Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: allow root to submit secure buffers even if !master

2013-07-17 Thread Jesse Barnes 
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:20:07 +0100
Chris Wilson  wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:45:30AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > This should allow userland tools running under X to submit secure
> > batches for various things.  This gives master DRM clients slightly more
> > permissions, but doesn't give regular processes any more, since a root
> > process can already map the registers directly and poke at hw.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |8 
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > index 1b58694..377aa1f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > @@ -858,10 +858,10 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void 
> > *data,
> >  
> > flags = 0;
> > if (args->flags & I915_EXEC_SECURE) {
> > -   if (!file->is_master || !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> > +   if (!f(ile->is_master || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)))
> > return -EPERM;
> 
> Would have made for a much smaller patch.

And maybe without the typo? :)

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: allow root to submit secure buffers even if !master

2013-07-17 Thread Chris Wilson 
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:45:30AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> This should allow userland tools running under X to submit secure
> batches for various things.  This gives master DRM clients slightly more
> permissions, but doesn't give regular processes any more, since a root
> process can already map the registers directly and poke at hw.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |8 
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 1b58694..377aa1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -858,10 +858,10 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void 
> *data,
>  
>   flags = 0;
>   if (args->flags & I915_EXEC_SECURE) {
> - if (!file->is_master || !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + if (!f(ile->is_master || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)))
>   return -EPERM;

Would have made for a much smaller patch.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx