Re: [JBoss-user] Many-to-many relation table is not being updated

2003-03-11 Thread Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka
I've managed to make it work!

I simply moved the code (Collection.add) to a business method INSIDE the
Entity Bean code. I was trying to do this by calling Collection.add from the
Session Bean (facade) using Local references but this doesn't seem to work.

Thanks for your help!

Mauricio


- Original Message -
From: "Marek Lange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Many-to-many relation table is not being updated


> > I tried this but it didn't work... :-(
> > I have tried on JBoss 3.2.0RC2 too, but it didn't work too. I'm stucked
on
> > this for almost 2 weeks by now. :-(
> >
> > If you have any other suggestion or an example of 2 EJB with a
many-to-many
> > relationship between them coded using XDoclet, please send me.
>
> The fact, that you get the correct results if you populate the database
> manually, proofs that the relation is correctly working. So there seems
> to be another reason why the inserts do not work.
>
> Have you set up a 1:n relation before? Does this work? Perhaps there is
> a problem with your database? What are you using?
>
> -marek
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] DynamicQL concurrency problem

2003-03-05 Thread Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka



Hello people!I've been using DynamicQL with 
CMP Entity Beans in JBoss 3.0.6 and it's working quite well, except for a little 
problem. When I've more than one client running a DynamicQL query at the same 
time over the same CMP Entity Bean, sometimes I got the following 
exception:2003-02-20 18:58:29,857 ERROR 
[org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor] TransactionRolledbackLocalException, 
causedBy:java.lang.NullPointerExceptionat 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCAbstractQueryCommand.execute(JDBCAbstractQueryCommand.java:161)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCDynamicQLQuery.execute(JDBCDynamicQLQuery.java:101)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.bridge.JDBCSelectorBridge.execute(JDBCSelectorBridge.java:64)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.bridge.EntityBridgeInvocationHandler.invoke(EntityBridgeInvocationHandler.java:96)at 
org.jboss.proxy.compiler.Runtime.invoke(Runtime.java:59)at 
br.com.smbsoftware.webflow.tc.entity.TaskInfoBean$Proxy.ejbSelectGeneric()at 
br.com.smbsoftware.webflow.tc.entity.TaskInfoBean.ejbHomeSelectGeneric(TaskInfoBean.java:731)at 
sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor436.invoke(Unknown Source)at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)at 
java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)at 
org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer$ContainerInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityContainer.java:1138)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractInterceptor.invokeHome(AbstractInterceptor.java:73)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.invokeHome(EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.java:207)at 
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInterceptor.invokeHome(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:215)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractInterceptor.invokeHome(AbstractInterceptor.java:73)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityInstanceInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityInstanceInterceptor.java:90)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityLockInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityLockInterceptor.java:79)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityCreationInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityCreationInterceptor.java:44)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractTxInterceptor.invokeNext(AbstractTxInterceptor.java:111)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.runWithTransactions(TxInterceptorCMT.java:228)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.invokeHome(TxInterceptorCMT.java:62)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.SecurityInterceptor.invokeHome(SecurityInterceptor.java:105)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor.invokeHome(LogInterceptor.java:129)at 
org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer.invokeHome(EntityContainer.java:487)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.local.BaseLocalContainerInvoker.invokeHome(BaseLocalContainerInvoker.java:230)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.local.LocalHomeProxy.invoke(LocalHomeProxy.java:110)at 
$Proxy198.selectGeneric(Unknown Source)at 
br.com.smbsoftware.webflow.tc.session.TaskControlBean.getTaskInfoId(TaskControlBean.java:932)at 
sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor483.invoke(Unknown Source)at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)at 
java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)at 
org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer$ContainerInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionContainer.java:660)at 
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInterceptor.invoke(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:186)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor.java:77)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractTxInterceptor.invokeNext(AbstractTxInterceptor.java:107)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.runWithTransactions(TxInterceptorCMT.java:228)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.invoke(TxInterceptorCMT.java:92)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:130)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor.invoke(LogInterceptor.java:204)at 
org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer.invoke(StatelessSessionContainer.java:313)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.local.BaseLocalContainerInvoker.invoke(BaseLocalContainerInvoker.java:301)at 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.local.StatelessSessionProxy.invoke(StatelessSessionProxy.java:81)at 
$Proxy208.getTaskInfoId(Unknown Source)at 
br.com.smbsoftware.webflow.tc.TaskControlDelegate.getTaskInfoId(TaskControlDelegate.java:348)at 
br.com.smbsoftware.bombril.struts.SearchTaskAction.execute(SearchTaskAction.java:87)at 
org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processActionPerform(RequestProcessor.java:446)at 
org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:266)at 
org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1292)at 
org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java:510)at 
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)at 
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:360)at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.WebApplicationHandler.dispatch(WebApplicationHandler.java:280)at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:

Re: [JBoss-user] Re: Deadlocks

2003-03-03 Thread Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka
I didn't mean to make the whole bean as read-only, just tell JBoss that get*
methods are read-only.

- Original Message -
From: "Jon Swinth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:14 PM
Subject: [JBoss-user] Re: Deadlocks


> Does this mean that putting the following in the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file
> doesn't make the beans read-only any more?
>
> 
>   CarrierBeanRO
>   carrier
>   true
>   3
> 
>
> On Sunday 02 March 2003 06:35 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > From: "Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Deadlocks
> > Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:00:12 -0300
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > I didn't find any way do detect deadlocks on JBoss but you can change
your
> > jboss.xml to tell JBoss which methods do not need an EJB lock.
> >
> >
> > In each  entry in jboss.xml file, do the following change (in
this
> > example, get* methods are read-only):
> >
> >
> > 
> > Role
> > ejb/webflow/local/Role
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > get*
> > true
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> >
> > I didn't find any XDoclet @tag to do this but I coded a XSLT transform:
> >
> >
> > 
> >  > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";>
> >  
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >  
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >  
> >   
> >
> >
> > 
> >  get*
> >  true
> > 
> >
> >   
> >  
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> > If you are using ant to build your project do something like this:
> >
> >
> >> style="${location.of.xslt.above}">
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  > location="${location.of.jboss.xml.dtd}"/>
> >
> >   
> >
> >
> > The  tag above is optional. It's included here just to avoid
a
> > remote connection for the xml validation.
> >
> >
> > I hope this helps.
> >
> >
> > Greetings from Brazil!
> >
> >
> > Mauricio
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


Re: [JBoss-user] Many-to-many relation table is not being updated

2003-03-03 Thread Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka
Yes, 1:N relations work perfectly.
I'm usign default JBoss database (HSQLDB).
I've tested with MySQL too. Same problem... :-(

Mauricio


- Original Message -
From: "Marek Lange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Many-to-many relation table is not being updated


> > I tried this but it didn't work... :-(
> > I have tried on JBoss 3.2.0RC2 too, but it didn't work too. I'm stucked
on
> > this for almost 2 weeks by now. :-(
> >
> > If you have any other suggestion or an example of 2 EJB with a
many-to-many
> > relationship between them coded using XDoclet, please send me.
>
> The fact, that you get the correct results if you populate the database
> manually, proofs that the relation is correctly working. So there seems
> to be another reason why the inserts do not work.
>
> Have you set up a 1:n relation before? Does this work? Perhaps there is
> a problem with your database? What are you using?
>
> -marek



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


Re: [JBoss-user] Many-to-many relation table is not being updated

2003-03-02 Thread Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka
Hello Marek

I tried this but it didn't work... :-(
I have tried on JBoss 3.2.0RC2 too, but it didn't work too. I'm stucked on
this for almost 2 weeks by now. :-(

If you have any other suggestion or an example of 2 EJB with a many-to-many
relationship between them coded using XDoclet, please send me.

Thanks!

Mauricio

- Original Message -
From: "Marek Lange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Many-to-many relation table is not being updated


> > I have 2 entity EJBs (RoleBean and UserBean) with a many-to-many
> > relationship between them and a session EJB (SecurityControlBean) for
> > managing them. All EJBs are deployed correctly but I can't manage to
make
> > the relationship work correctly.
> >
> > When I manually "populate" the database (running INSERT SQL statements
on
> > the ROLE, USER and ROLE_USER tables) and run the method to query the
Roles
> > related to a User (SecurityControlBean.getAssignedRoles) everything
works
> > fine. However when I try to assing another Role to a User (using method
> > SecurityControlBean.assignRole) the collection
(UserBean.getRelatedRoles) is
> > correctly updated but the relation table (ROLE_USER) is not.
> >
> > I have increased the JBoss log detail to DEBUG and I don't see any
INSERT
> > statement being executed when the SecurityControlBean.assignRole is
> > executed.
>
> Perhaps you forget to set
>
> user.setRelatedRoles(roles);
>
> after
>
> ret = roles.add(role);
>
> Just an idea.
>
> -marek
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


Re: [JBoss-user] Deadlocks

2003-03-02 Thread Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka
Hi!

I didn't find any way do detect deadlocks on JBoss but you can change your
jboss.xml to tell JBoss which methods do not need an EJB lock.

In each  entry in jboss.xml file, do the following change (in this
example, get* methods are read-only):


Role
ejb/webflow/local/Role



get*
true




I didn't find any XDoclet @tag to do this but I coded a XSLT transform:


http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";>
 

 
   
 
   
 

 
  
   
   

 get*
 true

   
  
 



If you are using ant to build your project do something like this:

  
   
   
   
   
   

   
  

The  tag above is optional. It's included here just to avoid a
remote connection for the xml validation.

I hope this helps.

Greetings from Brazil!

Mauricio


- Original Message -
From: "Hunter Hillegas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBoss User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 5:00 PM
Subject: [JBoss-user] Deadlocks


> I am seeing some deadlocks in a CMP 2.0 app that I recently put into
> production on JBoss 3.0.4.
>
> 90% of my access with the entities is read only.
>
> What can I do to troubleshoot/track down these deadlocks and fix them?
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Hunter
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] Many-to-many relation table is not being updated

2003-03-01 Thread Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka
Hi gurus!

I have 2 entity EJBs (RoleBean and UserBean) with a many-to-many
relationship between them and a session EJB (SecurityControlBean) for
managing them. All EJBs are deployed correctly but I can't manage to make
the relationship work correctly.

When I manually "populate" the database (running INSERT SQL statements on
the ROLE, USER and ROLE_USER tables) and run the method to query the Roles
related to a User (SecurityControlBean.getAssignedRoles) everything works
fine. However when I try to assing another Role to a User (using method
SecurityControlBean.assignRole) the collection (UserBean.getRelatedRoles) is
correctly updated but the relation table (ROLE_USER) is not.

I have increased the JBoss log detail to DEBUG and I don't see any INSERT
statement being executed when the SecurityControlBean.assignRole is
executed.

Does anybody had a similar problem?
Can anybody point me what am I doing wrong?
I'm sending my code attached.
I'm using JBoss 3.0.6 (default configuration) and XDoclet 1.2.0 Beta 1.

Thanks in advance.

Mauricio
(Brazil)


SecurityControlBean.java
Description: Binary data


UserBean.java
Description: Binary data


RoleBean.java
Description: Binary data