from:"Anshu Prateek"

Re: Meeting Agenda Item: Introduction - Anshu Prateek

2016-02-04 Thread Anshu Prateek

On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 at 20:37 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 05:16:20AM +0000, Anshu Prateek wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Â I am Anshu Prateek (@anshprat), a Fedora Infrastructure Apprentice
> >Alumni from 2013 [1][2]. I have been a regular user of Fedora since
> FC3,
> >and I love to contribute back whenever possible[3]. My day job is
> that of
> >a devops and tools/platforms developer.
> >
> >I ve been a passive member after I left, though regularly reading
> most of
> >the emails on the list here. I can now afford some time (and in part
> >motivated by
> >https://www.hackerearth.com/sprints/open-source-india-hacks-2016/ )
> to
> >become an active member again.
> >
> >To start off, I would take a jab at
> >https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/issues/299
>
> Hi and welcome!
>
> You're welcome to take a stab at this one if you like, I think we should
> approach it as follows:
> - Write a script to reproduce the problem in prod
> - Set-up a local instance of pkgdb2
> - Try to reproduce the problem on the local instance using the script from
> step
>   1).
>
> If we can't reproduce, then we'll have to think further, check the logs on
> the
> machines and see if we can find more indices of what's going on.
>
>
Thanks, will do a local setup and check.
Can't attend the meeting today, will ping you in the irc later tomorrow for
any help or other pointers.



>
> Pierre
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
-- 
regards
Anshu Prateek
+91.991.610.2967
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Meeting Agenda Item: Introduction - Anshu Prateek

2016-01-29 Thread Anshu Prateek

 Hi all,

 I am Anshu Prateek (@anshprat), a Fedora Infrastructure Apprentice Alumni
from 2013 [1][2]. I have been a regular user of Fedora since FC3, and I
love to contribute back whenever possible[3]. My day job is that of a
devops and tools/platforms developer.

I ve been a passive member after I left, though regularly reading most of
the emails on the list here. I can now afford some time (and in part
motivated by
https://www.hackerearth.com/sprints/open-source-india-hacks-2016/ ) to
become an active member again.

To start off, I would take a jab at
https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/issues/299 and
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5084

I would need to be added to fi-apprentice to look at the logs for the above.

 Looking forward to working with the community again :)

 cheers
Anshu Prateek

[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/PZLDI5YCISAT435F2AV46R7ZPAHJKMRR/
[2]
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=closed=anshprat
[3] https://badges.fedoraproject.org/user/anshprat
-- 
regards
Anshu Prateek
+91.991.610.2967
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review for new rbac_playbook

2014-06-07 Thread Anshu Prateek

mmm, for your attack strategy to work, basically the attacker need to
have enough permissions in the first place to be able to execute the
playbook such that the playbooks have access to the mysql secret? And if he
already has that kinda permission, then there is no need to do a setup
first and then read it coz the attacker can read it upfront without doing
the setup.

I think this is controlled by the..

def can_run(acl, groups, playbook_file):

?



On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:

 Le mercredi 04 juin 2014 à 19:45 -0600, Tim Flink a écrit :
  I've been working to rewrite and extend the script that we've been
  using to control playbook execution for folks who are not in
  sysadmin-main.
 
  https://bitbucket.org/tflink/rbac-ansible
 
  I've been testing the script but before we actually start using it on
  lockbox01, I'd appreciate a review of the code to make sure I didn't
  miss any security holes.
 
  Injection attacks shouldn't be an issue due to usage of os.execv - all
  injection attempts are grouped as a single argument and will not be
  broken up.

 So, I just have one question. how does the option -P of the script is
 supposed to behave ?

 Can i assume that I would be able to say use this playbook, but instead
 of using the port 22, use port 1234 without changing the playbook ?

 In this case, I think this would mean that if I can create a ssh tunnel
 on the remote server ( listening to port 1234 to a server I control,
 with ssh -L 1234:servericontrol:22 ), then I can make the playbook
 played on a server I control, which in turn mean that I would
 potentially get access to files with password that I may not have access
 too.

 Example, the playbook that deploy mediawiki would deploy mediawiki on my
 server, then i can go as root look at the mysql credentials deployed in
 the configuration file. Or I can look at the https certificates that
 were deployed, etc, etc.


 I do not know if such attack schema would matter for Fedora infra, but
 if the user running ansible ( after sudo, is sudoed a word ? ) has
 access to passwords that the initial user don't, and if there is no
 firewall internally ( ie, the tunnel trick would work, no firewall
 between lockbock and the server ), and if the attack/initial user can
 ssh to a server without much access, then, this would work.

 ( if not, I may just have won the Oscar for the most convoluted attack
 of the week )
 --
 Michael Scherer

 ___
 infrastructure mailing list
 infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Re: Ansible and parallelism

2014-02-07 Thread Anshu Prateek

mm, I think the -f option is only for command line ansible and not for
playbook?


On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Joerg Stephan johe.step...@ymail.comwrote:

  I guess you want

 --fork number

 to set the number o forks

 Cheers



 On 07.02.2014 15:27, Anshu Prateek wrote:

 Use the serial keyword
 http://docs.ansible.com/playbooks_delegation.html


 On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Aurélien Bompard gau...@free.fr 
 gau...@free.fr wrote:


   Hi y'all!


 Small ansible question: I have this ansible playbook which uploads and
 runs a script to set some permissions in the database. This worked fine
 while the playbook was only executed on a single server, but now that
 mailman01 and 02 are being setup for prod, the script is executed on both
 machines, and tries to set the permissions in the same DB server at the
 same time, which produces a psycopg2.InternalError (tuple concurrently
 updated).

 Any idea how I can ask Ansible to not run this task in parallel on both
 servers? Any other way around this?


 Thanks,

 Aurélien

 ___
 infrastructure mailing 
 listinfrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure



 ___
 infrastructure mailing 
 listinfrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure



 ___
 infrastructure mailing list
 infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices

2013-11-07 Thread Anshu Prateek

Replies inline:


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:

 Greetings.

 You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group
 in the fedora account system. When you reply, please include your
 fedora account system login.

 Additionally, this month, I am CC'ing the infrastructure list. If you
 would like to send your feedback there as well everyone can see and
 comment on it.

 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice

 At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an
 email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for
 you.

 I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the
 following data or anything related you can think of that might help us
 make the apprentice program more useful.

 0. Whats your fedora account system login?


anshprat



 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at
 our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to?


yes n yes



 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute
 to more?

yes, I will  be contributing more on apps side.




 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice
 'easyfix' tickets?
 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/14


mm, the task I am working on started as a simple improve
latency/performance of askbot which evolved into upgrade 0.7.49 which
became packaged 0.7.49. I am mostly done, now only packaging and testing on
fedora/rawhide is left. Its done for epel. I vent been able to spend much
time on it last few weeks. Have just been doing something like 4 hours a
week.



 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever
 reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road?


yes



 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help
 you do any of the above?





 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved?
 Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you?
 Finding tickets in your interest area?




 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them
 helpful or interesting?


yes . helps to know what others are doing and whats happening in the apps
world.



 8. What do you use to read your email?


mostly browser/laptop and mobile.



 Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including
 improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc.


How about pairing apprentices up? Nothing mandatory , but this would help
new folks to discover more stuff and help each other? I discovered the
whole mock / bodhi / koji infra only when I had to pack. And can help new
folks with it now.

Also would help us to retain more folks around. Of the last two months I ve
been here, I think I ve seen few of the apprentices repeatedly in the
meetings atleast..



 Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the
 group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or
 whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the
 group up to date with active folks).

 Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback!

 kevin

___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's Fedora Infrastructure meeting (2013-10-24)

2013-10-24 Thread Anshu Prateek

welcome all new folks!

rtnpro and sayan : hi, am working on the askbot 0.7.49 packaging and would
love to have an extra pair of eyes and hands to help :)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010166

I am tied up this week, but would be available from 10/26 (tomorrow night).

I am in India timezone and can join you guys for a quick irc meet after
tomorrow night.

Feel free to check the bug and mail me / work on it as you deem fit.

regards
Anshu Prateek
@anshprat


On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:

 
 #fedora-meeting: Infrastructure (2013-10-24)
 


 Meeting started by nirik at 19:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available at

 http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-10-24/infrastructure.2013-10-24-19.00.log.html
 .



 Meeting summary
 ---
 * welcome y'all  (nirik, 19:00:02)

 * New folks introductions and Apprentice tasks  (nirik, 19:01:41)

 * Applications status / discussion  (nirik, 19:09:14)
   * http://ambre.pingoured.fr/fedora-infra/ is a current list of
 outstanding pull requests for fedora-infra github projects. Please
 help review them.  (nirik, 19:14:57)
   * faitout implementation: http://209.132.184.152/faitout/  (nirik,
 19:15:29)
   * fedocal 0.3 is making great progress. Out soon. Preview at:
 https://209.132.184.147/  (nirik, 19:15:53)
   * new fedora-tagger in staging:
 https://apps.stg.fedoraproject.org/tagger  (nirik, 19:17:13)
   * LINK: https://github.com/fedora-infra/tahrir/issues/174
 (threebean, 19:19:15)
   * LINK: https://github.com/fedora-infra/tahrir/issues/163
 (threebean, 19:19:19)
   * LINK: https://github.com/rajcze/testdays_frontend and jskladan would
 be the one to talk to.  (nirik, 19:21:10)
   * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Search   (nirik,
 19:33:53)
   * renewed discussion of search solutions, will bring up on list/update
 wiki pages  (nirik, 19:36:07)

 * Sysadmin status / discussion  (nirik, 19:36:20)

 * Upcoming Tasks/Items  (nirik, 19:45:35)
   * LINK: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/list/infrastructure/
 (nirik, 19:45:36)

 * Open Floor  (nirik, 19:46:33)

 Meeting ended at 19:51:24 UTC.




 Action Items
 





 Action Items, by person
 ---
 * **UNASSIGNED**
   * (none)




 People Present (lines said)
 ---
 * nirik (98)
 * frankieonuonga (42)
 * threebean (26)
 * pingou (26)
 * kushal (15)
 * rtnpro (11)
 * smooge (8)
 * tflink (7)
 * croberts (7)
 * zodbot (6)
 * sayan (4)
 * besser82 (3)
 * charul (3)
 * lmacken (2)
 * ynchen (1)
 * cpallares (1)
 * misc (1)
 * ianweller (1)
 * ausmarton (1)
 * relrod (0)
 * mdomsch (0)
 * puiterwijk (0)
 * abadger1999 (0)
 * dgilmore (0)
 --
 19:00:02 nirik #startmeeting Infrastructure (2013-10-24)
 19:00:02 zodbot Meeting started Thu Oct 24 19:00:02 2013 UTC.  The chair
 is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
 19:00:02 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link
 #topic.
 19:00:02 nirik #meetingname infrastructure
 19:00:02 zodbot The meeting name has been set to 'infrastructure'
 19:00:02 nirik #topic welcome y'all
 19:00:02 nirik #chair smooge relrod nirik abadger1999 lmacken dgilmore
 mdomsch threebean pingou puiterwijk
 19:00:02 zodbot Current chairs: abadger1999 dgilmore lmacken mdomsch
 nirik pingou puiterwijk relrod smooge threebean
 19:00:30 threebean :)
 19:00:31 * lmacken
 19:00:34 * pingou here
 19:00:35 * ynchen here
 19:00:39 smooge here
 19:00:42 kushal Kushal is here
 19:00:44 * frankieonuonga is here
 19:01:11 nirik hey everyone.
 19:01:17 croberts hi nirik
 19:01:34 frankieonuonga nirik: hi
 19:01:41 nirik #topic New folks introductions and Apprentice tasks
 19:01:42 frankieonuonga croberts: hi
 19:01:53 croberts frankieonuonga: hey
 19:01:54 * ausmarton is here
 19:01:56 nirik any new folks today? or apprentices with questions or
 comments?
 19:02:11 kushal nirik, I want some tasks :)
 19:02:13 pingou and there she comes :)
 19:02:28 * ianweller is sorta here
 19:02:28 nirik kushal: cool. ;) we will see what we can come up with.
 19:02:32 nirik there's the easyfix ones...
 19:02:56 croberts nirik: i am going to close out ticket 3765
 19:03:14 nirik .ticket 3765
 19:03:15 zodbot nirik: #3765 (wiki login timeout too short) – Fedora
 Infrastructure -
 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3765
 19:03:16 croberts everything is working as normal for timeouts tested it
 with 1 other person and multiple machines
 19:03:24 nirik ok, great!
 19:03:27 croberts :)
 19:03:31 sayan nirik, hi, i am new today :)
 19:03:44 nirik sayan: welcome. :)
 19:03:51 frankieonuonga welcome sayan
 19:03:58 threebean we have some OPW people around for the first time
 today
 19:04:04 nirik sayan: are you more interested in sysadmin type tasks? or
 application maint/development?
 19:04:04

Re: rdiff-backup doc in infra docs

2013-10-21 Thread Anshu Prateek

Few things
- its not mentioned that it runs rdiff as root. (guessing from sudo -i for
adding the key).
- guess its a pull backup than a push from the nodes being backed up?
- location of the backups on the filer?

regards
Anshu Prateek


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:

 Greetings.

 I just added a new doc to our infra-docs repo:

 http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/docs/rdiff-backup.txt

 Review/feedback welcome. Are there any unclear parts? Anything not
 mentioned that would be good to know about backups?

 Also, I'm going to do some restores from rdiff-backup in the coming
 week and confirm all is looking ok. If it is, I am going to look at
 stopping our bacula updates after Beta is out. Then we need to look at
 some backup setup to backup our rdiff-backups (on netapp disk) to tape
 (just in case). Suggestions for something to do those backups welcome.

 kevin

 ___
 infrastructure mailing list
 infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Re: ask.fp.o low ranking in Google

2013-10-18 Thread Anshu Prateek

well,

Just because ask.fpo is fedora hosted , that doesn't mean its the best
source of content.

For this specific query, infact there are no questions on ask.fpo

https://ask.fedoraproject.org/questions/scope:all/sort:activity-desc/query:fedora%2019%20install%20fails/page:1/

SEO project aside, content is king.

As to it being useless, AFAIK, its just a fedora hosted app, not an
official documentation or answering place. fedora forums have been around
for years now, ask.fpo for months.

I would rather have a user directed to a valid answer than ask.fpo with no
results.

my 2 cents.

regards
Anshu Prateek

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:

Hi,

I am wondering why anytime I am searching some issue with Fedora,
ask.fedoraproject.org is never shown in Google's results. How is that?
That should be one of ours primary sources of answers for common questions.

For example, when I google for fedora 19 installation fails, on first
page I get referecnes to

* fedora wiki
* fedoraforum.org
* wikihow
* bugzilla
* google groups
* and some other unknown pages

ask.fp.o does not appear on first 10 pages of Google. I am afraid it is
useless service unless it appears in Google.

Any thoughts?

Thanks

Vít
__**_
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.**fedoraproject.orginfrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/**infrastructurehttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Re: How we handle attacks?

2013-10-06 Thread Anshu Prateek

I guess you are talking about ssh access?

Most of these logins are automated bot attempts. On my personal servers,
one easy way I have found is changing the default port to something else
and that cuts down my lastb by almost 99%!


On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:

 I see in log file of copr-fe-dev a lot of attempts to login as
 root/postgres/nagios/oracl/**test user. Well it is ~4000 attempts. So it
 depend on your definition of lot of. But it caught my attention.

 Do we have some standard procedure how to handle it? Add that IPs to
 blacklist? Move ssh port to non standard number? Or should I just ignore
 them?
 --
 Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
 Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
 __**_
 infrastructure mailing list
 infrastructure@lists.**fedoraproject.orginfrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/**infrastructurehttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Re: Migrating to our own bugzilla instance.

2013-09-17 Thread Anshu Prateek

hi Johann,

I can empathise with you on the frustration that comes from a certain
feature or ease not available to Fedora community due to non-alignment or
low priority against RH business needs.

Since this issue has apparently been discussed for a while, one thing that
I find amiss from the doc that pingou mentioned is the 'Why' ? I will
suggest you add the problems you face to that doc. So when we revisit the
page, the list of whys over there make it easy to make a decision. (You
did mention the whys in the mail response, but would make it better to note
and keep adding in the doc).

The first two points on problems/issues over in the doc would be my biggest
concern (resource scarcity). Though I agree that cannot assign to rhel
would be a trivial one.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Fedora_bug_tracker#Why_does_Fedora_need_its_own_BZ.3F





On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 On 09/17/2013 09:44 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:

 On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:24:58AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:

 Greetings

 I think it's time that we start putting some effort into both
 discussing and migrating away from sharing bugzilla instance with
 Red Hat.

 This is indeed a big question that has been in the air for some time
 without
 any real conclusion reached.
 Since you're speaking about, I assume you know about:
 https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/Infrastructure_Fedora_**bug_trackerhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Fedora_bug_tracker


 No I was unaware of that but skimming over it this cannot clone bugs over
 to rhel packages/products easily. is irrelevant point in that discussion +
 which instance it should be should be decide in good collaboration with the
 QA community since we are arguably the largest userbase of it.



 If you have any inputs/ideas feel free to share them, we have already
 discussed
 more than once about it but so far the disadvantages and work implied have
 out-weight the advantages.

 One of the big point being the definition of who is we in your sentence.


 The project/community in whole but as I have mentioned to Kevin atleast on
 one occasion if it boils down to it I will personally put my free time in
 running and administrative that instance since my frustration level with RH
 bugzilla has grown to an all time high due to frequent collision with
 internal RH administrative policy's that nobody in the community knows
 exactly which are,frequent RH employement mistakes in bug handling between
 Fedora and RHEL as well as several other issue we are faced with it in the
 QA community and the hindrance it serves to the growth to our community and
 the fact we cant hack in it directly to make ours as well as other
 processes work smoothly which makes everybody's life easier.



  For the first should we migrate all issues from the RH bugzilla to
 keep history or should we simply declare a flag day and from that
 point on everybody will be using the new bug tracker

 Secondly do people have any option on which bug tracker we should
 migrate to as in should we stick to mozilla's bugzilla or should we
 use something else?

 You do realize that here you're speaking about migration w/o knowing to
 what
 will be the migration? Seems like the reverse order to me.


 Not really we can reach the decision based upon if we would like to
 migrate older bugs to keep history  or if we would skip that step and
 choose to use a fresh deployment and simply use the RH bugzilla instance
  strictly for historic lookup in bugs purpose for EOL releases.

 JBG

 __**_
 infrastructure mailing list
 infrastructure@lists.**fedoraproject.orginfrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/**infrastructurehttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Re: Diagnosing Ask Fedora sluggishness

2013-09-08 Thread Anshu Prateek

The generic yslow grades suggest couple of improvements:

Grade F on Add Expires headers

There are 55 static components without a far-future expiration date.
Grade F on Configure entity tags (ETags) There are 27 components with
misconfigured ETags

Grade E on Use cookie-free domainsThere are 9 components that are not
cookie-free

And some more.

All of these for https://ask.fedoraproject.org/questions/

Also, I was about to send a similar mail about site being slow for the
badges. Are these two sharing the hosts?


On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Anshu Prateek anshp...@gmail.com wrote:

 Oh, and can we enable gzip compression on the ask hosts? (I don't know
 how to do it yet.)

 Its in the apache config file.

 http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_deflate.html#enable


 On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 08:08 +0530, Aditya Patawari wrote:
  Hi Ankur,

 Hi Aditya,

 
  From what I see, after comparing the time used to load each asset,
  there are a couple of java scripts, util.js and less.min.js, on Ask
  Fedora, which takes quite a bit to load. Could it be because of this?

 I'm really not sure. I did some random checking and found a few hints,
 but nothing concret:


 http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/dmLsqz/http://ask.fedoraproject.org/questions/

 http://askbot.org/en/question/3172/how-to-improve-the-speed-of-askbot/

 
  Although there seems to be a varnish cache to deliver it quicker but
  somehow the load time runs in many seconds.

 It probably is the JS, since it's the commenting and voting etc part
 that takes time, and this seems to be JS controlled.

 http://askbot.org/en/question/8514/why-does-askbot-require-javascript/

 Any ideas on how we could speed this up?

 Oh, and can we enable gzip compression on the ask hosts? (I don't know
 how to do it yet.)
 --
 Thanks,
 Warm regards,
 Ankur (FranciscoD)

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

 Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG


 ___
 infrastructure mailing list
 infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure



___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Meeting Agenda Item: Introduction Anshu Prateek