Re: [hlds_linux] Binary Support for HLDS with SPARC 64 Sun Ultra 10

2002-12-27 Thread Andrew A. Chen
Is it safe to say that those win32 optimizations only apply to the client,
and not to the win32 server?

At 09:07 PM 12/27/2002, you wrote:

The linux port is all c/c++, the win32 client has ASM in it for the critical
sections (i.e the rendering loop).


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



Re: [hlds_linux] Binary Support for HLDS with SPARC 64 Sun Ultra 10

2002-12-27 Thread Alfreds
The linux port is all c/c++, the win32 client has ASM in it for the critical
sections (i.e the rendering loop).


- Original Message -
From: "Andrew A. Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Binary Support for HLDS with SPARC 64 Sun Ultra 10


> While we're on the subject, does hlds use any ASM, or is it all C/C++?
>
> At 10:52 AM 12/27/2002, you wrote:
> >You can not natively run Intel binary applications on a Sparc server.
> >The only chance you would have would be to find some emulation layer
> >that could handle the intel machine code and convert it to Sparc
> >instructions.  Expect to take a huge hit on something like this if you
> >find it though, you would almost certainly reduce your effective
> >computational power to half.
> >
> >On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 11:24, Plitt, Charles wrote:
> > > I have several Sun Ultra 10's, and would like to run CS on them,
> > however when I try to run the server it dies. I am getting a binary
> > unsupported error. The HLDS engine in built towards Intel binary and not
> > sparc64 binary. Does anyone have a patch or know where one can get a
> > patch to run CS on a Sun Ultra10 Sparc64 machine?
> > >
> > > Charlie Plitt
> > > 1310 Gaming Corporation.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 3:01 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: hlds_linux digest, Vol 1 #1685 - 13 msgs
> > >
> > >
> > > Send hlds_linux mailing list submissions to
> > >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > >   http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > > than "Re: Contents of hlds_linux digest..."
> > >
> > >
> > > Today's Topics:
> > >
> > >1. Re: Restricting users via ping (Chris Siwiec)
> > >2. Re: Restricting users via ping (Rob Sanders)
> > >3. feature request (m0gely)
> > >4. RE: feature request (Alfred Reynolds)
> > >5. Re: feature request (Mad Scientist)
> > >6. Re: feature request (Brian A. Stumm)
> > >7. Re: feature request (Brian A. Stumm)
> > >8. Re: Restricting users via ping (Oscar N)
> > >9. Re: feature request (m0gely)
> > >   10. RE: Restricting users via ping (DaiTengu)
> > >   11. RE: Restricting users via ping (Eric (Deacon))
> > >   12. Re: Restricting users via ping (m0gely)
> > >   13. RE: Restricting users via ping (DaiTengu)
> > >
> > > --__--__--
> > >
> > > Message: 1
> > > From: "Chris Siwiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Restricting users via ping
> > > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:15:24 -0600
> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > halfd ( www.halfd.org )  is what I use.
> > > Plus I block some overseas subnets.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 5:08 PM
> > > Subject: [hlds_linux] Restricting users via ping
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Not sure if this been discussed before, but is there a way to
> > > > prevent/kick users with pings that are too high?
> > > >
> > > > I would like one of the servers I run to be for LPB/National traffic
> > > > only.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I can achieve what I want otherways, but if theres come cfg option
it
> > > > would save me time.
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> > >
> > > --__--__--

Re: [hlds_linux] Binary Support for HLDS with SPARC 64 Sun Ultra 10

2002-12-27 Thread Andrew A. Chen
While we're on the subject, does hlds use any ASM, or is it all C/C++?

At 10:52 AM 12/27/2002, you wrote:

You can not natively run Intel binary applications on a Sparc server.
The only chance you would have would be to find some emulation layer
that could handle the intel machine code and convert it to Sparc
instructions.  Expect to take a huge hit on something like this if you
find it though, you would almost certainly reduce your effective
computational power to half.

On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 11:24, Plitt, Charles wrote:
> I have several Sun Ultra 10's, and would like to run CS on them,
however when I try to run the server it dies. I am getting a binary
unsupported error. The HLDS engine in built towards Intel binary and not
sparc64 binary. Does anyone have a patch or know where one can get a
patch to run CS on a Sun Ultra10 Sparc64 machine?
>
> Charlie Plitt
> 1310 Gaming Corporation.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 3:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: hlds_linux digest, Vol 1 #1685 - 13 msgs
>
>
> Send hlds_linux mailing list submissions to
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>   http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of hlds_linux digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: Restricting users via ping (Chris Siwiec)
>2. Re: Restricting users via ping (Rob Sanders)
>3. feature request (m0gely)
>4. RE: feature request (Alfred Reynolds)
>5. Re: feature request (Mad Scientist)
>6. Re: feature request (Brian A. Stumm)
>7. Re: feature request (Brian A. Stumm)
>8. Re: Restricting users via ping (Oscar N)
>9. Re: feature request (m0gely)
>   10. RE: Restricting users via ping (DaiTengu)
>   11. RE: Restricting users via ping (Eric (Deacon))
>   12. Re: Restricting users via ping (m0gely)
>   13. RE: Restricting users via ping (DaiTengu)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "Chris Siwiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Restricting users via ping
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:15:24 -0600
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> halfd ( www.halfd.org )  is what I use.
> Plus I block some overseas subnets.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 5:08 PM
> Subject: [hlds_linux] Restricting users via ping
>
>
> >
> >
> > Not sure if this been discussed before, but is there a way to
> > prevent/kick users with pings that are too high?
> >
> > I would like one of the servers I run to be for LPB/National traffic
> > only.
> >
> >
> > I can achieve what I want otherways, but if theres come cfg option it
> > would save me time.
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:22:31 -0500
> From: Rob Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Restricting users via ping
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:08:05 -0500, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
> > Not sure if this been discussed before, but is there a way to
> > prevent/kick users with pings that are too high?
> >
> > I would like one of the servers I run to be for LPB/National traffic
> > only.
> >
> >
> > I can achieve what I want otherways, but if theres come cfg option it
> > would save me time.
>
> Try halfd.org, very usefull tool in many ways.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:33:38 -0800
> From: m0gely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [hlds_linux] feature request
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Could the server give out the needed info so the query programs
> can tell what team (CS) the players are on?  This info is in the
> logs but not available to (perl) requests I guess.  I am not sure
> about the other mods.  Ref this post:
>
>
http://psychostats.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=24864&sid=59150acd19dc027415a4584a90dc54e4#24864
>
> --
> - m0gely
> http://quake2.telestream.com/
> Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: Alfred Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Half-Life Dedicated Linux Server Mailing List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] feature request
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:45:49 -0800
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This would break all existing query programs (as they depend on the current
> syntax of the "players" query) so adding it to the existing response is not
> an option.
>
> There is a 

Re: [hlds_linux] Binary Support for HLDS with SPARC 64 Sun Ultra 10

2002-12-27 Thread Infrared
You can not natively run Intel binary applications on a Sparc server.
The only chance you would have would be to find some emulation layer
that could handle the intel machine code and convert it to Sparc
instructions.  Expect to take a huge hit on something like this if you
find it though, you would almost certainly reduce your effective
computational power to half.

On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 11:24, Plitt, Charles wrote:
> I have several Sun Ultra 10's, and would like to run CS on them, however when I try 
>to run the server it dies. I am getting a binary unsupported error. The HLDS engine 
>in built towards Intel binary and not sparc64 binary. Does anyone have a patch or 
>know where one can get a patch to run CS on a Sun Ultra10 Sparc64 machine?
>
> Charlie Plitt
> 1310 Gaming Corporation.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 3:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: hlds_linux digest, Vol 1 #1685 - 13 msgs
>
>
> Send hlds_linux mailing list submissions to
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>   http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of hlds_linux digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: Restricting users via ping (Chris Siwiec)
>2. Re: Restricting users via ping (Rob Sanders)
>3. feature request (m0gely)
>4. RE: feature request (Alfred Reynolds)
>5. Re: feature request (Mad Scientist)
>6. Re: feature request (Brian A. Stumm)
>7. Re: feature request (Brian A. Stumm)
>8. Re: Restricting users via ping (Oscar N)
>9. Re: feature request (m0gely)
>   10. RE: Restricting users via ping (DaiTengu)
>   11. RE: Restricting users via ping (Eric (Deacon))
>   12. Re: Restricting users via ping (m0gely)
>   13. RE: Restricting users via ping (DaiTengu)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "Chris Siwiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Restricting users via ping
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:15:24 -0600
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> halfd ( www.halfd.org )  is what I use.
> Plus I block some overseas subnets.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 5:08 PM
> Subject: [hlds_linux] Restricting users via ping
>
>
> >
> >
> > Not sure if this been discussed before, but is there a way to
> > prevent/kick users with pings that are too high?
> >
> > I would like one of the servers I run to be for LPB/National traffic
> > only.
> >
> >
> > I can achieve what I want otherways, but if theres come cfg option it
> > would save me time.
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:22:31 -0500
> From: Rob Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Restricting users via ping
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:08:05 -0500, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
> > Not sure if this been discussed before, but is there a way to
> > prevent/kick users with pings that are too high?
> >
> > I would like one of the servers I run to be for LPB/National traffic
> > only.
> >
> >
> > I can achieve what I want otherways, but if theres come cfg option it
> > would save me time.
>
> Try halfd.org, very usefull tool in many ways.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:33:38 -0800
> From: m0gely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [hlds_linux] feature request
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Could the server give out the needed info so the query programs
> can tell what team (CS) the players are on?  This info is in the
> logs but not available to (perl) requests I guess.  I am not sure
> about the other mods.  Ref this post:
>
> 
>http://psychostats.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=24864&sid=59150acd19dc027415a4584a90dc54e4#24864
>
> --
> - m0gely
> http://quake2.telestream.com/
> Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: Alfred Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Half-Life Dedicated Linux Server Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] feature request
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:45:49 -0800
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This would break all existing query programs (as they depend on the current
> syntax of the "players" query) so adding it to the existing response is not
> an option.
>
> There is a plan to add a more extensive querying system to HL in the future,
> but right now there is no ETA on