[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-808) bufferDeleteTerm in IndexWriter might flush prematurely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-808: --- Priority: Minor (was: Major) > bufferDeleteTerm in IndexWriter might flush prematurely > --- > > Key: LUCENE-808 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-808 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Index >Affects Versions: 2.1 >Reporter: Doron Cohen >Assignee: Doron Cohen >Priority: Minor > Attachments: successive_bufferDeleteTerm.patch > > > Successive calls to remove-by-the-same-term would increment > numBufferedDeleteTerms > although all but the first are no op if no docs were added in between. Hence > deletes would > be flushed too soon. > It is a minor problem, should be rare, but it seems cleaner to fix this. > Attached patch also fixes TestIndexWriterDelete.testNonRAMDelete() which > somehow > relied on this behavior. All tests pass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-808) bufferDeleteTerm in IndexWriter might flush prematurely
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-808: --- Attachment: successive_bufferDeleteTerm.patch > bufferDeleteTerm in IndexWriter might flush prematurely > --- > > Key: LUCENE-808 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-808 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Index >Affects Versions: 2.1 >Reporter: Doron Cohen > Attachments: successive_bufferDeleteTerm.patch > > > Successive calls to remove-by-the-same-term would increment > numBufferedDeleteTerms > although all but the first are no op if no docs were added in between. Hence > deletes would > be flushed too soon. > It is a minor problem, should be rare, but it seems cleaner to fix this. > Attached patch also fixes TestIndexWriterDelete.testNonRAMDelete() which > somehow > relied on this behavior. All tests pass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
