AW: [JBoss-user] Benchmark results JBoss/BEA Async Performance
Sorry, I havent got the time for that anymore. But please let me know of any improvements - I would love to use JBoss instead. Bye, Jubin > -Ursprungliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Mai 2001 23:03 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [JBoss-user] Benchmark results JBoss/BEA Async Performance > > > On 26 Maj, Jubin Zawar wrote: > > Hi people, > > > > > Hi, interesting, but not joyable, results. My guess is that it is not > the MDB per se that is causing the problem, but JBossMQ. Have you any > possibilities to test the same scenario without using MDB (use normal > client subscribers) and see if the results are the same.? > > JBossMQ is discussed on a separate mailinglist. I will respost your > results there. > > //Peter > > here are results for the messaging benchmarks, for BEA and JBoss. > > First, a little description of the scenario. > > > > > -- > > -- > > We decided for this simple scenario to benchmark : > > > > PostingClient posts to Topic1. > > MDB1 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic1, gets the > message, puts > > its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic2. > > MDB2 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic2, gets the > message, puts > > its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic3. > > MDB3 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic2, gets the > message, puts > > its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic4. > > MDB4 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic2, gets the > message, puts > > its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic1. > > and when the message is posted to topic1, MDB1 regets the message. > > There is another listener on topic1 --> MonitoringClient. > > MonitoringClient gets the messages arriving there, and reports > the times > > the > > message took between the 4 MDBs. > > > > Summary : the messages sent into the EJB Server remain in > there, and make > > loops from MDB1 to MDB4 and back again, endlessly. > > > > Hardware : Pentium II, 400 Mhz, 256 Megs of RAM. > > OS : Windows NT4 > > VM : Sun 1.3 > > > > > -- > > - > > --- > > Benchmark Testing Series : > > > > > > Weblogic Benchmarks: > > VM : 64MB heapsize. > > Configurations : > > 1) max-beans-in-free-pool : 50 > initial-beans-in-free-pool : 6 (in > > the > > entries in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml, for each of the 4 message beans) > > 2) max-beans-in-free-pool : 500initial-beans-in-free-pool : 62 > > 3) max-beans-in-free-pool : 2000 initial-beans-in-free-pool : 250 > > > > for each configuration we tested (with 1 KB messagesize): > > 50 msgs, 500 msgs, 5000msgs, and infinite (until server crash - maximum > > time > > waiting for crash 30 minutess) > > > > On JBoss : > > VM: 64MB heapsize. > > Configurations: > > (in jboss.xml) > > 1) container-invoker : maximumsize 50,maxmessages 1 - container-pool: > > maximumsize 50 minimumsize 6 > > 2) container-invoker : maximumsize 500,maxmessages 1 - container-pool: > > maximumsize 500 minimumsize 62 > > 3) the maximum jboss could handle even with 128mb ram for the > heapsize of > > the VM was : > > container-invoker : maximumsize 500,maxmessages 1 - container-pool: > > maximumsize 500 minimumsize 100 > > > > for each configuration we tested (with 1 KB messagesize): > > 50 msgs, 500 msgs, 5000msgs, and infinite (until server crash - maximum > > time > > waiting for crash 30 minutes) > > > -- > > -- > > - > > > > Results for Weblogic : > > this server is very fast and stable. With 5000 Messages, we > had a crash at > > configuration 1, at 1800 Messages sent. > > With configuration 2, it crashed at 3300, and with > configuration 3 we had > > a > > crash as early as with 500 messages - but that was due to the > low heapsize > > of the VM. > > When we raised the heapsize to 128Megs, the server ran good with 1 > > messages. > > Sending times : we mesaured the times needed for a message to be sent > > between to consecutive MDBs - for weblogic
[JBoss-user] Benchmark results JBoss/BEA Async Performance
Hi people, here are results for the messaging benchmarks, for BEA and JBoss. First, a little description of the scenario. -- -- We decided for this simple scenario to benchmark : PostingClient posts to Topic1. MDB1 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic1, gets the message, puts its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic2. MDB2 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic2, gets the message, puts its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic3. MDB3 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic2, gets the message, puts its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic4. MDB4 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic2, gets the message, puts its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic1. and when the message is posted to topic1, MDB1 regets the message. There is another listener on topic1 --> MonitoringClient. MonitoringClient gets the messages arriving there, and reports the times the message took between the 4 MDBs. Summary : the messages sent into the EJB Server remain in there, and make loops from MDB1 to MDB4 and back again, endlessly. Hardware : Pentium II, 400 Mhz, 256 Megs of RAM. OS : Windows NT4 VM : Sun 1.3 -- - --- Benchmark Testing Series : Weblogic Benchmarks: VM : 64MB heapsize. Configurations : 1) max-beans-in-free-pool : 50initial-beans-in-free-pool : 6 (in the entries in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml, for each of the 4 message beans) 2) max-beans-in-free-pool : 500initial-beans-in-free-pool : 62 3) max-beans-in-free-pool : 2000 initial-beans-in-free-pool : 250 for each configuration we tested (with 1 KB messagesize): 50 msgs, 500 msgs, 5000msgs, and infinite (until server crash - maximum time waiting for crash 30 minutess) On JBoss : VM: 64MB heapsize. Configurations: (in jboss.xml) 1) container-invoker : maximumsize 50,maxmessages 1 - container-pool: maximumsize 50 minimumsize 6 2) container-invoker : maximumsize 500,maxmessages 1 - container-pool: maximumsize 500 minimumsize 62 3) the maximum jboss could handle even with 128mb ram for the heapsize of the VM was : container-invoker : maximumsize 500,maxmessages 1 - container-pool: maximumsize 500 minimumsize 100 for each configuration we tested (with 1 KB messagesize): 50 msgs, 500 msgs, 5000msgs, and infinite (until server crash - maximum time waiting for crash 30 minutes) -- -- - Results for Weblogic : this server is very fast and stable. With 5000 Messages, we had a crash at configuration 1, at 1800 Messages sent. With configuration 2, it crashed at 3300, and with configuration 3 we had a crash as early as with 500 messages - but that was due to the low heapsize of the VM. When we raised the heapsize to 128Megs, the server ran good with 1 messages. Sending times : we mesaured the times needed for a message to be sent between to consecutive MDBs - for weblogic it was all around 0,1 secs. At 1 messages, average sending time was 1,4 seconds. For 5000 messages, even with config 3, we had 0,8 seconds. All other results were very acceptable, average times of 0.01 to 0.2. If you need any more details, contact me. JBoss : config 3,2 : 3 seconds average with 50 messages. Well, to be very honest : perhaps I m doing something fundamentally wrong, and I dont know exactly what strategy JBoss is pursuing in its kind of message delivery, but JBoss crashed at every config with 500 messages. Average sending times at 50 messages were 3 seconds, regardless of the configuration used, the parameters showed little or no effect. I know that these parameters should tune throughput, I know, and I know that with 4 topics and 4 MDBs, we are not simulating a true asynchrnously designed application, meaning : with asynchronous components only. But regardless of the throughput, no one wants to wait 12 seconds for a response. Even with 30 messages in the system, the average was 2 seconds, meaning 8 seconds in total to wait for a response : and this with only 4 asynchronous components. At 10 messages, we got average times of 0,7 seconds - meaning a response time of 3 seconds in total, which could be acceptable. It is also strange that weblogic showed significant CPU usage when increasing the JMS load, while JBoss stayed very happy with around 10%, not caring about any optimization in speed, it seems. Have we forgotten any parameters to SPEED up sending times, message delivery, or MDB invocation for JBoss ? I am really wondering. For precise details, contact me. Best regards, Jubin Zawar ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EM
AW: [JBoss-user] Benchmarking Messaging in JBoss
Hi Peter, we posted the results yesterday (see posting by [EMAIL PROTECTED], Subject : "Benchmark results for MDBs"). What benchmark are you referring to (progress ?), and where can I find infos about it ? Best regards, Jubin Zawar > -Ursprungliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Mai 2001 22:02 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [JBoss-user] Benchmarking Messaging in JBoss > > > On 15 Maj, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > hi list ! > > > > we are going to benchmark jboss for messaging. > > > > Great, and you will post the results I guess! > > Have you looked into the little benchmarking application done by > progress (soniqmq, maybe you could use something from there)? > > //Peter > > scenario is the following : > > > > PostingClient thread posts messages to Topic 1, with a key as > identifier and some junk data variable in size (Testing Parameter 1). > > Messagedriven Bean 1 listens on topic 1, writes the current > time to "lastTimeReceivedMDB1" in the message, increases the > "howManyTimesSent" counter and posts it to topic 2. > > > > Messagedriven Bean 2 listens on topic 2, writes the current > time to "lastTimeReceivedMDB2" in the message and posts it to topic 1. > > > > MonitoringClient thread listens on topic 1. > > > > MDB1, also listening on topic 1, will recapture the message and > then increase counter, write time, and post it to topic 2, etc. etc. > > > > PostingClient will continuously bring new messages to the system. > > > > MonitoringClient has facilities for identifying the messages in > topic 1 and will care about : > > > > - time difference between MDB1 and MDB2 > > > > and other parameters. > > > > We are probably going to benchmark weblogic's newest app server > version as well. > > > > Best regards, jubin > > > > > > > > ___ > > JBoss-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > -- > > Peter Antman Technology in Media, Box 34105 100 26 Stockholm > Systems ArchitectWWW: http://www.tim.se > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]WWW: http://www.backsource.org > Phone: +46-(0)8-506 381 11 Mobile: 070-675 3942 > > > > ___ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] message driven beans like in ejb 2.0 ?
are there message driven beans in jboss yet, as in ejb2.0 ? > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von James Cook > Gesendet: Montag, 09. April 2001 20:52 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [JBoss-user] Status ? > > > In order to support EJB 2.0, there has to be a 2.0 version of the spec!!! > > There is only draft versions out so far, and some changes in > direction regarding > dependent object support is still possible. > > jim > > - Original Message - > From: "Jubin Zawar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:16 PM > Subject: [JBoss-user] Status ? > > > > Hi people, > > > > is jboss already supporting ejb2.0 ? If not, when will that be > the case ? We > > are implementing a project involving message-driven beans and > wanted to know > > if this has already been implemented properly in the jboss > framework. As for > > the new database persistence features, theyre not so important for this > > project. > > > > Anybody knows more ? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Jubin Zawar > > > > > > ___ > > JBoss-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > ___ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] Status ?
Hi people, is jboss already supporting ejb2.0 ? If not, when will that be the case ? We are implementing a project involving message-driven beans and wanted to know if this has already been implemented properly in the jboss framework. As for the new database persistence features, theyre not so important for this project. Anybody knows more ? Best regards, Jubin Zawar ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
