Re: [Tools-discuss] meta-issues on charter discussions
On 2009-08-24 18:15 Richard Barnes said the following: > As a side issue, it appears that Ekr is chairing TLS twice, at least > according to the linked TLS tools page. > --Richard Yah. That's something the secretariat will have to fix in the metadata for the WG; the tools page just uses the info which is in the database. Best, Henrik ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: [Tools-discuss] meta-issues on charter discussions
As a side issue, it appears that Ekr is chairing TLS twice, at least according to the linked TLS tools page. --Richard On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:55 AM, wrote: > The tools WG pages used to have diffs between charter versions > (see e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/tls/charters/ -- the "delta" > symbol leads to side-by-side diff between the versions), but > it looks like this broke when new www.ietf.org was deployed > in July > > Best regards, > Pasi > >> -Original Message- >> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> ext Tony Hansen >> Sent: 21 August, 2009 17:57 >> To: tools-disc...@ietf.org >> Cc: ietf@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: meta-issues on charter discussions >> >> This was posted to the ietf list. >> >> While the charter history pages are nice, they can be made better using >> a format similar to how tools.ietf.org presents RFCs and I-Ds: a >> non-printing list of versions at the top with ways to show differences >> between versions. >> >> Sounds like a job for the tools team. :-) >> >> Tony Hansen >> t...@att.com >> >> Thomas Narten wrote: >> > Re: old charters and such. >> > >> > While poking around earlier this week, I found: >> > >> > http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/history/ >> > >> > (it is hanging of the WG pages, so not that hard to find.) >> > >> > It appears to be a snapshot of charters whenever they change. But, >> > they "change" often due to events that are probably not the kind of >> > changes we are thinking about, and there is no indication about what >> > has changed, so there are a lot of copies and wading through them to >> > find stuff appears pretty daunting. And the history only goes back 3 >> > years or so... >> > >> > But they might be a basis for some tools to extract stuff. But, if >> > tools are going to do this, it seems like an archival format other >> > than HTML would be desirable. >> >> ___ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > ___ > Tools-discuss mailing list > tools-disc...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: [Tools-discuss] meta-issues on charter discussions
Hi Tony, Pasi, On 2009-08-24 09:55 pasi.ero...@nokia.com said the following: > The tools WG pages used to have diffs between charter versions > (see e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/tls/charters/ -- the "delta" > symbol leads to side-by-side diff between the versions), but > it looks like this broke when new www.ietf.org was deployed > in July Ouch. Mmm. I'll see if I can fix this. Henrik > Best regards, > Pasi > >> -Original Message- >> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> ext Tony Hansen >> Sent: 21 August, 2009 17:57 >> To: tools-disc...@ietf.org >> Cc: ietf@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: meta-issues on charter discussions >> >> This was posted to the ietf list. >> >> While the charter history pages are nice, they can be made better using >> a format similar to how tools.ietf.org presents RFCs and I-Ds: a >> non-printing list of versions at the top with ways to show differences >> between versions. >> >> Sounds like a job for the tools team. :-) >> >> Tony Hansen >> t...@att.com >> >> Thomas Narten wrote: >>> Re: old charters and such. >>> >>> While poking around earlier this week, I found: >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/history/ >>> >>> (it is hanging of the WG pages, so not that hard to find.) >>> >>> It appears to be a snapshot of charters whenever they change. But, >>> they "change" often due to events that are probably not the kind of >>> changes we are thinking about, and there is no indication about what >>> has changed, so there are a lot of copies and wading through them to >>> find stuff appears pretty daunting. And the history only goes back 3 >>> years or so... >>> >>> But they might be a basis for some tools to extract stuff. But, if >>> tools are going to do this, it seems like an archival format other >>> than HTML would be desirable. >> ___ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > ___ > Tools-discuss mailing list > tools-disc...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf