[jira] Created: (MASSEMBLY-539) Link to Assembly Descriptor Schemas (XSD) for 1.1.2 is broken

2011-01-12 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)
Link to Assembly Descriptor Schemas (XSD) for 1.1.2 is broken
-

 Key: MASSEMBLY-539
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-539
 Project: Maven 2.x Assembly Plugin
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Eric Lewis
Priority: Minor


At the bottom of http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/ there 
are links to the XSD files.

The one for 1.1.2 points to
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/assembly-1.1.1.xsd
but should point to
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/assembly-1.1.2.xsd

Also, http://maven.apache.org/xsd/assembly-1.1.2.xsd is delivered as MIME type 
text/html instead of text/plain

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Created: (SUREFIRE-636) Wrong plugin parameter documentation for includes and excludes

2010-08-11 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)
Wrong plugin parameter documentation for includes and excludes
--

 Key: SUREFIRE-636
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-636
 Project: Maven Surefire
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Maven Surefire Plugin
Reporter: Eric Lewis
Priority: Minor


The documentation for the plugin parameters includes 
(http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html#includes) 
and excludes 
(http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html#excludes) 
states that it expects a List of patterns (separated by commas) used to 
specify the tests that should be included/excluded in testing.

However, that's not the case, as shown in
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/inclusion-exclusion.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Created: (MASSEMBLY-447) Redefined scope is ignored for dependencies

2009-10-13 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)
Redefined scope is ignored for dependencies
---

 Key: MASSEMBLY-447
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-447
 Project: Maven 2.x Assembly Plugin
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.2-beta-4
Reporter: Eric Lewis


I have a dependency which is defined with scopetest/scope.

In another project, however, it is redefined to scoperuntime/scope.

Now, when I get the runtime dependencies with

dependencySet
  useStrictFilteringtrue/useStrictFiltering
  useProjectArtifactfalse/useProjectArtifact
  scoperuntime/scope
  !-- Don't distribute sources --
  excludes
exclude*:sources/exclude
  /excludes
/dependencySet

the dependency is not included.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Created: (MINSTALL-70) install-file should take the version from the parent if the version for the artifact is missing in the POM

2009-09-16 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)
install-file should take the version from the parent if the version for the 
artifact is missing in the POM
--

 Key: MINSTALL-70
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINSTALL-70
 Project: Maven 2.x Install Plugin
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: install:install-file
Affects Versions: 2.3
Reporter: Eric Lewis


Spring Source seems to release POM which have no version. According to the 
Maven philosophy this means that they inherit their parent's version.

However, if I try
{{mvn install:install-file -Dfile=spring-ldap-core-1.3.0.RELEASE.jar 
-DpomFile=pom.xml}}

I get

{quote}
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO] Searching repository for plugin with prefix: 'install'.
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Spring LDAP Core
[INFO]task-segment: [install:install-file] (aggregator-style)
[INFO] 
[INFO] [install:install-file {execution: default-cli}]
[INFO] 
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO] 
[INFO] An invalid artifact was detected.

This artifact might be in your project's POM, or it might have been included 
transitively during the resolution process. Here is the information we do have 
for this artifact:

o GroupID: org.springframework.ldap
o ArtifactID:  spring-ldap-core
o Version:  MISSING 
o Type:pom

[INFO] 
[INFO] Trace
org.apache.maven.artifact.InvalidArtifactRTException: For artifact 
{org.springframework.ldap:spring-ldap-core:null:pom}: The version cannot be 
empty.
{quote}

The POM looks like this:
{quote}
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
project
xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 
http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd;

parent
groupIdorg.springframework.ldap/groupId
artifactIdspring-ldap-parent/artifactId
version1.3.0.RELEASE/version
/parent
modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
artifactIdspring-ldap-core/artifactId
packagingjar/packaging
nameSpring LDAP Core/name

build
...
{quote}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Commented: (MINSTALL-70) install-file should take the version from the parent if the version for the artifact is missing in the POM

2009-09-16 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)

[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINSTALL-70?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=191170#action_191170
 ] 

Eric Lewis commented on MINSTALL-70:


Here's the output from {{mvn:help effective-pom}}

$ mvn help:effective-pom
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO] Searching repository for plugin with prefix: 'help'.
[INFO] artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-help-plugin: checking for 
updates from Codehaus
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Spring LDAP Core
[INFO]task-segment: [help:effective-pom] (aggregator-style)
[INFO] 
[INFO] [help:effective-pom {execution: default-cli}]
[INFO] 
Effective POMs, after inheritance, interpolation, and profiles are applied:

