have placed solvent 
in a cube of length 10  (using: editconf -f spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro -box 10 10 
10), could this  be the reason?

I am at the moment trying to solvate the whole  system (in a cubic box of 20) 
without specifying -box in editconf -o  spc216.gro, but this is taking long, 
its 
running for about half an hour   after reaching this point: Reading solvent  
configuration Quotation Solvent configuration contains 648 atoms in  216 
residues. Is that much time normal, I am running it on my laptop,  which is 2GB 
Ram, and Dual Core ~1.4GHz processor?

Thanks a lot,
Majid





From: Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
To: Gromacs Users' List gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Sun, April 17, 2011 4:39:56 AM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete



majid hasan wrote:
 Okay, so I divided the procedure in three steps, and this does produce output 
immediately. But it seems that it doesn't put second molecule inside the box.
 Here is the what I am doing:
 
 1. editconf -f ssgcg.pdb -o ssgcg.gro -box 20 20 20 2. genbox -cp ssgcg.gro 
 -ci 
cntcapped.pdb -nmol 1 -o cntdna.gro
 3. editconf -f spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro -box 20 20 20
 4. genbox -cp cntdna.gro -cs spc216.gro -o solvated.gro
 5. editconf -f solvated.gro -o solvated.pdb
 
 I tried cubic boxes of different lenghts (10, 20, 100), but when I see the 
final file in solvated.pdb in rasmol, it seems that it puts dna, and cnt at a 
distance equal to the specified length of the box, and the water molecules are 
all clustered around dna only.
 
 I also tried to create a box of lenght 100 20 20 and align dna along 1 0 0, 
 but 
I still got the similar final output.
 
 My question is, what determines the distance between molecules inside the 
 box, 
and how can I make sure that they are placed at a reasonable distance inside 
the 
solvent?
 

I'm not entirely clear on what you're seeing, but you need to omit step 3 
above.  Defining a huge box for a small cube of solvent will lead to incorrect 
solvation.  genbox will read a solvent configuration and create identical 
blocks 
until the unit cell is full.  Defining a larger box in which you place the 
solvent prevents this from working.

Positions of molecules inserted with genbox -ci -nmol are random.  If you want 
to define a specific orientation or position in the box, use editconf 
-center/-translate/-rotate as necessary.

-Justin

 Thanks,
 Majid
 
 
 
 *From:* Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
 *To:* Gromacs Users' List gmx-users@gromacs.org
 *Sent:* Sat, April 16, 2011 6:19:39 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete
 
 
 
 Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
  
  
   majid hasan wrote:
   Dear All,
  
   I am trying to add a single strand dna, and single walled carbon nanotube 
in a box using the genbox command. After typing following command:
  
   genbox -cp cntcapped.pdb -cs spc216.gro -ci ssgcg.gro -nmol 1 -box 2 2 2 
 -o 
cntdna.gro,
  
   I get: Reading solute configuration
  
   Containing 168 atoms in 1 residues
   Initialising van der waals distances...
  
   WARNING: masses and atomic (Van der Waals) radii will be determined
based on residue and atom names. These numbers can deviate
from the correct mass and radius of the atom type.
  
   Reading solvent configuration
   Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situation
   solvent configuration contains 648 atoms in 216 residues
  
  
   and then it takes forever to produce output.
  
   I tried to generate an output with just one molecule in solvent 
(spc216.gro), and I ran into same problem. I suspect something is wrong with 
my 
solvent input (file attached). I copied this file from gromacs/tutor/water 
folder, though it looks reasonable when I view I view the corresponding .pdb 
file in rasmol (I created .gro file from .pdb file using editconf -f 
spc216.pdb 
-o spc216.gro).
  
   Could anyone please guide me about possible issues, and how to resolve 
them?
  
  
   You're asking genbox to do far too many things at once.  Divide your 
procedure into steps:
  
   1. Set a box size using editconf for either the CNT or DNA.
 
 I should say a sensible box size - a 2x2x2 box barely accommodates the 
smallest DNA fragment, and then certainly does not leave any room at all to 
accommodate the minimum image convention.
 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Minimum_Image_Convention
 
 -Justin
 
 -- 
 
 Justin A. Lemkul
 Ph.D. Candidate
 ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
 MILES-IGERT Trainee
 Department

Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-17 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



majid hasan wrote:

Okay, so here is an output attached, for cubic box of length 10.

Actually, the carbon atoms are all placed at   0x4,  0 y 2.5,   
0z3.5. While solvent and DNA atoms are in the region 4x,y,z6. So 


Then your box size is overkill.  All you're going to end up doing is adding tens 
of thousands of waters that do not serve any purpose for most applications. 
There is (in general) no need for a 4-nm buffer around your system.  Take your 
unsolvated coordinate file and run editconf -d 1 to obtain a more suitable box 
before trying genbox again.


only DNA is solvated, while CNT is just lying outside. Though I might 
have placed solvent in a cube of length 10 (using: editconf -f 
spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro -box 10 10 10), could this be the reason?




Yes, as I said before - do not adjust the box of spc216.gro.  The genbox program 
takes the input solvent configuration (unmodified, please!) and tiles it across 
the box defined in the -cp configuration such that it fills the box.  If you 
make a solvent box with a bunch of empty space just to fit in your existing 
box, you accomplish nothing at all and genbox will probably chew up a lot of 
memory trying to make this exact fit.


I am at the moment trying to solvate the whole system (in a cubic box of 
20) without specifying -box in editconf -o spc216.gro, but this is 
taking long, its running for about half an hour  after reaching this 
point: Reading solvent configuration Quotation Solvent configuration 
contains 648 atoms in 216 residues. Is that much time normal, I am 
running it on my laptop, which is 2GB Ram, and Dual Core ~1.4GHz processor?


That is an enormous box that will require a large amount of memory to 
accomplish.  Before trying to get a huge box to work, make sure you can do 
something more normal as I suggest above.  You haven't stated your overall 
purpose, but for only a very few particular tasks would you ever require a 
system this large for components as small as the ones you're dealing with.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-17 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



majid hasan wrote:
Okay, so here is an output attached, for cubic box of length 10 (I 
removed some atoms to reduce the size below 50kB).




Please do not attach coordinate files unless requested.  Most people who are 
uninterested in this thread do not want to waste time downloading large emails 
that they don't need.  It is substantially more efficient to post a link to an 
image in a freely accessible place, i.e. point #4:


http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists#Mailing_List_Etiquette

Also, ad hoc removal of atoms is not helpful to solving your issue.

-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-17 Thread majid hasan
Okay, thank you.

Majid




From: Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
To: Gromacs Users' List gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Sun, April 17, 2011 12:28:47 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete



majid hasan wrote:
 Okay, so here is an output attached, for cubic box of length 10.
 
 Actually, the carbon atoms are all placed at   0x4,  0 y 2.5,   0z3.5. 
While solvent and DNA atoms are in the region 4x,y,z6. So 


Then your box size is overkill.  All you're going to end up doing is adding 
tens 
of thousands of waters that do not serve any purpose for most applications. 
There is (in general) no need for a 4-nm buffer around your system.  Take your 
unsolvated coordinate file and run editconf -d 1 to obtain a more suitable box 
before trying genbox again.

 only DNA is solvated, while CNT is just lying outside. Though I might have 
placed solvent in a cube of length 10 (using: editconf -f spc216.pdb -o 
spc216.gro -box 10 10 10), could this be the reason?
 

Yes, as I said before - do not adjust the box of spc216.gro.  The genbox 
program 
takes the input solvent configuration (unmodified, please!) and tiles it across 
the box defined in the -cp configuration such that it fills the box.  If you 
make a solvent box with a bunch of empty space just to fit in your existing 
box, you accomplish nothing at all and genbox will probably chew up a lot of 
memory trying to make this exact fit.

 I am at the moment trying to solvate the whole system (in a cubic box of 20) 
without specifying -box in editconf -o spc216.gro, but this is taking long, 
its 
running for about half an hour  after reaching this point: Reading solvent 
configuration Quotation Solvent configuration contains 648 atoms in 216 
residues. Is that much time normal, I am running it on my laptop, which is 2GB 
Ram, and Dual Core ~1.4GHz processor?

That is an enormous box that will require a large amount of memory to 
accomplish.  Before trying to get a huge box to work, make sure you can do 
something more normal as I suggest above.  You haven't stated your overall 
purpose, but for only a very few particular tasks would you ever require a 
system this large for components as small as the ones you're dealing with.

-Justin

-- 

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


-- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search 
before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or 
send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-17 Thread majid hasan
Alright, thanks.

Majid




From: Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
To: Gromacs Users' List gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Sun, April 17, 2011 12:31:49 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete



majid hasan wrote:
 Okay, so here is an output attached, for cubic box of length 10 (I removed 
 some 
atoms to reduce the size below 50kB).
 

Please do not attach coordinate files unless requested.  Most people who are 
uninterested in this thread do not want to waste time downloading large emails 
that they don't need.  It is substantially more efficient to post a link to an 
image in a freely accessible place, i.e. point #4:

http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists#Mailing_List_Etiquette

Also, ad hoc removal of atoms is not helpful to solving your issue.

-Justin

-- 

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


-- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search 
before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or 
send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

[gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-16 Thread majid hasan
Dear All,

I am trying to add a single strand dna, and single walled carbon nanotube in a 
box using the genbox command. After typing following command: 


genbox -cp cntcapped.pdb -cs spc216.gro -ci ssgcg.gro -nmol 1 -box 2 2 2 -o 
cntdna.gro, 


I get: Reading solute configuration

Containing 168 atoms in 1 residues
Initialising van der waals distances...

WARNING: masses and atomic (Van der Waals) radii will be determined
 based on residue and atom names. These numbers can deviate
 from the correct mass and radius of the atom type.

Reading solvent configuration
Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situation
solvent configuration contains 648 atoms in 216 residues


and then it takes forever to produce output. 

I tried to generate an output with just one molecule in solvent (spc216.gro), 
and I ran into same problem. I suspect something is wrong with my solvent input 
(file attached). I copied this file from gromacs/tutor/water folder, though it 
looks reasonable when I view I view the corresponding .pdb file in rasmol (I 
created .gro file from .pdb file using editconf -f spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro). 


Could anyone please guide me about possible issues, and how to resolve them? 

Thank You,
Majid

spc216.gro
Description: Binary data
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-16 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



majid hasan wrote:

Dear All,

I am trying to add a single strand dna, and single walled carbon 
nanotube in a box using the genbox command. After typing following command:


genbox -cp cntcapped.pdb -cs spc216.gro -ci ssgcg.gro -nmol 1 -box 2 2 2 
-o cntdna.gro,


I get: Reading solute configuration

Containing 168 atoms in 1 residues
Initialising van der waals distances...

WARNING: masses and atomic (Van der Waals) radii will be determined
 based on residue and atom names. These numbers can deviate
 from the correct mass and radius of the atom type.

Reading solvent configuration
Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situation
solvent configuration contains 648 atoms in 216 residues


and then it takes forever to produce output.

I tried to generate an output with just one molecule in solvent 
(spc216.gro), and I ran into same problem. I suspect something is wrong 
with my solvent input (file attached). I copied this file from 
gromacs/tutor/water folder, though it looks reasonable when I view I 
view the corresponding .pdb file in rasmol (I created .gro file from 
.pdb file using editconf -f spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro).


Could anyone please guide me about possible issues, and how to resolve 
them?




You're asking genbox to do far too many things at once.  Divide your procedure 
into steps:


1. Set a box size using editconf for either the CNT or DNA.
2. Place DNA into box with CNT using genbox -ci -nmol 1 (or vice versa: CNT into 
DNA box, whichever order you want)

3. Solvate

-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-16 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Justin A. Lemkul wrote:



majid hasan wrote:

Dear All,

I am trying to add a single strand dna, and single walled carbon 
nanotube in a box using the genbox command. After typing following 
command:


genbox -cp cntcapped.pdb -cs spc216.gro -ci ssgcg.gro -nmol 1 -box 2 2 
2 -o cntdna.gro,


I get: Reading solute configuration

Containing 168 atoms in 1 residues
Initialising van der waals distances...

WARNING: masses and atomic (Van der Waals) radii will be determined
 based on residue and atom names. These numbers can deviate
 from the correct mass and radius of the atom type.

Reading solvent configuration
Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situation
solvent configuration contains 648 atoms in 216 residues


and then it takes forever to produce output.

I tried to generate an output with just one molecule in solvent 
(spc216.gro), and I ran into same problem. I suspect something is 
wrong with my solvent input (file attached). I copied this file from 
gromacs/tutor/water folder, though it looks reasonable when I view I 
view the corresponding .pdb file in rasmol (I created .gro file from 
.pdb file using editconf -f spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro).


Could anyone please guide me about possible issues, and how to resolve 
them?




You're asking genbox to do far too many things at once.  Divide your 
procedure into steps:


1. Set a box size using editconf for either the CNT or DNA.


I should say a sensible box size - a 2x2x2 box barely accommodates the 
smallest DNA fragment, and then certainly does not leave any room at all to 
accommodate the minimum image convention.


http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Minimum_Image_Convention

-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-16 Thread majid hasan
Okay, thanks Justin!.

Majid




From: Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
To: Gromacs Users' List gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Sat, April 16, 2011 6:19:39 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete



Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
 
 
 majid hasan wrote:
 Dear All,
 
 I am trying to add a single strand dna, and single walled carbon nanotube in 
 a 
box using the genbox command. After typing following command:
 
 genbox -cp cntcapped.pdb -cs spc216.gro -ci ssgcg.gro -nmol 1 -box 2 2 2 -o 
cntdna.gro,
 
 I get: Reading solute configuration
 
 Containing 168 atoms in 1 residues
 Initialising van der waals distances...
 
 WARNING: masses and atomic (Van der Waals) radii will be determined
  based on residue and atom names. These numbers can deviate
  from the correct mass and radius of the atom type.
 
 Reading solvent configuration
 Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situation
 solvent configuration contains 648 atoms in 216 residues
 
 
 and then it takes forever to produce output.
 
 I tried to generate an output with just one molecule in solvent 
 (spc216.gro), 
and I ran into same problem. I suspect something is wrong with my solvent 
input 
(file attached). I copied this file from gromacs/tutor/water folder, though 
it 
looks reasonable when I view I view the corresponding .pdb file in rasmol (I 
created .gro file from .pdb file using editconf -f spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro).
 
 Could anyone please guide me about possible issues, and how to resolve them?
 
 
 You're asking genbox to do far too many things at once.  Divide your 
 procedure 
into steps:
 
 1. Set a box size using editconf for either the CNT or DNA.

I should say a sensible box size - a 2x2x2 box barely accommodates the 
smallest DNA fragment, and then certainly does not leave any room at all to 
accommodate the minimum image convention.

http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Minimum_Image_Convention

-Justin

-- 

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


-- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search 
before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or 
send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete

2011-04-16 Thread majid hasan
Okay, so I divided the procedure in three steps, and this does produce output 
immediately. But it seems that it doesn't put second molecule inside the box.
Here is the what I am doing:

1. editconf -f ssgcg.pdb -o ssgcg.gro -box 20 20 20  
2. genbox -cp ssgcg.gro -ci cntcapped.pdb -nmol 1 -o cntdna.gro
3. editconf -f spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro -box 20 20 20
4. genbox -cp cntdna.gro -cs spc216.gro -o solvated.gro
5. editconf -f solvated.gro -o solvated.pdb

I tried cubic boxes of different lenghts (10, 20, 100), but when I see the 
final 
file in solvated.pdb in rasmol, it seems that it puts dna, and cnt at a 
distance 
equal to the specified length of the box, and the water molecules are all 
clustered around dna only.

I also tried to create a box of lenght 100 20 20 and align dna along 1 0 0, but 
I still got the similar final output. 


My question is, what determines the distance between molecules inside the box, 
and how can I make sure that they are placed at a reasonable distance inside 
the 
solvent?

Thanks,
Majid






From: Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
To: Gromacs Users' List gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Sat, April 16, 2011 6:19:39 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] genbox output taking forever to complete



Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
 
 
 majid hasan wrote:
 Dear All,
 
 I am trying to add a single strand dna, and single walled carbon nanotube in 
 a 
box using the genbox command. After typing following command:
 
 genbox -cp cntcapped.pdb -cs spc216.gro -ci ssgcg.gro -nmol 1 -box 2 2 2 -o 
cntdna.gro,
 
 I get: Reading solute configuration
 
 Containing 168 atoms in 1 residues
 Initialising van der waals distances...
 
 WARNING: masses and atomic (Van der Waals) radii will be determined
  based on residue and atom names. These numbers can deviate
  from the correct mass and radius of the atom type.
 
 Reading solvent configuration
 Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situation
 solvent configuration contains 648 atoms in 216 residues
 
 
 and then it takes forever to produce output.
 
 I tried to generate an output with just one molecule in solvent 
 (spc216.gro), 
and I ran into same problem. I suspect something is wrong with my solvent 
input 
(file attached). I copied this file from gromacs/tutor/water folder, though 
it 
looks reasonable when I view I view the corresponding .pdb file in rasmol (I 
created .gro file from .pdb file using editconf -f spc216.pdb -o spc216.gro).
 
 Could anyone please guide me about possible issues, and how to resolve them?
 
 
 You're asking genbox to do far too many things at once.  Divide your 
 procedure 
into steps:
 
 1. Set a box size using editconf for either the CNT or DNA.

I should say a sensible box size - a 2x2x2 box barely accommodates the 
smallest DNA fragment, and then certainly does not leave any room at all to 
accommodate the minimum image convention.

http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Minimum_Image_Convention

-Justin

-- 

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


-- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search 
before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or 
send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists