R: R: R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report>incompatability issue

2008-05-15 Thread Marco Pasetti
Hamish,

Thanks. I'm working on the new installer, that should automatically
recognize if and what version of GRASS is installed, and, if newer, asks the
user if he wants to upgrade to the newer version.

Marco 

-Messaggio originale-
Da: Hamish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Inviato: giovedì 15 maggio 2008 11.33
A: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org; Michael Barton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: Re: R: R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS:
v.report>incompatability issue

> A the moment, the GRASS release is deteminated by the SVN revision 
> number; it represents binaries built upon different source code 
> distributions.
> I think that I should introduce a new code number, that represents 
> releases with differences in binaries, libraries, install script 
> patches... that is all but not differences in GRASS source code: I 
> could call it BNR (Binary Release Code) and start it with 0 every time 
> the SVN rev number has changed in the binary release.
>  
> What do you think about?

FWIW this is how debian expresses it:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version

not that they should dictate what we do, but fyi. (their "BNR" resets to
"-1" upon new code releases; "-0" is sometimes used for a release candidate
or preparatory packages)

the version before the hyphen is the source code release's domain, after is
the packager's domain.


Hamish



  

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


Re: R: R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report>incompatability issue

2008-05-15 Thread Hamish
> A the moment, the GRASS release is deteminated by the SVN
> revision number; it represents binaries built upon
> different source code distributions.
> I think that I should introduce a new code number, that
> represents releases with differences in binaries,
> libraries, install script patches... that is all but not
> differences in GRASS source code: I could call it BNR
> (Binary Release Code) and start it with 0 every time the
> SVN rev number has changed in the binary release.
>  
> What do you think about?

FWIW this is how debian expresses it:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version

not that they should dictate what we do, but fyi. (their "BNR" resets to "-1" 
upon new code releases; "-0" is sometimes used for a release candidate or 
preparatory packages)

the version before the hyphen is the source code release's domain, after is the 
packager's domain.


Hamish



  

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


R: R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report>incompatability issue

2008-05-15 Thread marco.pasetti
-2 is correct for me, since I already submitted a patch for the installer 
script and updated the 6.3.0 installer some days ago.
Now I need to figure out how to introduce some changes in the GRASS regkey 
layout to let the installer recognize if the current installed GRASS (if 
present) is the latest release or not, and thus decide if update the installed 
copy.
A the moment, the GRASS release is deteminated by the SVN revision number; it 
represents binaries built upon different source code distributions.
I think that I should introduce a new code number, that represents releases 
with differences in binaries, libraries, install script patches... that is all 
but not differences in GRASS source code: I could call it BNR (Binary Release 
Code) and start it with 0 every time the SVN rev number has changed in the 
binary release.
 
What do you think about?
 
Marco


Da: Hamish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: gio 15/05/2008 4.33
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org; Michael Barton
Oggetto: Re: R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: 
v.report>incompatability issue



Marco:
> > Yes. The new installer is already in my GRASS folder.
> > Just tell me if upload it or not (and with what name,
> > 6.3.0-1?)

or -2.

> I don't think you need to version your installer. GRASS
> is the same version
> that it was previously, you have just updated the GRASS
> installer. So I'd
> just put a date on it so that people know it's newer
> than the old installer.
> In fact, I would not change the version because that
> implies a different version of GRASS.

the typical (linux) convention is to label by source code version then "-" 
package revision. so 6.3.0-2 would seem appropriate here. For source code 
changes and extra "." is used, like "6.3.0.1". I would hesitate to put the date 
in there unless it is a SVN snapshot or the line of package revisions is 
someway broken. If date is used, please use a sortable way like MMDD.


Hamish




 



___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report>incompatability issue

2008-05-14 Thread Hamish
Marco:
> > Yes. The new installer is already in my GRASS folder.
> > Just tell me if upload it or not (and with what name,
> > 6.3.0-1?)

or -2.

> I don't think you need to version your installer. GRASS
> is the same version
> that it was previously, you have just updated the GRASS
> installer. So I'd
> just put a date on it so that people know it's newer
> than the old installer.
> In fact, I would not change the version because that
> implies a different version of GRASS.

the typical (linux) convention is to label by source code version then "-" 
package revision. so 6.3.0-2 would seem appropriate here. For source code 
changes and extra "." is used, like "6.3.0.1". I would hesitate to put the date 
in there unless it is a SVN snapshot or the line of package revisions is 
someway broken. If date is used, please use a sortable way like MMDD.


Hamish




  

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


Re: R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report>incompatability issue

2008-05-14 Thread Michael Barton
Great. 

I don't think you need to version your installer. GRASS is the same version
that it was previously, you have just updated the GRASS installer. So I'd
just put a date on it so that people know it's newer than the old installer.
In fact, I would not change the version because that implies a different
version of GRASS.

Michael


On 5/14/08 1:56 PM, "Marco Pasetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Michael,
> 
> Yes. The new installer is already in my GRASS folder.
> Just tell me if upload it or not (and with what name, 6.3.0-1?)
> 
> Marco
> 
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Michael Barton
> Inviato: martedì 13 maggio 2008 18.40
> A: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Oggetto: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS:
> v.report>incompatability issue
> 
> Thanks very much Marco.
> 
> Also, I don't think there is any reason that binaries (and especially needed
> dependencies like coreutils) cannot be updated between GRASS version
> releases.
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> On 5/13/08 9:00 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:00:16 -
>> From: "GRASS GIS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report
>> incompatability issue
>> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> 
>> #160: WinGRASS: v.report  incompatability issue
>> -+
>> -+--
>>   Reporter:  isaacullah  |   Owner:  grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
>>   Type:  defect  |  Status:  closed
>>   Priority:  major   |   Milestone:  6.4.0
>>  Component:  default | Version:  6.3.0
>> Resolution:  fixed   |Keywords:  v.report paste WinGRASS
>> -+
>> -+--
>> Changes (by 4everskiff):
>> 
>>   * status:  new => closed
>>   * resolution:  => fixed
>> 
>> Comment:
>> 
>>  I already did the job on my local machine. All the MSYS coreutils
>> will be  added to the next WinGRASS release.
>> 
>>  This done, I checked the v.report module using the North-Carolina
>> sample
>>  database: it worked fine for me.
>> 
>>  Until the next release will be published, do as follows:
>> 
>>  Download the coreutils package from here:
>>  http://downloads.sourceforge.net/mingw/coreutils-5.97-MSYS-1.0.11-
>>  snapshot.tar.bz2
>> 
>>  Unpack it to a temporary folder, then copy all the content of the
>>  coreutils-5.97 folder to %your GRASS installation path%\msys
>> 
>>  Marco
> 
> __
> Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology Director of Graduate Studies
> School of Human Evolution & Social Change Center for Social Dynamics and
> Complexity Arizona State University
> 
> phone: 480-965-6213
> fax: 480-965-7671
> www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton
> 
> ___
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
> 

__
Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
Director of Graduate Studies
School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Arizona State University

phone: 480-965-6213
fax: 480-965-7671
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton


___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report>incompatability issue

2008-05-14 Thread Marco Pasetti
Michael,

Yes. The new installer is already in my GRASS folder.
Just tell me if upload it or not (and with what name, 6.3.0-1?)

Marco

-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Michael Barton
Inviato: martedì 13 maggio 2008 18.40
A: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Oggetto: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS:
v.report>incompatability issue

Thanks very much Marco.

Also, I don't think there is any reason that binaries (and especially needed
dependencies like coreutils) cannot be updated between GRASS version
releases.

Michael


On 5/13/08 9:00 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:00:16 -
> From: "GRASS GIS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report 
> incompatability issue
> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> #160: WinGRASS: v.report  incompatability issue
> -+
> -+--
>   Reporter:  isaacullah  |   Owner:  grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
>   Type:  defect  |  Status:  closed
>   Priority:  major   |   Milestone:  6.4.0
>  Component:  default | Version:  6.3.0
> Resolution:  fixed   |Keywords:  v.report paste WinGRASS
> -+
> -+--
> Changes (by 4everskiff):
> 
>   * status:  new => closed
>   * resolution:  => fixed
> 
> Comment:
> 
>  I already did the job on my local machine. All the MSYS coreutils 
> will be  added to the next WinGRASS release.
> 
>  This done, I checked the v.report module using the North-Carolina 
> sample
>  database: it worked fine for me.
> 
>  Until the next release will be published, do as follows:
> 
>  Download the coreutils package from here:
>  http://downloads.sourceforge.net/mingw/coreutils-5.97-MSYS-1.0.11-
>  snapshot.tar.bz2
> 
>  Unpack it to a temporary folder, then copy all the content of the
>  coreutils-5.97 folder to %your GRASS installation path%\msys
> 
>  Marco

__
Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology Director of Graduate Studies
School of Human Evolution & Social Change Center for Social Dynamics and
Complexity Arizona State University

phone: 480-965-6213
fax: 480-965-7671
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton 

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report> incompatability issue

2008-05-13 Thread Michael Barton
Thanks very much Marco.

Also, I don't think there is any reason that binaries (and especially needed
dependencies like coreutils) cannot be updated between GRASS version
releases.

Michael


On 5/13/08 9:00 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:00:16 -
> From: "GRASS GIS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report
> incompatability issue
> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> #160: WinGRASS: v.report  incompatability issue
> -+--
>   Reporter:  isaacullah  |   Owner:  grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
>   Type:  defect  |  Status:  closed
>   Priority:  major   |   Milestone:  6.4.0
>  Component:  default | Version:  6.3.0
> Resolution:  fixed   |Keywords:  v.report paste WinGRASS
> -+--
> Changes (by 4everskiff):
> 
>   * status:  new => closed
>   * resolution:  => fixed
> 
> Comment:
> 
>  I already did the job on my local machine. All the MSYS coreutils will be
>  added to the next WinGRASS release.
> 
>  This done, I checked the v.report module using the North-Carolina sample
>  database: it worked fine for me.
> 
>  Until the next release will be published, do as follows:
> 
>  Download the coreutils package from here:
>  http://downloads.sourceforge.net/mingw/coreutils-5.97-MSYS-1.0.11-
>  snapshot.tar.bz2
> 
>  Unpack it to a temporary folder, then copy all the content of the
>  coreutils-5.97 folder to %your GRASS installation path%\msys
> 
>  Marco

__
Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
Director of Graduate Studies
School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Center for Social Dynamics and Complexity
Arizona State University

phone: 480-965-6213
fax: 480-965-7671
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton 

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report incompatability issue

2008-05-12 Thread GRASS GIS
#160: WinGRASS: v.report  incompatability issue
-+--
  Reporter:  isaacullah  |   Owner:  grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
  Type:  defect  |  Status:  closed   
  Priority:  major   |   Milestone:  6.4.0
 Component:  default | Version:  6.3.0
Resolution:  fixed   |Keywords:  v.report paste WinGRASS  
-+--
Changes (by 4everskiff):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => fixed

Comment:

 I already did the job on my local machine. All the MSYS coreutils will be
 added to the next WinGRASS release.

 This done, I checked the v.report module using the North-Carolina sample
 database: it worked fine for me.

 Until the next release will be published, do as follows:

 Download the coreutils package from here:
 http://downloads.sourceforge.net/mingw/coreutils-5.97-MSYS-1.0.11-
 snapshot.tar.bz2

 Unpack it to a temporary folder, then copy all the content of the
 coreutils-5.97 folder to %your GRASS installation path%\msys

 Marco

-- 
Ticket URL: 
GRASS GIS 
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report incompatability issue

2008-05-12 Thread GRASS GIS
#160: WinGRASS: v.report  incompatability issue
-+--
  Reporter:  isaacullah  |   Owner:  grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
  Type:  defect  |  Status:  new  
  Priority:  major   |   Milestone:  6.4.0
 Component:  default | Version:  6.3.0
Resolution:  |Keywords:  v.report paste WinGRASS  
-+--
Comment (by 4everskiff):

 Replying to [comment:2 4everskiff]:
 > Replying to [comment:1 mlennert]:
 > > paste is part of coreutils which is available for msys, and which
 should IMHO be installed since it contains elementary programs such as
 cat, cut, paste, rm, cp, etc, which I wouldn't be surprised to find in
 other scripts.
 > >
 > > Until this is done, the coreutils package for MSYS 1.0.11 can be
 obtained here:
 > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2435
 > >
 > > Moritz
 >
 > MSYS is already installed by default in WinGRASS.
 >
 > Marco

 It would be good to collect some usefull utils not contained in the
 standard MSYS release (such as paste) to be included in the next WinGRASS
 releases.

 Marco

-- 
Ticket URL: 
GRASS GIS 
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #160: WinGRASS: v.report incompatability issue

2008-05-12 Thread GRASS GIS
#160: WinGRASS: v.report  incompatability issue
-+--
  Reporter:  isaacullah  |   Owner:  grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
  Type:  defect  |  Status:  new  
  Priority:  major   |   Milestone:  6.4.0
 Component:  default | Version:  6.3.0
Resolution:  |Keywords:  v.report paste WinGRASS  
-+--
Changes (by 4everskiff):

  * summary:  v.report WinGRASS incompatability issue => WinGRASS: v.report
  incompatability issue

Comment:

 Replying to [comment:1 mlennert]:
 > paste is part of coreutils which is available for msys, and which should
 IMHO be installed since it contains elementary programs such as cat, cut,
 paste, rm, cp, etc, which I wouldn't be surprised to find in other
 scripts.
 >
 > Until this is done, the coreutils package for MSYS 1.0.11 can be
 obtained here:
 > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2435
 >
 > Moritz

 MSYS is already installed by default in WinGRASS.

 Marco

-- 
Ticket URL: 
GRASS GIS 
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev