[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15386887#comment-15386887 ] John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 7/21/16 5:41 AM: --- Thanks [~eddyxu] for the review! Great comments. I will fix the issues.. bq. Is it true that after creation, the createMode is not useful for INode, as its mode has already been established? I feel that we do not need to store it as a feature in INode. Yes it is true, create modes are only needed during inode creation. It is a stretch to call CreateModes a feature, but it has be stored somewhere in inode or another data structure 1-1 tied to inode. Suggestions are welcome. was (Author: jzhuge): Thanks [~eddyxu] for the review! Great comments. I will fix the issues.. bq. Is it true that after creation, the createMode is not useful for INode, as its mode has already been established? I feel that we do not need to store it as a feature in INode. Yes it is true, create modes are only needed during inode creation. It is a stretch to call CreateModes a feature, but it has be stored somewhere in something hanging off inode or another data structure 1-1 tied to inode. Suggestions are welcome. > ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode > > > Key: HDFS-6962 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security >Affects Versions: 2.4.1 > Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final) >Reporter: LINTE >Assignee: John Zhuge >Priority: Critical > Labels: hadoop, security > Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch, > HDFS-6962.003.patch, HDFS-6962.004.patch, HDFS-6962.005.patch, > HDFS-6962.006.patch, HDFS-6962.007.patch, HDFS-6962.1.patch, > disabled_new_client.log, disabled_old_client.log, enabled_new_client.log, > enabled_old_client.log, run > > > In hdfs-site.xml > > dfs.umaskmode > 027 > > 1/ Create a directory as superuser > bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS > 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user > toto > bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS > bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS > 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/ > bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/ > # file: /tmp/ACLS > # owner: hdfs > # group: hadoop > user::rwx > group::r-x > other::--- > default:user::rwx > default:user:toto:rwx > default:group::r-x > default:group:readwrite:rwx > default:mask::rwx > default:other::--- > user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in > hdfs-site.xml, everything ok ! > default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for > inhéritance. > default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance. > default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask > 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL > bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs > 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs > bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs > # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs > # owner: hdfs > # group: hadoop > user::rwx > user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x > group::r-x > group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x > mask::r-x > other::--- > default:user::rwx > default:user:toto:rwx > default:group::r-x > default:group:readwrite:rwx > default:mask::rwx > default:other::--- > Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective > because the mask is r-x (mask::r-x) in spite of default mask for inheritance > is set to default:mask::rwx on /tmp/ACLS/ > 6/ Modifiy hdfs-site.xml et restart namenode > > dfs.umaskmode > 010 > > 7/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL with new parameter umaskmode > bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2 > 8/ Check ACL on /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2 > bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2 > # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2 > # owner: hdfs > # group: hadoop > user::rwx > user:toto:rwx #effective:rw- > group::r-x #effective:r-- > group:readwrite:rwx #effective:rw- > mask::rw- > other::--- > default:user::rwx > default:user:toto:rwx > default:group::r-x > default:group:readwrite:rwx > default:mask::rwx > default:other::--- > So HDFS masks the ACL value (user, group and other -- exepted the POSIX > owner -- ) with the group mask of dfs.umaskmode properties when creating > directory with inherited ACL. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15386399#comment-15386399
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 7/20/16 10:40 PM:
[~cnauroth] and [~eddyxu] Please review patch 007.
Diff from 006:
* Add CLI tests {{TestAclCLIWithPosixAclInheritance}} based on {{TestAclCLI}}
* No longer add field {{createModes}} to {{INodeWithAdditionalFields}}.
Instead, add new feature {{CreateModesFeature}} to store create modes. In this
way, no penalty when POSIX ACL inheritance is disable or for any inode not
being created.
* Remove the feature {{CreateModesFeature}} once default ACL has been
processed, so the feature only exists in inode for a short period of time.
* There is cost of adding and removing the new feature.
TODO:
* Support webhdfs
was (Author: jzhuge):
[~cnauroth] and [~eddyxu] Please review patch 007.
Diff from 006:
* Add CLI tests {{TestAclCLIWithPosixAclInheritance}} based on {{TestAclCLI}}
* No longer add field {{createModes}} to {{INodeWithAdditionalFields}}.
Instead, add new feature {{CreateModesFeature}} to store create modes. In this
way, no penalty when POSIX ACL inheritance is disable or for any inode not
associated with a create request.
* Remove the feature {{CreateModesFeature}} once default ACL has been processed.
* There is added cost of adding and removing the new feature.
TODO:
* Support webhdfs
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.003.patch, HDFS-6962.004.patch, HDFS-6962.005.patch,
> HDFS-6962.006.patch, HDFS-6962.007.patch, HDFS-6962.1.patch,
> disabled_new_client.log, disabled_old_client.log, enabled_new_client.log,
> enabled_old_client.log, run
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance.
> default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask
> 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x
> group::r-x
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective
> because the mask is r-x (mask::r-x) in spite of default mask for inheritance
> is set to default:mask::rwx on /tmp/ACLS/
> 6/ Modifiy hdfs-site.xml et restart namenode
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 010
>
> 7/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL with new parameter umaskmode
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> 8/ Check ACL on /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:rw-
> group::r-x #effective:r--
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:rw-
> mask::rw-
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> So HDFS masks the ACL value (user, group and other -- exepted the POSIX
> owner -- ) with the group mask of dfs.umaskmode properties when creating
> directory with inherited ACL.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: h
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15359304#comment-15359304
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 7/4/16 8:02 AM:
--
Saw {{TestDataNodeLifeline}} and {{TestOfflineEditsViewer}} failures on my
local Mac with stock trunk, so they are not regressions.
{{TestMover,TestNNThroughputBenchmark,TestNNThroughputBenchmark,TestStripedINodeFile,TestRetryCacheWithHA}}
failures are regressions.
was (Author: jzhuge):
Looking into the unit test failures. They are regressions.
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.003.patch, HDFS-6962.004.patch, HDFS-6962.1.patch,
> disabled_new_client.log, disabled_old_client.log, enabled_new_client.log,
> enabled_old_client.log, run
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance.
> default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask
> 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x
> group::r-x
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective
> because the mask is r-x (mask::r-x) in spite of default mask for inheritance
> is set to default:mask::rwx on /tmp/ACLS/
> 6/ Modifiy hdfs-site.xml et restart namenode
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 010
>
> 7/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL with new parameter umaskmode
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> 8/ Check ACL on /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:rw-
> group::r-x #effective:r--
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:rw-
> mask::rw-
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> So HDFS masks the ACL value (user, group and other -- exepted the POSIX
> owner -- ) with the group mask of dfs.umaskmode properties when creating
> directory with inherited ACL.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15354400#comment-15354400
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/29/16 2:56 AM:
---
Patch 004 passed system and compatibility tests on a pseudo cluster. Upload
test logs. Focus on group WRITE permission. The test script is {{run}}, the
command line is
{code}
test_tag=disabled_new_client ; script ~/test/$test_tag.log ~/test/run $test_tag
{code}
Test server is running {{3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004}} with POSIX ACL Inheritance
either enabled or disabled. There are 2 versions of test clients. The POSIX ACL
inheritance is only in effect when the flag is true and the requests come from
a compatible client. The following table shows the matrix for the log files.
|| Client Version\POSIX ACL Inheritance || Enabled || Disabled ||
| 2.6.0 | enabled_old_client.log | disabled_old_client.log |
| 3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004 | enabled_new_client.log | disabled_new_client.log |
In each log file, there is a test matrix of the following dimensions:
* Parent dir has default ACL or not
* Umask 002 or 027
* Create a file (create request) or a sub-directory (mkdirs request)
was (Author: jzhuge):
Patch 004 passed system and compatibility tests on a pseudo cluster. Upload
test logs. Focus on group permission, especially WRITE. The test script is
{{run}}, the command line is
{code}
test_tag=disabled_new_client ; script ~/test/$test_tag.log ~/test/run $test_tag
{code}
Test server is running {{3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004}} with POSIX ACL Inheritance
either enabled or disabled. There are 2 versions of test clients. The POSIX ACL
inheritance is only in effect when the flag is true and the requests come from
a compatible client. The following table shows the matrix for the log files.
|| Client Version\POSIX ACL Inheritance || Enabled || Disabled ||
| 2.6.0 | enabled_old_client.log | disabled_old_client.log |
| 3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004 | enabled_new_client.log | disabled_new_client.log |
In each log file, there is a test matrix of the following dimensions:
* Parent dir has default ACL or not
* Umask 002 or 027
* Create a file (create request) or a sub-directory (mkdirs request)
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.003.patch, HDFS-6962.1.patch, disabled_new_client.log,
> disabled_old_client.log, enabled_new_client.log, enabled_old_client.log, run
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance.
> default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask
> 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x
> group::r-x
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective
> because the mask is r-x (mask::r-x) in spite of default mask for inheritance
> is set to default:mask::rwx on /tmp/ACLS/
> 6/ Modifiy hdfs-site.xml et restart namenode
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 010
>
> 7/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL with new parameter umaskmode
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> 8/ Check ACL on /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: ha
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15354400#comment-15354400
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/29/16 2:48 AM:
---
Patch 004 passed system and compatibility tests on a pseudo cluster. Upload
test logs. Focus on group permission, especially WRITE. The test script is
{{run}}, the command line is
{code}
test_tag=disabled_new_client ; script ~/test/$test_tag.log ~/test/run $test_tag
{code}
Test server is running {{3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004}} with POSIX ACL Inheritance
either enabled or disabled. There are 2 versions of test clients. The POSIX ACL
inheritance is only in effect when the flag is true and the requests come from
a compatible client. The following table shows the matrix for the log files.
|| Client Version\POSIX ACL Inheritance || Enabled || Disabled ||
| 2.6.0 | enabled_old_client.log | disabled_old_client.log |
| 3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004 | enabled_new_client.log | disabled_new_client.log |
In each log file, there is a test matrix of the following dimensions:
* Parent dir has default ACL or not
* Umask 002 or 027
* Create a file (create request) or a sub-directory (mkdirs request)
was (Author: jzhuge):
Pass system and compatibility tests with Patch 004 on a pseudo cluster. Upload
test logs. Focus on group permission, especially WRITE. The test script is
{{run}}, the command line is
{code}
test_tag=disabled_new_client ; script ~/test/$test_tag.log ~/test/run $test_tag
{code}
Test server is running {{3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004}} with POSIX ACL Inheritance
either enabled or disabled. There are 2 versions of test clients. The POSIX ACL
inheritance is only in effect when the flag is true and the requests come from
a compatible client. The following table shows the matrix for the log files.
|| Client Version\POSIX ACL Inheritance || Enabled || Disabled ||
| 2.6.0 | enabled_old_client.log | disabled_old_client.log |
| 3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004 | enabled_new_client.log | disabled_new_client.log |
In each log file, there is a test matrix of the following dimensions:
* Parent dir has default ACL or not
* Umask 002 or 027
* Create a file (create request) or a sub-directory (mkdirs request)
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.003.patch, HDFS-6962.1.patch, disabled_new_client.log,
> disabled_old_client.log, enabled_new_client.log, enabled_old_client.log, run
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance.
> default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask
> 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x
> group::r-x
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective
> because the mask is r-x (mask::r-x) in spite of default mask for inheritance
> is set to default:mask::rwx on /tmp/ACLS/
> 6/ Modifiy hdfs-site.xml et restart namenode
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 010
>
> 7/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL with new parameter umaskmode
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> 8/ Check ACL on /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # owner: hdf
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15354400#comment-15354400
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/29/16 2:40 AM:
---
Pass system and compatibility tests with Patch 004 on a pseudo cluster. Upload
test logs. Focus on group permission, especially WRITE. The test script is
{{run}}, the command line is
{code}
test_tag=disabled_new_client ; script ~/test/$test_tag.log ~/test/run $test_tag
{code}
Test server is running {{3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004}} with POSIX ACL Inheritance
either enabled or disabled. There are 2 versions of test clients. The POSIX ACL
inheritance is only in effect when the flag is true and the requests come from
a compatible client. The following table shows the matrix for the log files.
|| Client Version\POSIX ACL Inheritance || Enabled || Disabled ||
| 2.6.0 | enabled_old_client.log | disabled_old_client.log |
| 3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004 | enabled_new_client.log | disabled_new_client.log |
In each log file, there is a test matrix of the following dimensions:
* Parent dir has default ACL or not
* Umask 002 or 027
* Create a file (create request) or a sub-directory (mkdirs request)
was (Author: jzhuge):
Upload system and compatibility test logs for Patch 004 on a pseudo cluster.
Pay attention to group permission, especially WRITE bit. The test script is
{{run}}, the command line is
{code}
test_tag=disabled_new_client ; script ~/test/$test_tag.log ~/test/run $test_tag
{code}
Test server is running {{3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004}} with POSIX ACL Inheritance
either enabled or disabled. There are 2 versions of test clients. The POSIX ACL
inheritance is only in effect when the flag is true and the requests come from
a compatible client. The following table shows the matrix for the log files.
|| Client Version\POSIX ACL Inheritance || Enabled || Disabled ||
| 2.6.0 | enabled_old_client.log | disabled_old_client.log |
| 3.0.0-alpha1 + Patch 004 | enabled_new_client.log | disabled_new_client.log |
In each log file, there is a test matrix of the following dimensions:
* Parent dir has default ACL or not
* Umask 002 or 027
* Create a file (create request) or a sub-directory (mkdirs request)
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.003.patch, HDFS-6962.1.patch, disabled_new_client.log,
> disabled_old_client.log, enabled_new_client.log, enabled_old_client.log, run
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance.
> default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask
> 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x
> group::r-x
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective
> because the mask is r-x (mask::r-x) in spite of default mask for inheritance
> is set to default:mask::rwx on /tmp/ACLS/
> 6/ Modifiy hdfs-site.xml et restart namenode
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 010
>
> 7/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL with new parameter umaskmode
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> 8/ Check ACL on /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # owner: h
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15345214#comment-15345214
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/24/16 5:20 AM:
---
[~cnauroth] Are there automated tests for section {{Default Acls}} in test plan
{{Test-Plan-for-Extended-Acls-2.pdf}}? Either extend that section or add a new
section in test plan to cover ACL inheritance. Currently these are ACL related
tests:
TestAcl,TestAclCommands,TestAclCLI,TestViewFileSystemWithAcls,TestViewFsWithAcls,TestAclWithSnapshot,TestAclConfigFlag,TestAclTransformation,TestFileContextAcl,TestFSImageWithAcl,TestNameNodeAcl,TestAclsEndToEnd,TestOfflineImageViewerForAcl,TestWebHDFSAcl.
Will add a new test class {{namenode/TestAclInheritance}}.
was (Author: jzhuge):
[~cnauroth] Are there automated tests for section {{Default Acls}} in test plan
{{Test-Plan-for-Extended-Acls-2.pdf}}? Either extend that section or add a new
section in test plan to cover ACL inheritance. Currently these are ACL related
tests:
TestAcl,TestAclCommands,TestAclCLI,TestViewFileSystemWithAcls,TestViewFsWithAcls,FSAclBaseTest,TestAclWithSnapshot,TestAclConfigFlag,TestAclTransformation,TestFileContextAcl,TestFSImageWithAcl,TestNameNodeAcl,TestAclsEndToEnd,TestOfflineImageViewerForAcl,TestWebHDFSAcl.
Will add a new test class {{namenode/TestAclInheritance}}.
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.1.patch
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance.
> default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask
> 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x
> group::r-x
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective
> because the mask is r-x (mask::r-x) in spite of default mask for inheritance
> is set to default:mask::rwx on /tmp/ACLS/
> 6/ Modifiy hdfs-site.xml et restart namenode
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 010
>
> 7/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL with new parameter umaskmode
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> 8/ Check ACL on /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:rw-
> group::r-x #effective:r--
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:rw-
> mask::rw-
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> So HDFS masks the ACL value (user, group and other -- exepted the POSIX
> owner -- ) with the group mask of dfs.umaskmode properties when creating
> directory with inherited ACL.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15345214#comment-15345214
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/22/16 9:44 PM:
---
[~cnauroth] Are there automated tests for section {{Default Acls}} in test plan
{{Test-Plan-for-Extended-Acls-2.pdf}}? Either extend that section or add a new
section in test plan to cover ACL inheritance. Currently these are ACL related
tests:
TestAcl,TestAclCommands,TestAclCLI,TestViewFileSystemWithAcls,TestViewFsWithAcls,FSAclBaseTest,TestAclWithSnapshot,TestAclConfigFlag,TestAclTransformation,TestFileContextAcl,TestFSImageWithAcl,TestNameNodeAcl,TestAclsEndToEnd,TestOfflineImageViewerForAcl,TestWebHDFSAcl.
Will add a new test class {{namenode/TestAclInheritance}}.
was (Author: jzhuge):
[~cnauroth] Are there automated tests for section {{Default Acls}} in test plan
{{Test-Plan-for-Extended-Acls-2.pdf}}? Either extend that section or add a new
section in test plan to cover ACL inheritance. Will add a new test class
{{namenode/TestAclInheritance}}.
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.1.patch
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance.
> default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask
> 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x
> group::r-x
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective
> because the mask is r-x (mask::r-x) in spite of default mask for inheritance
> is set to default:mask::rwx on /tmp/ACLS/
> 6/ Modifiy hdfs-site.xml et restart namenode
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 010
>
> 7/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL with new parameter umaskmode
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> 8/ Check ACL on /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:rw-
> group::r-x #effective:r--
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:rw-
> mask::rw-
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> So HDFS masks the ACL value (user, group and other -- exepted the POSIX
> owner -- ) with the group mask of dfs.umaskmode properties when creating
> directory with inherited ACL.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15323941#comment-15323941
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/11/16 6:41 AM:
---
Patch 002 (prototype):
* Create a new class {{FsPermissionDuo}} that extends {{FsPermission}} to store
both masked and unmasked permissions. HDFS client uses it to sneak unmasked
permission from FileContext/FileSystem -> AFS -> Hdfs -> DFSClient -> RPC. NN
uses it to sneak unmasked permission from RPC -> NameNodeRpcServer.create
(placed into PermissionStatus) -> FSNamesystem.startFile ->
FSDirWriterFileOp.startFile/addFile -> INodeFile -> INodeWithAdditionalFields.
* Add field {{unmasked}} to protobuf message {{CreateRequestProto}} and
{{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Modify {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}} to switch between old and new ACL inheritance
behavior.
Questions:
* How to query NN config in {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}}?
* Anyway to avoid adding field FsPermissionDuo to {{INodeWithAdditionalFields}}?
* {{PermissionStatus#applyUMask}} never used, remove it?
* {{DFSClient#mkdirs}} and DFSClient#primitiveMkdir}} use file default if
permission is null. Should use dir default permission?
TODO:
* Investigate the use of permissions in FSDirMkdirOp.createAncestorDirectories
call tree
* Add and run unit tests
* Run system compatibility tests
* Update {{HdfsPermissionsGuide.md}}
[~cnauroth] Could you please take a look at Patch 002 to check whether
backwards compatibility can be achieved with an NN flag and the changes are
going in the right direction? Thanks.
was (Author: jzhuge):
Patch 002 (prototype):
* Create a new class {{FsPermissionDuo}} that extends {{FsPermission}} to store
both masked and unmasked permissions. HDFS client uses it to sneak unmasked
permission from FileContext/FileSystem -> AFS -> Hdfs -> DFSClient -> RPC. NN
uses it to sneak unmasked permission from RPC -> NameNodeRpcServer.create
(placed into PermissionStatus) -> FSNamesystem.startFile ->
FSDirWriterFileOp.startFile/addFile -> INodeFile -> INodeWithAdditionalFields.
* Add field {{unmasked}} to protobuf message {{CreateRequestProto}} and
{{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Modify {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}} to switch between old and new ACL inheritance
behavior.
Questions:
* How to query NN config in {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}}?
* Anyway to avoid adding field FsPermissionDuo to {{INodeWithAdditionalFields}}?
* {{PermissionStatus#applyUMask}} never used, remove it?
* {{DFSClient#mkdirs}} and DFSClient#primitiveMkdir}} use file default if
permission is null. Should use dir default permission?
TODO:
* Investigate the use of permissions in FSDirMkdirOp.createAncestorDirectories
call tree
* Add and run unit tests
* Run system compatibility tests
* Update {{HdfsPermissionsGuide.md}}
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.1.patch
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance.
> default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask
> 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x
> group::r-x
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15323941#comment-15323941
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/11/16 6:39 AM:
---
Patch 002 (prototype):
* Create a new class {{FsPermissionDuo}} that extends {{FsPermission}} to store
both masked and unmasked permissions. HDFS client uses it to sneak unmasked
permission from FileContext/FileSystem -> AFS -> Hdfs -> DFSClient -> RPC. NN
uses it to sneak unmasked permission from RPC -> NameNodeRpcServer.create
(placed into PermissionStatus) -> FSNamesystem.startFile ->
FSDirWriterFileOp.startFile/addFile -> INodeFile -> INodeWithAdditionalFields.
* Add field {{unmasked}} to protobuf message {{CreateRequestProto}} and
{{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Modify {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}} to switch between old and new ACL inheritance
behavior.
Questions:
* How to query NN config in {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}}?
* Anyway to avoid adding field FsPermissionDuo to {{INodeWithAdditionalFields}}?
* {{PermissionStatus#applyUMask}} never used, remove it?
* {{DFSClient#mkdirs}} and DFSClient#primitiveMkdir}} use file default if
permission is null. Should use dir default permission?
TODO:
* Investigate the use of permissions in FSDirMkdirOp.createAncestorDirectories
call tree
* Add and run unit tests
* Run system compatibility tests
* Update {{HdfsPermissionsGuide.md}}
was (Author: jzhuge):
Patch 002 (prototype):
* Create a new class {{FsPermissionDuo}} that extends {{FsPermission}} to store
both masked and unmasked permissions. HDFS client uses it to sneak unmasked
permission from FileContext/FileSystem -> AFS -> Hdfs -> DFSClient -> RPC. NN
uses it to sneak unmasked permission from RPC -> NameNodeRpcServer.create
(placed into PermissionStatus) -> FSNamesystem.startFile ->
FSDirWriterFileOp.startFile/addFile -> INodeFile -> INodeWithAdditionalFields.
* Add field {{unmasked}} to protobuf message {{CreateRequestProto}} and
{{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Modify {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}} to switch between old and new ACL inheritance
behavior.
Questions:
* How to query NN config in {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}}?
* Anyway to avoid adding field FsPermissionDuo to {{INodeWithAdditionalFields}}?
* {{PermissionStatus#applyUMask}} never used, remove it?
* {{DFSClient#mkdirs}} and DFSClient#primitiveMkdir}} use file default if
permission is null. Should use dir default permission?
TODO:
* Investigate the use of permissions in FSDirMkdirOp.createAncestorDirectories
call tree
* Add and run unit tests
* Run system compatibility tests
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.1.patch
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance.
> default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask
> 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x
> group::r-x
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective
> because the mask is r-x (mask::r-x) in spite of default mask for inheritance
> is set to default:mask::rwx on /tmp/ACLS/
> 6/ Modifiy hdfs-site.xml et restart namenode
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 010
>
> 7/ Create a s
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15314624#comment-15314624
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/11/16 6:37 AM:
---
Hi [~cnauroth],
In order to maintain backwards compatibility in Hadoop 2.x, could we add a new
NameNode flag {{dfs.namenode.posix.acl.inheritance.enabled}}, default false in
Hadoop 2.x, default true in Hadoop 3?
Changes to message {{CreateRequestProto}} and {{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Add optional field {{FsPermissionProto unmasked}} to store unmasked mode
parameter
* Preserve the existing meaning of field {{FsPermissionProto masked}}: mode +
umask.
* Please note this approach is slightly different from what you suggested
above. I am ok either way but find this a little less possibility for
misunderstanding.
Wrap around {{AclStorage#copyINodeDefaultAcl}}:
{code:java}
// TODO: How to query NameNode config?
boolean isPosixAclInheritanceEnabled = true;
FsPermission masked = child.getMaskedPermission();
FsPermission unmasked = child.getUnmaskedPermission();
if (isPosixAclInheritanceEnabled && unmasked != null) {
//
// HDFS-6962: POSIX ACL inheritance
//
// Set permission to unmasked
child.setPermission(unmasked);
if (!copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child)) {
// No default ACL in parent dir
// Set permission to masked
child.setPermission(masked);
}
} else {
//
// Old behavior before HDFS-6962
//
assert child.getFsPermission().equals(masked);
copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child);
}
{code}
Here {{INode#getUnmaskedPermission}} returns the unmasked mode sent by
DFSClient; {{INode#getMaskedPermission}} returns the masked mode.
was (Author: jzhuge):
Hi [~cnauroth],
In order to maintain backwards compatibility in Hadoop 2.x, could we add a new
NameNode flag {{dfs.namenode.posix.acl.inheritance.enabled}}, default false in
Hadoop 2.x, default true in Hadoop 3?
Changes to message {{CreateRequestProto}} and {{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Add optional field {{FsPermissionProto unmasked}} to store unmasked mode
parameter
* Preserve the existing meaning of field {{FsPermissionProto masked}}: mode +
umask.
* Please note this approach is slightly different from what you suggested
above. I am ok either way but find this a little less possibility for
misunderstanding.
Wrap around {{AclStorage#copyINodeDefaultAcl}}:
{code:java}
if (child.isPosixAclInheritanceEnabled() == true) {
//
// HDFS-6962. POSIX ACL inheritance.
//
// Set permission to unmasked if necessary
if (!child.getFsPermission().equals(child.getUnmaskedMode())) {
child.setPermission(child.getUnmaskedMode());
}
if (copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child) == false) {
// No default ACL in parent dir
// Set permission to masked
child.setPermission(child.getMaskedMode());
}
} else {
//
// Old behavior before HDFS-6962.
//
// Set permission to masked if necessary
if (!child.getFsPermission().equals(child.getMaskedMode())) {
child.setPermission(child.getMaskedMode());
}
copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child);
}
{code}
Here {{INode#getUnmaskedMode}} returns the unmasked mode sent by DFSClient;
{{INode#getMaskedMode}} returns the masked mode;
{{INode#isPosixAclInheritanceEnabled}} returns true when the create/mkdir
request comes from a client with HDFS-6962 fix and
{{dfs.namenode.posix.acl.inheritance.enabled}} is true.
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.1.patch
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everythin
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15323941#comment-15323941
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/10/16 6:20 AM:
---
Patch 002 (prototype):
* Create a new class {{FsPermissionDuo}} that extends {{FsPermission}} to store
both masked and unmasked permissions. HDFS client uses it to sneak unmasked
permission from FileContext/FileSystem -> AFS -> Hdfs -> DFSClient -> RPC. NN
uses it to sneak unmasked permission from RPC -> NameNodeRpcServer.create
(placed into PermissionStatus) -> FSNamesystem.startFile ->
FSDirWriterFileOp.startFile/addFile -> INodeFile -> INodeWithAdditionalFields.
* Add field {{unmasked}} to protobuf message {{CreateRequestProto}} and
{{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Modify {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}} to switch between old and new ACL inheritance
behavior.
Questions:
* How to query NN config in {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}}?
* Anyway to avoid adding field FsPermissionDuo to {{INodeWithAdditionalFields}}?
* {{PermissionStatus#applyUMask}} never used, remove it?
* {{DFSClient#mkdirs}} and DFSClient#primitiveMkdir}} use file default if
permission is null. Should use dir default permission?
TODO:
* Investigate the use of permissions in FSDirMkdirOp.createAncestorDirectories
call tree
* Add and run unit tests
* Run system compatibility tests
was (Author: jzhuge):
Patch 002 (prototype):
* Create a new class {{FsPermissionDuo}} that extends {{FsPermission}} to store
both masked and unmasked permissions. HDFS client uses it to sneak unmasked
permission from FileContext/FileSystem -> AFS -> Hdfs -> DFSClient -> RPC. NN
uses it to sneak unmasked permission from RPC -> NameNodeRpcServer.create
(placed into PermissionStatus) -> FSNamesystem.startFile ->
FSDirWriterFileOp.startFile/addFile -> INodeFile -> INodeWithAdditionalFields.
* Add field {{unmasked}} to protobuf message {{CreateRequestProto}} and
{{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Modify {{copyINodeDefaultAcl}} to switch between old and new ACL inheritance
behavior.
TODO:
* Add and run unit tests
* Run system compatibility tests
* Anyway to avoid adding field FsPermissionDuo to {{INodeWithAdditionalFields}}?
* Investigate the use of permissions in FSDirMkdirOp.createAncestorDirectories
call tree
* {{PermissionStatus#applyUMask}} never used, remove it?
* {{DFSClient#mkdirs}} and DFSClient#primitiveMkdir}} use file default if
permission is null. Should use dir default permission?
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.002.patch,
> HDFS-6962.1.patch
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto user with rwx access for inhéritance.
> default:mask::rwx inhéritance mask is rwx, so no mask
> 4/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> 5/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # file: /tmp/ACLS/hdfs
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> user:toto:rwx #effective:r-x
> group::r-x
> group:readwrite:rwx #effective:r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> Here we can see that the readwrite group has rwx ACL bu only r-x is effective
> because the mask is r-x (mask::r-x) in spite of default mask for inheritance
> is set to default:mask::rwx on /tmp/ACLS/
> 6/ Modifiy hdfs-site.xml et restart namenode
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 010
>
> 7/ Create a subdir to test inheritance of ACL with new parameter umaskmode
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS/hdfs2
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15314624#comment-15314624
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/7/16 5:07 AM:
--
Hi [~cnauroth],
In order to maintain backwards compatibility in Hadoop 2.x, could we add a new
NameNode flag {{dfs.namenode.posix.acl.inheritance.enabled}}, default false in
Hadoop 2.x, default true in Hadoop 3?
Changes to message {{CreateRequestProto}} and {{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Add optional field {{FsPermissionProto unmasked}} to store unmasked mode
parameter
* Preserve the existing meaning of field {{FsPermissionProto masked}}: mode +
umask.
* Please note this approach is slightly different from what you suggested
above. I am ok either way but find this a little less possibility for
misunderstanding.
Wrap around {{AclStorage#copyINodeDefaultAcl}}:
{code:java}
if (child.isPosixAclInheritanceEnabled() == true) {
//
// HDFS-6962. POSIX ACL inheritance.
//
// Set permission to unmasked if necessary
if (!child.getFsPermission().equals(child.getUnmaskedMode())) {
child.setPermission(child.getUnmaskedMode());
}
if (copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child) == false) {
// No default ACL in parent dir
// Set permission to masked
child.setPermission(child.getMaskedMode());
}
} else {
//
// Old behavior before HDFS-6962.
//
// Set permission to masked if necessary
if (!child.getFsPermission().equals(child.getMaskedMode())) {
child.setPermission(child.getMaskedMode());
}
copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child);
}
{code}
Here {{INode#getUnmaskedMode}} returns the unmasked mode sent by DFSClient;
{{INode#getMaskedMode}} returns the masked mode;
{{INode#isPosixAclInheritanceEnabled}} returns true when the create/mkdir
request comes from a client with HDFS-6962 fix and
{{dfs.namenode.posix.acl.inheritance.enabled}} is true.
was (Author: jzhuge):
Hi [~cnauroth],
In order to maintain backwards compatibility in Hadoop 2.x, could we add a new
NameNode flag {{dfs.namenode.posix.acl.inheritance.enabled}}, default false in
Hadoop 2.x, default true in Hadoop 3?
Changes to message {{CreateRequestProto}} and {{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Add optional field {{FsPermissionProto unmasked}} to store unmasked mode
parameter
* Preserve the existing meaning of field {{FsPermissionProto masked}}: mode +
umask.
* Please note this approach is slightly different from what you suggested
above. I am ok either way but find this a little less possibility for
misunderstanding.
Wrap around {{AclStorage#copyINodeDefaultAcl}}:
{code:java}
if (child.isPosixAclInheritanceEnabled() == true) {
/*
* HDFS-6962. POSIX ACL inheritance.
*/
// Set permission to unmasked if necessary
if (!child.getFsPermission().equals(child.getUnmaskedMode())) {
child.setPermission(child.getUnmaskedMode());
}
if (AclStorage.copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child) == false) {
// No default ACL in parent dir
// Set permission to masked
child.setPermission(child.getMaskedMode());
}
} else {
/*
* Old behavior before HDFS-6962.
*/
// Set permission to masked if necessary
if (!child.getFsPermission().equals(child.getMaskedMode())) {
child.setPermission(child.getMaskedMode());
}
AclStorage.copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child);
}
{code}
Here {{INode#getUnmaskedMode}} returns the unmasked mode sent by DFSClient;
{{INode#getMaskedMode}} returns the masked mode;
{{INode#isPosixAclInheritanceEnabled}} returns true when the create/mkdir
request come from a client that supports POSIX ACL inheritance and
{{dfs.namenode.posix.acl.inheritance.enabled}} is true.
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.1.patch
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15314624#comment-15314624
]
John Zhuge edited comment on HDFS-6962 at 6/7/16 5:04 AM:
--
Hi [~cnauroth],
In order to maintain backwards compatibility in Hadoop 2.x, could we add a new
NameNode flag {{dfs.namenode.posix.acl.inheritance.enabled}}, default false in
Hadoop 2.x, default true in Hadoop 3?
Changes to message {{CreateRequestProto}} and {{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Add optional field {{FsPermissionProto unmasked}} to store unmasked mode
parameter
* Preserve the existing meaning of field {{FsPermissionProto masked}}: mode +
umask.
* Please note this approach is slightly different from what you suggested
above. I am ok either way but find this a little less possibility for
misunderstanding.
Wrap around {{AclStorage#copyINodeDefaultAcl}}:
{code:java}
if (child.isPosixAclInheritanceEnabled() == true) {
/*
* HDFS-6962. POSIX ACL inheritance.
*/
// Set permission to unmasked if necessary
if (!child.getFsPermission().equals(child.getUnmaskedMode())) {
child.setPermission(child.getUnmaskedMode());
}
if (AclStorage.copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child) == false) {
// No default ACL in parent dir
// Set permission to masked
child.setPermission(child.getMaskedMode());
}
} else {
/*
* Old behavior before HDFS-6962.
*/
// Set permission to masked if necessary
if (!child.getFsPermission().equals(child.getMaskedMode())) {
child.setPermission(child.getMaskedMode());
}
AclStorage.copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child);
}
{code}
Here {{INode#getUnmaskedMode}} returns the unmasked mode sent by DFSClient;
{{INode#getMaskedMode}} returns the masked mode;
{{INode#isPosixAclInheritanceEnabled}} returns true when the create/mkdir
request come from a client that supports POSIX ACL inheritance and
{{dfs.namenode.posix.acl.inheritance.enabled}} is true.
was (Author: jzhuge):
Hi [~cnauroth],
In order to maintain backwards compatibility in Hadoop 2.x, could we add a new
NameNode flag {{dfs.namenode.posix.acl.inheritance}}, default false in Hadoop
2.x, default true in Hadoop 3?
Changes to message {{CreateRequestProto}} and {{MkdirsRequestProto}}
* Add optional field {{FsPermissionProto unmasked}} to store unmasked mode
parameter
* The meaning of the existing field {{FsPermissionProto masked}} stays the
same: mode + umask, for both old and new client.
* Please note this approach is slightly different alternative what you
suggested. I am ok either way.
Wrap around {{AclStorage#copyINodeDefaultAcl}}:
{code:java}
public static void copyINodeDefaultAcl(INode child) {
// Current permission is masked
assert child.getFsPermission().equals(child.getMaskedMode());
if (child.getPosixAclInheritance()) {
// Set permission to unmasked
child.setPermission(child.getUnmaskedMode());
}
if (AclStorage.copyINodeDefaultAclInternal(child) == false) {
// No default ACL in parent dir
if (child.getPosixAclInheritance()) {
// Set permission to masked
child.setPermission(child.getMaskedMode());
}
}
}
{code}
Here {{INode#getUnmaskedMode}} returns the unmasked mode sent by DFSClient;
{{INode#getMaskedMode}} returns the masked mode;
{{INode#getPosixAclInheritance}} returns true when from a new client and the
flag is on.
> ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode
>
>
> Key: HDFS-6962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
>Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Environment: CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>Reporter: LINTE
>Assignee: John Zhuge
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: hadoop, security
> Attachments: HDFS-6962.001.patch, HDFS-6962.1.patch
>
>
> In hdfs-site.xml
>
> dfs.umaskmode
> 027
>
> 1/ Create a directory as superuser
> bash# hdfs dfs -mkdir /tmp/ACLS
> 2/ set default ACLs on this directory rwx access for group readwrite and user
> toto
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:group:readwrite:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> bash# hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user:toto:rwx /tmp/ACLS
> 3/ check ACLs /tmp/ACLS/
> bash# hdfs dfs -getfacl /tmp/ACLS/
> # file: /tmp/ACLS
> # owner: hdfs
> # group: hadoop
> user::rwx
> group::r-x
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:toto:rwx
> default:group::r-x
> default:group:readwrite:rwx
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
> user::rwx | group::r-x | other::--- matches with the umaskmode defined in
> hdfs-site.xml, everything ok !
> default:group:readwrite:rwx allow readwrite group with rwx access for
> inhéritance.
> default:user:toto:rwx allow toto
