Re: [HOT] built-up areas
I think another problem is are we mapping the buildings that are there or using a generated approximation, which is more useful? I sometimes wonder when I see buildings that aren't quite square practically speaking does it really matter? We have the rough size and position. Square ones do look prettier though oh if only we could just nudge the new mappers into the JOSM building_tool plugin. Cheerio John On 31 August 2015 at 21:33, Kamal P wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for pointing out the issues about the built up areas in Nepal. We > did have troubles while trying to digitize with the newer OSM users. > Consistency is one of the harder things to achieve with newer volunteers, > specifically if we can't enforce any methods or rules by limiting how the > buildings should be digitized. > > I was wondering about the ArcGIS built-up area tool (delineate built up > area tool). We do need the input building (in_building) data. We can remind > the volunteers to be consistent next time we have a mapathon or remind them > with these emails, but we do need that initial input data even though the > quality might be compromised. Anyone with a suggestion to a standard > methodology?? > > I should be able to help with some of the work on the built up area > delineation. > > > Kamal > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Daniel Specht > wrote: > >> A lot of work is going into creating built-up areas, but the results are >> inconsistent. People do good work, but there is no standard method. >> >> Once buildings have been mapped (example: much of the Nepal project >> #1018) built-up areas don't need to be done by hand. I used an automated >> tool to generate built-up areas from as small area in Nepal, and the >> results are at >> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B79TF0JkJwBffjIybGRVd2VNVllkdGd1bFBJdzJWUzdjM3N5Q1pDYm5NbGJuNVcxRXA1UjA&usp=sharing >> . >> >> The polygons generated by the tool are more consistent, and have a higher >> density of buildings than those drawn by hand. >> >> The tool, which is part of ESRI ArcGIS Advanced, (i.e. ArcInfo), allows >> the user to decide the minimum number of buildings per area, and the >> maximum distance between buildings. >> >> If there is a large area with buildings mapped, someone with that tool or >> a similar tool could generate built-up areas for that entire area. This >> would also be good for updating built-up areas after new housing was built. >> I'd be happy do do some of this work. >> >> -- >> Dan >> >> ___ >> HOT mailing list >> HOT@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> > > ___ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] built-up areas
Hi Dan, Thanks for pointing out the issues about the built up areas in Nepal. We did have troubles while trying to digitize with the newer OSM users. Consistency is one of the harder things to achieve with newer volunteers, specifically if we can't enforce any methods or rules by limiting how the buildings should be digitized. I was wondering about the ArcGIS built-up area tool (delineate built up area tool). We do need the input building (in_building) data. We can remind the volunteers to be consistent next time we have a mapathon or remind them with these emails, but we do need that initial input data even though the quality might be compromised. Anyone with a suggestion to a standard methodology?? I should be able to help with some of the work on the built up area delineation. Kamal On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Daniel Specht wrote: > A lot of work is going into creating built-up areas, but the results are > inconsistent. People do good work, but there is no standard method. > > Once buildings have been mapped (example: much of the Nepal project #1018) > built-up areas don't need to be done by hand. I used an automated tool to > generate built-up areas from as small area in Nepal, and the results are at > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B79TF0JkJwBffjIybGRVd2VNVllkdGd1bFBJdzJWUzdjM3N5Q1pDYm5NbGJuNVcxRXA1UjA&usp=sharing > . > > The polygons generated by the tool are more consistent, and have a higher > density of buildings than those drawn by hand. > > The tool, which is part of ESRI ArcGIS Advanced, (i.e. ArcInfo), allows > the user to decide the minimum number of buildings per area, and the > maximum distance between buildings. > > If there is a large area with buildings mapped, someone with that tool or > a similar tool could generate built-up areas for that entire area. This > would also be good for updating built-up areas after new housing was built. > I'd be happy do do some of this work. > > -- > Dan > > ___ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
[HOT] built-up areas
A lot of work is going into creating built-up areas, but the results are inconsistent. People do good work, but there is no standard method. Once buildings have been mapped (example: much of the Nepal project #1018) built-up areas don't need to be done by hand. I used an automated tool to generate built-up areas from as small area in Nepal, and the results are at https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B79TF0JkJwBffjIybGRVd2VNVllkdGd1bFBJdzJWUzdjM3N5Q1pDYm5NbGJuNVcxRXA1UjA&usp=sharing . The polygons generated by the tool are more consistent, and have a higher density of buildings than those drawn by hand. The tool, which is part of ESRI ArcGIS Advanced, (i.e. ArcInfo), allows the user to decide the minimum number of buildings per area, and the maximum distance between buildings. If there is a large area with buildings mapped, someone with that tool or a similar tool could generate built-up areas for that entire area. This would also be good for updating built-up areas after new housing was built. I'd be happy do do some of this work. -- Dan ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
