[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Search Engines and Seam
I don't think thats a relevant scoring factor anymore. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054409#4054409 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4054409 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Search Engines and Seam
I created a website with the .seam extension but found that although my site was indexed by Google and Yahoo, it was not cached. I changed the extension for seam pages to .html and then Google and Yahoo no longer indexed the site at all. Because the jsf components render xhtml elements I think maybe the engines are unhappy with the use of the .html extension (although MSN works fine). At the moment I'm going back to the .seam extension. Please share your experiences and insights in this regard. Thank you. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054419#4054419 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4054419 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Search Engines and Seam
trickyvail wrote : Because the jsf components render xhtml elements I think maybe the engines are unhappy with the use of the .html extension (although MSN works fine). That's probably not a concern. Just use .html or .xhtml extension as you like and specify the correct DOCTYPE. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054424#4054424 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4054424 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Search Engines and Seam
I would be very very surprised if caching is dependent on some string in the URL. It should only depend on the HTTP headers and DOCTYPE. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054464#4054464 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4054464 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Search Engines and Seam
Does this sound like a plausible explanation for the search engine behavior? Seam-gen creates an index.html page that contains: html | head | meta http-equiv=Refresh content=0; URL=home.seam | /head | /html Search engine retrieves this page, caches it and then proceeds to index and cache the home.seam page. The root page for your domain ends up being a blank page. Possible solution? Edit server/default/deploy/jbossweb-tomcat55.sar/conf/web.xml welcome-file-list | welcome-filehome.seam/welcome-file |/welcome-file-list View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054471#4054471 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4054471 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Search Engines and Seam
I've tried the above with both home.seam and home.xhtml as the target welcome page but with no success. Maybe because the server tries to access the file directly rather than letting seam intercept the file by extension? Solution attempt 2 - create a robots.txt file that directs the search engines to the correct root page for the site (home.seam). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054487#4054487 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4054487 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Search Engines and Seam
Previously I stated that search engines were not caching pages, but it would be more accurate to state that they were caching blank pages (sorry for the imprecision). It seems that robots.txt can only be used to define areas to not visit, so that won't work either. Currently I'm thinking about the following approach: html | head | meta http-equiv=Refresh content=0; URL=home.seam | meta name=robots content=noindex,follow | /head | /html(Tell the search engine to follow the redirecting index.html page, but not to index it.) Ideally though, I would like to have JBoss load my home.seam page by default, rather than load an index.html page with a redirect. Is this something that is possible and how do you configure JBoss to do this? Thank you for everyone's help. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054498#4054498 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4054498 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Search Engines and Seam
If home.seam worked in the welcome file list, then the server would essentially be restarting the request, since at that point you've already passed the URI parsing facility of the server. The welcome file list can't be anything that requires a request URI mapping in web.xml. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054506#4054506 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4054506 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
