[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14175474#comment-14175474 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - Looks like there isn't yet a 2.18 version of surefire-junit47. Since this only seems to be hitting branch-1, is it worth just reverting HBASE-4955 for now, [~eclark]? > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14175824#comment-14175824 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- Weird [~dimaspivak] It just passed. https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-1.0/326/ A few test failures look a little dodgy but others look legit. You think it the surefire plugin? Ain't we running same verison on trunk which has been passing usually? > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14175892#comment-14175892 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - :-( Looks like it failed again, [~stack]. Starting with [#312|https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-1.0/312/], the build has failed with console output reading {code} [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.17:test (secondPartTestsExecution) on project hbase-server: ExecutionException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.IOException: Stream Closed -> [Help 1] {code} on about 10 occasions. This seems to be consistent with the Surefire bug, which happens when a test that writes enough to output to have Surefire switch to a buffer file then tries writing to stdout during @AfterClass. The other thing that makes me suspect this is related to the switch of plugins is that the JIRA notes that "In case of reuseForks=true and forkCount>1, this would even result in a hanging maven process"; secondPartTestsExecution runs with forks reusing JVMs and with a fork count of 2, and that's always when Maven dies. Could someone with Jenkins privileges on builds.apache.org perhaps add {{-e}} to the Maven command being executed so that we can see a full stack trace if/when this happens again? That'll give us the definitive answer as to whether this is [SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091] or not. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14175960#comment-14175960 ] Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-12285: - surefire-1091 is a very good suspect, because in our private surefire version the implementation for this was different. This said, my be we just log too much in the test(s)? I've done some cleanup there nearly 3 years ago, but this belongs to the "never ending story" category... > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14175981#comment-14175981 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- Nice digging [~dimaspivak] We could back it out. What about trunk? It is on on trunk? Could we try some [~nkeywal] suggestion too? > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14176407#comment-14176407 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - [It is also on trunk|https://github.com/apache/hbase/commit/018bbc09931d45afa349a76fcc72283013e1d3a2], but as [~nkeywal] pointed out, it may not be failing there if that test output is a bit less verbose. I'll file a separate issue to address the log too much phenomenon, but we may want to back out HBASE-4955 temporarily to get the build on branch-1 to stop failing. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14176981#comment-14176981 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- I like [~eclark] suggestion of just setting log level down globally. Could commit a fix w/ that to see if it changes fail rate np. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14177334#comment-14177334 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-12285: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12675874/HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch against trunk revision . ATTACHMENT ID: 12675874 {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of checkstyle errors {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100 {color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch. {color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests: {color:red}-1 core zombie tests{color}. There are 1 zombie test(s): at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.TestBaseLoadBalancer.testImmediateAssignment(TestBaseLoadBalancer.java:136) Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-rest.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-annotations.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11405//console This message is automatically generated. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14178414#comment-14178414 ] Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-12285: - I think changing the log level is not a good idea (I added a comment in the related jira: it's very common to discover NPE when you activate logs, and it's a very bad user experience: something does not work as expected, you activate the debug logs to understand and then you get a NPE.). If we don't want to pay the testing cost of the debug logs, then I'm +1 for removing them (seriously: they are becoming useless as we now run info by default). But if we keep them in the code we must keep them in the tests. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14178471#comment-14178471 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- You have a point [~nkeywal] The idea here is to change log level to see if profuse logging is breaking surefire. Mind if we try the [~dimaspivak] change a while or you thinking we should just go through tests to find the ones that are logging a bunch and do some weeding? > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14179414#comment-14179414 ] Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-12285: - Sure we can try. But when will we go back to the "good" setting? > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14179581#comment-14179581 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- bq. But when will we go back to the "good" setting? I'll file a BLOCKER so we go back to DEBUG before we ship 1.0 at a minimum. Would like to see if log volume is our prob. I'll make default INFO rather than WARN in light of your above [~nkeywal] > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14179584#comment-14179584 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- Ok. This issue is a BLOCKER already. I've applied [~dimaspivak]'s patch to branch-1+ except made default INFO. Lets see how we run over next few days then regroup on this issue. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14179586#comment-14179586 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - Thanks, [~stack]. I'll monitor the overnight builds and post an update here in the morning. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14179635#comment-14179635 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-12285: FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #5685 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/5685/]) HBASE-12285 Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 (stack: rev f6de7efb27f1f85c5a3b80a182d844a945ffc153) * hbase-server/src/test/resources/log4j.properties > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14179653#comment-14179653 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-12285: FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-1.0 #341 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.0/341/]) HBASE-12285 Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 (stack: rev a5bb441d452088865d9f5038dfb06d6499e8a217) * hbase-server/src/test/resources/log4j.properties > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14180516#comment-14180516 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - Unfortunately, switching logging down to INFO didn't help any of the builds go blue. Should we temporarily set it to WARN as in the original patch and, if that helps things, revert HBASE-4955 while I clean up the loud tests? The 5 days of all-red runs makes me sad. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14180518#comment-14180518 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - Or another thought... what if we set this Jenkins job to not reuse forks between test classes? On my own test rig, I've set this to false to reduce potential cross-test interference and my builds haven't failed even after HBASE-4955 went in. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14181622#comment-14181622 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- [~dimaspivak] Am game for trying any experiment you want. Make a patch for the no reuse and I'll shove it in along w/ WARN to see if it helps. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14181626#comment-14181626 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - The reuseForks=false could just be set in the mvn command line in the branch-1 Jenkins job. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14181669#comment-14181669 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- Done. Made it this in the branch-1 build: -PrunAllTests -DreuseForks=false -Dmaven.test.redirectTestOutputToFile=true install -Dsurefire.secondPartThreadCount=2 -Dit.test=noItTest Why trunk mostly pass and branch-1 does not? Surefire is same for both? Let this run a while (I started a build). Will put in the WARN later after this change has baked a while. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14181712#comment-14181712 ] Elliott Clark commented on HBASE-12285: --- Do we know anyone in the surefire community? At FB we're running the snapshot version of surefire and it's fixed everything for us. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14183008#comment-14183008 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- [~dimaspivak] I just committed change that sets logging to WARN to see if it makes a difference. [~eclark] You think we should move to snapshot of surefilre -- like we did in old days? > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14183021#comment-14183021 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- [[~dimaspivak] Why branch-1 fail but trunk usually passes when both using same surefire do you think? > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14183129#comment-14183129 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-12285: SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.0 #352 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.0/352/]) HBASE-12285 Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 -- trying WARN level to see if it makes any difference (stack: rev b8ed37b88e515efad2958f9b8d92e93fe6e922ad) * hbase-server/src/test/resources/log4j.properties > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14183202#comment-14183202 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- As [~dimaspivak] noticed, we just had our first blue branch-1 build. Only change is the move to WARN and commit of bulk load Interface patch. Rerunning > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14183564#comment-14183564 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- Since changing to log WARN only, builds passed three times where previous they always failed. See here https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-1.0/ > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14184698#comment-14184698 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- After changing the jenkins config for branch-1 to remove -Dmaven.test.redirectTestOutputToFile=true and stuff continued to pass, I've just set branch-1 back to use DEBUG again from WARN. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14184721#comment-14184721 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-12285: FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-1.0 #364 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.0/364/]) HBASE-12285 Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 -- Setting log level back to DEBUG from WARN (stack: rev 65c60ce873b4216dc2d05c28191e7f1a724de8b5) * hbase-server/src/test/resources/log4j.properties > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14184723#comment-14184723 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - Damn, looks like just removing the output redirection isn't enough ([stream error is back|https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.0/364/console]). Might as well move logging back to WARN, [~stack]. One thing that's a bit strange is that it doesn't seem to be caused by any particular test since the same number of tests completed before the error occurs is constant (3430, as seen [here|https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.0/348/testReport/] and [here|https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.0/347/testReport/]) even though the tests are run in random order. It's also worth pointing out that a large number of tests produce logs over 5 MB (some over 50 MB) even though the test that uncovered SUREFIRE-1091 only had to output 1 MB. And, of course, there's the "why does this only hit branch-1?" question that I can't answer either. I'll keep digging... > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14184793#comment-14184793 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- Ok. I'll set it back. I'll put back toot he record to logs config. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14184794#comment-14184794 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- Set it back. Maybe next up is hosting our own surefilre build but we should spend some time on tests that log 50MB for sure; we will only annoy people logging that much. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14184843#comment-14184843 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-12285: SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.0 #365 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.0/365/]) HBASE-12285 Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 -- Setting log level back to DEBUG TO WARN -- second time (stack: rev 862faca7a4f82e032572f8426851968cf7ba017c) * hbase-server/src/test/resources/log4j.properties > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14185920#comment-14185920 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- Committed the subtask "git commit -a -m "HBASE-12353 Turn down logging on some spewing unit tests (Dima Spivak)"" 9ddb25c Let me see that this tests stay blue then will try setting back to DEBUG on branch-1. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14186039#comment-14186039 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-12285: --- {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12677415/HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch against trunk revision . ATTACHMENT ID: 12677415 {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 28 new or modified tests. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of checkstyle errors {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100 {color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch. {color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in . Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-rest.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-annotations.html Checkstyle Errors: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11482//console This message is automatically generated. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14187509#comment-14187509 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- HBASE-12355 includes upping our SUREFIRE to 2.18-SNAPSHOT (as per [~eclark]) suggestion. Will see if it goes in. [~dimaspivak] has been watching the branch-1 builds with help from Apache INFRA/BUILDS (Andrew Bayer). H11 is sick and we sometimes land on an underpowered machine. Set jenkins to avoid these machines for now. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14188697#comment-14188697 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- I set branch-1 and master back to DEBUG level logging (master was on INFO, branch-1 was on WARN-only). branch-1 has been blue overnight with a legit failure on occasion. Thought is that the HBASE-12353 which got rid of a bunch of spew fixes the branch-1 issue. Lets see. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14188825#comment-14188825 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-12285: SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #5716 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/5716/]) HBASE-12285 Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 ; ADDENDUM SETTING LOG LEVEL TO DEBUG AGAIN (stack: rev b240b00f4f751944869511756a3b739040769acb) * hbase-server/src/test/resources/log4j.properties > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14188893#comment-14188893 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - A build of HBase-1.0 [just passed|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.0/380] (log level on branch-1 is back at DEBUG and the log-spew reduction from HBASE-12293 was present), so I think this is probably safe to resolve as fixed. What do you think, [~stack]? Since this is no longer blocking builds, we may want to hold off updating Surefire until 2.18 is officially released. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14188897#comment-14188897 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-12285: SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.0 #380 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.0/380/]) HBASE-12285 Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 ; ADDENDUM SETTING LOG LEVEL TO DEBUG AGAIN (stack: rev 752c5460999ed474d45a7032b3ed986e7aa6749d) * hbase-server/src/test/resources/log4j.properties > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14189147#comment-14189147 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- Ok. You spoke too soon [~dimaspivak] (smile). Last two builds on branch-1 failed w/ your favorite: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.17:test (secondPartTestsExecution) on project hbase-server: ExecutionException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.IOException: Stream Closed -> [Help 1] Let me try putting in place 2.18-SNAPSHOT as subtask of this issue. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14189537#comment-14189537 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - In first run (after addendum) with 2.18-SNAPSHOT, we get {code} Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.18-SNAPSHOT:test (secondPartTestsExecution) on project hbase-server: ExecutionException: java.lang.RuntimeException: The forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye. VM crash or System.exit called? [ERROR] Command was /bin/sh -c cd /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/HBase-1.0/hbase-server && /home/jenkins/tools/java/jdk1.7.0_25-32/jre/bin/java -enableassertions -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=1G -Xmx1900m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Djava.awt.headless=true -jar /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/HBase-1.0/hbase-server/target/surefire/surefirebooter8771725147211915636.jar /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/HBase-1.0/hbase-server/target/surefire/surefire4600209770137145770tmp /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/HBase-1.0/hbase-server/target/surefire/surefire_7296048355863863584558tmp {code} Let's let it run a handful more times and then reevaluate what's going on here. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14190919#comment-14190919 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- What you think [~dimaspivak]? I'm thinking we resolved as fixed by the linked too much logging fix you did and the update to surefire 2.18-SNAPSHOT. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14190928#comment-14190928 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12285: - Sounds good, [~stack]. It looks good except for a {code} [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.18-SNAPSHOT:test (secondPartTestsExecution) on project hbase-server: There was a timeout or other error in the fork -> [Help 1] {code} that happened a little while back, but I'll go ahead and close this since I think the SUREFIRE-1091 bug is no longer the problem. > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 1.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12285) Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14193670#comment-14193670 ] stack commented on HBASE-12285: --- [~dimaspivak] Open a new issue instead? The surefire snapshot and the culling of the logs put us in a better place for sure. We have mostly blues now when we build. We've been failing since #400 because of HBASE-12219. Was this causing the " There was a timeout or other error in the fork" Good on you Dima > Builds are failing, possibly because of SUREFIRE-1091 > - > > Key: HBASE-12285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12285 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Dima Spivak >Assignee: Dima Spivak >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.99.2 > > Attachments: HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch, > HBASE-12285_branch-1_v1.patch > > > Our branch-1 builds on builds.apache.org have been failing in recent days > after we switched over to an official version of Surefire a few days back > (HBASE-4955). The version we're using, 2.17, is hit by a bug > ([SUREFIRE-1091|https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1091]) that results > in an IOException, which looks like what we're seeing on Jenkins. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)