[JBoss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Why do we need Interfaces

2006-03-20 Thread pgmjsd
If your 'stateful actions' are EJBs, then that's why.   


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3931314#3931314

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3931314


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Why do we need Interfaces

2006-03-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, we discussed this in the EJB EG and at the time we decided that we 
wouldn't try to eliminate the requirement for interfaces. I now regret that, 
esp. since in the context of Seam you find yourself writing interfaces that are 
never actually used anywhere (the only client is the EL, which is untyped!)

Hopefully in the next rev of EJB, we can fix this.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3931331#3931331

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3931331


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user