[GitHub] nifi pull request #2979: [WIP] An experiment that I am looking at to elimina...

2018-09-27 Thread markap14
Github user markap14 closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2979


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2979: [WIP] An experiment that I am looking at to elimina...

2018-08-30 Thread markap14
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2979

[WIP] An experiment that I am looking at to eliminate what appears to be 
unneeded synchronization in the WriteAheadProvenanceRepository. Not ready to be 
merged to master yet.

…. Also, unclear if the addEvents(Iterable) is the 
big difference maker or if it's the change to tryLease, etc.

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

### For all changes:
- [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
 in the commit message?

- [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI- where  is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.

- [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?

- [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

### For code changes:
- [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
- [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
- [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
- [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?

### For documentation related changes:
- [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?

### Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/markap14/nifi prov-experiment

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2979.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2979


commit 19d68cee3c4ecc01a4b54eba151d6471c392e45d
Author: Mark Payne 
Date:   2018-08-28T16:45:03Z

Checkpoint. Code is a little hacky and needs to be tested much better. 
Also, unclear if the addEvents(Iterable) is the big 
difference maker or if it's the change to tryLease, etc.




---