?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!-- == --
!----
!-- Generated by Maven Help Plugin on 9/16/09 5:04 PM  --
!-- See: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-help-plugin/--
!----
!-- == --

!-- == --
!----
!-- Effective POM for project  --
!-- 'org.springframework.ldap:spring-ldap-core:jar:1.3.0.RELEASE'  --
!----
!-- == --

project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; 
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; 
xsi:schemaLocation=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd;
  modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
  parent
artifactIdspring-ldap-parent/artifactId
groupIdorg.springframework.ldap/groupId
version1.3.0.RELEASE/version
  /parent
  groupIdorg.springframework.ldap/groupId
  artifactIdspring-ldap-core/artifactId
  version1.3.0.RELEASE/version
  nameSpring LDAP Core/name
  scm
...

 install-file should take the version from the parent if the version for the 
 artifact is missing in the POM
 --

 Key: MINSTALL-70
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINSTALL-70
 Project: Maven 2.x Install Plugin
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: install:install-file
Affects Versions: 2.3
Reporter: Eric Lewis

 Spring Source seems to release POM which have no version. According to the 
 Maven philosophy this means that they inherit their parent's version.
 However, if I try
 {{mvn install:install-file -Dfile=spring-ldap-core-1.3.0.RELEASE.jar 
 -DpomFile=pom.xml}}
 I get
 {quote}
 [INFO] Scanning for projects...
 [INFO] Searching repository for plugin with prefix: 'install'.
 [INFO] 
 
 [INFO] Building Spring LDAP Core
 [INFO]task-segment: [install:install-file] (aggregator-style)
 [INFO] 
 
 [INFO] [install:install-file {execution: default-cli}]
 [INFO] 
 
 [ERROR] FATAL ERROR
 [INFO] 
 
 [INFO] An invalid artifact was detected.
 This artifact might be in your project's POM, or it might have been included 
 transitively during the resolution process. Here is the information we do 
 have for this artifact:
 o GroupID: org.springframework.ldap
 o ArtifactID:  spring-ldap-core
 o Version:  MISSING 
 o Type:pom
 [INFO] 
 
 [INFO] Trace
 org.apache.maven.artifact.InvalidArtifactRTException: For artifact 
 {org.springframework.ldap:spring-ldap-core:null:pom}: The version cannot be 
 empty.
 {quote}
 The POM looks like this:
 {quote}
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
 project
 xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
 xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
 xsi:schemaLocation=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 
 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd;
 parent
 groupIdorg.springframework.ldap/groupId
 artifactIdspring-ldap-parent/artifactId
 version1.3.0.RELEASE/version
 /parent
 modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
 artifactIdspring-ldap-core/artifactId
  

[jira] Closed: (MINSTALL-70) install-file should take the version from the parent if the version for the artifact is missing in the POM

2009-09-16 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)

 [ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINSTALL-70?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Eric Lewis closed MINSTALL-70.
--

   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.3

Sorry for that! I was using 2.2 without knowing.

 install-file should take the version from the parent if the version for the 
 artifact is missing in the POM
 --

 Key: MINSTALL-70
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINSTALL-70
 Project: Maven 2.x Install Plugin
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: install:install-file
Affects Versions: 2.3
Reporter: Eric Lewis
 Fix For: 2.3


 Spring Source seems to release POM which have no version. According to the 
 Maven philosophy this means that they inherit their parent's version.
 However, if I try
 {{mvn install:install-file -Dfile=spring-ldap-core-1.3.0.RELEASE.jar 
 -DpomFile=pom.xml}}
 I get
 {quote}
 [INFO] Scanning for projects...
 [INFO] Searching repository for plugin with prefix: 'install'.
 [INFO] 
 
 [INFO] Building Spring LDAP Core
 [INFO]task-segment: [install:install-file] (aggregator-style)
 [INFO] 
 
 [INFO] [install:install-file {execution: default-cli}]
 [INFO] 
 
 [ERROR] FATAL ERROR
 [INFO] 
 
 [INFO] An invalid artifact was detected.
 This artifact might be in your project's POM, or it might have been included 
 transitively during the resolution process. Here is the information we do 
 have for this artifact:
 o GroupID: org.springframework.ldap
 o ArtifactID:  spring-ldap-core
 o Version:  MISSING 
 o Type:pom
 [INFO] 
 
 [INFO] Trace
 org.apache.maven.artifact.InvalidArtifactRTException: For artifact 
 {org.springframework.ldap:spring-ldap-core:null:pom}: The version cannot be 
 empty.
 {quote}
 The POM looks like this:
 {quote}
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
 project
 xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
 xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
 xsi:schemaLocation=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 
 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd;
 parent
 groupIdorg.springframework.ldap/groupId
 artifactIdspring-ldap-parent/artifactId
 version1.3.0.RELEASE/version
 /parent
 modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
 artifactIdspring-ldap-core/artifactId
 packagingjar/packaging
 nameSpring LDAP Core/name
 build
 ...
 {quote}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Created: (MENFORCER-83) Banned dependencies should support regular expressions

2009-08-19 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)
Banned dependencies should support regular expressions
--

 Key: MENFORCER-83
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-83
 Project: Maven 2.x Enforcer Plugin
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Standard Rules
Affects Versions: 1.0-beta-1
Reporter: Eric Lewis


The includes and excludes of the bannedDependencies rule support wildcards, but 
only for an entire section.

They should be enhanced to support regular expressions.

For instance instead of having
includes
  includemy.company:abc-api/include
  includemy.company:def-api/include
  includemy.company:ghi-api/include
  includemy.company:jkl-api/include
/includes

one would specify

includes
  includemy.company:.*\-api/include
/includes

To be compatible, the wildcard '*' would be treated as regular expression '.*'

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Commented: (MENFORCER-83) Banned dependencies should support regular expressions

2009-08-19 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)

[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=187572#action_187572
 ] 

Eric Lewis commented on MENFORCER-83:
-

Sorry, I wasn't aware of the syntax in JIRA.

The last sentence should read

To be compatible, the wildcard * would be treated as regular expression .*

 Banned dependencies should support regular expressions
 --

 Key: MENFORCER-83
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-83
 Project: Maven 2.x Enforcer Plugin
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Standard Rules
Affects Versions: 1.0-beta-1
Reporter: Eric Lewis

 The includes and excludes of the bannedDependencies rule support wildcards, 
 but only for an entire section.
 They should be enhanced to support regular expressions.
 For instance instead of having
 includes
   includemy.company:abc-api/include
   includemy.company:def-api/include
   includemy.company:ghi-api/include
   includemy.company:jkl-api/include
 /includes
 one would specify
 includes
   includemy.company:.*\-api/include
 /includes
 To be compatible, the wildcard '*' would be treated as regular expression '.*'

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Created: (MSITE-389) Maven's CSS shows ugly green shadows

2009-03-10 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)
Maven's CSS shows ugly green shadows


 Key: MSITE-389
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-389
 Project: Maven 2.x Site Plugin
  Issue Type: Improvement
 Environment: Windows, the shadows are not shown on Firefox  3.1, but 
on 3.1 they are shown. Also, doesn't appear on my IE 7
Reporter: Eric Lewis
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: uglyGreenShadows.png

The maven-base.css contains text shadowing for the banner
text-shadow: #7CFC00 1px 1px 1px;

This has problably not been reported before, because it's only shown in Firefox 
3.1.

However, it looks terrible, so please remove it.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Commented: (MSITE-389) Maven's CSS shows ugly green shadows

2009-03-10 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)

[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=168766#action_168766
 ] 

Eric Lewis commented on MSITE-389:
--

I'm using Maven 2.0.9, so according to its release notes, it's 2.0-beta-6.

 Maven's CSS shows ugly green shadows
 

 Key: MSITE-389
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-389
 Project: Maven 2.x Site Plugin
  Issue Type: Improvement
 Environment: Windows, the shadows are not shown on Firefox  3.1, but 
 on 3.1 they are shown. Also, doesn't appear on my IE 7
Reporter: Eric Lewis
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: uglyGreenShadows.png


 The maven-base.css contains text shadowing for the banner
 text-shadow: #7CFC00 1px 1px 1px;
 This has problably not been reported before, because it's only shown in 
 Firefox 3.1.
 However, it looks terrible, so please remove it.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Closed: (MSITE-389) Maven's CSS shows ugly green shadows

2009-03-10 Thread Eric Lewis (JIRA)

 [ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Eric Lewis closed MSITE-389.


Resolution: Fixed

Ok, I just tested it on 2.0-beta-7, the text-shadow is gone.

Thanks!

 Maven's CSS shows ugly green shadows
 

 Key: MSITE-389
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-389
 Project: Maven 2.x Site Plugin
  Issue Type: Improvement
 Environment: Windows, the shadows are not shown on Firefox  3.1, but 
 on 3.1 they are shown. Also, doesn't appear on my IE 7
Reporter: Eric Lewis
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: uglyGreenShadows.png


 The maven-base.css contains text shadowing for the banner
 text-shadow: #7CFC00 1px 1px 1px;
 This has problably not been reported before, because it's only shown in 
 Firefox 3.1.
 However, it looks terrible, so please remove it.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira