[JBoss-user] Sun One to Challenge JBoss

2003-02-11 Thread Tony Tortallini
Another free J2EE server hits the street.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,767989,00.asp

I think the difference between JBoss and Sun One is subtle but important and
summarized nicely by independent analyst Jason Bloomberg in that same
article:

What [Sun CEO Scott McNealy] either doesn't realize or won't admit is that
the SunONE Application Server is of such poor quality that they're having
trouble even giving it away, said Jason Bloomberg, an analyst at ZapThink
LLC., Cambridge, Mass.

Looks like Sun is going after a specific demographic: business that want
something for free and don't necessarily care whether it actually works. The
problem is that market is relatively small: Bob in Kansas City and a couple
of chicks running a website out of state prison.






---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



Re: [JBoss-user] Sun One to Challenge JBoss

2003-02-11 Thread John Hogan
This is a pretty slanted article because the SunONE 7.0 app server which is being 
discussed wasn't even released until about a week after the article was published.  
SunONE 7.0 is what is bundled with Solaris 9.  It's probably a safe bet Bloomberg was 
referring to iPlanet6.x and that he had no knowledge or experience with SunONE 7

I'm a long time JBoss fan and user, but I've used the SunONE 7.0 server too and it has 
come a long in addressing previous concerns and has know become very WebLogic like in 
terms of ease of use, documentation and support.   It is a complete, easy to use and 
comprehensive j2ee solution.

So, how can you say summarized nicely by JB?  Have you tried it out yourself?  If 
not here's a link that may open your eyes and mind 
(http://wwws.sun.com/software/products/appsrvr/home_appsrvr.html).  Enjoy

JohnH


- Original Message -
From: Tony Tortallini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 06:41:54 -0800 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] Sun One to Challenge JBoss

 Another free J2EE server hits the street.
 
 http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,767989,00.asp
 
 I think the difference between JBoss and Sun One is subtle but important and
 summarized nicely by independent analyst Jason Bloomberg in that same
 article:
 
 What [Sun CEO Scott McNealy] either doesn't realize or won't admit is that
 the SunONE Application Server is of such poor quality that they're having
 trouble even giving it away, said Jason Bloomberg, an analyst at ZapThink
 LLC., Cambridge, Mass.
 
 Looks like Sun is going after a specific demographic: business that want
 something for free and don't necessarily care whether it actually works. The
 problem is that market is relatively small: Bob in Kansas City and a couple
 of chicks running a website out of state prison.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
 SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
 http://www.vasoftware.com
 ___
 JBoss-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



Re: [JBoss-user] Sun One to Challenge JBoss

2003-02-11 Thread Tony Tortallini
Yeah, I'm the comment was in reference to iPlanet6.x because analysts are
always saying SunONE Application Server when they really mean iPlanet6.x.
The negative comment represents one man's opinion and I agree with you. They
are giving away SunONE Application Server to give the billing department a
rest, not because nobody would pay money for it. I think the same logic is
behind the inclusion of the demo version of weblogic. It's just a way of
offering the customer freedom of choice, but then you have to fork over the
big bucks to use either of them in a production environment. Some people
have commented that IBM is killing them in the market place on the high end
while JBoss is sweeping in on the flanks. I disagree, this is just Sun's
kind heart and concern for customers at work.

What [Sun CEO Scott McNealy] either doesn't realize or won't admit is that
the SunONE Application Server is of such poor quality that they're having
trouble even giving it away, said Jason Bloomberg, an analyst at ZapThink
LLC., Cambridge, Mass.

ep
- Original Message -
From: John Hogan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Sun One to Challenge JBoss


 This is a pretty slanted article because the SunONE 7.0 app server which
is being discussed wasn't even released until about a week after the article
was published.  SunONE 7.0 is what is bundled with Solaris 9.  It's probably
a safe bet Bloomberg was referring to iPlanet6.x and that he had no
knowledge or experience with SunONE 7

 I'm a long time JBoss fan and user, but I've used the SunONE 7.0 server
too and it has come a long in addressing previous concerns and has know
become very WebLogic like in terms of ease of use, documentation and
support.   It is a complete, easy to use and comprehensive j2ee solution.

 So, how can you say summarized nicely by JB?  Have you tried it out
yourself?  If not here's a link that may open your eyes and mind
(http://wwws.sun.com/software/products/appsrvr/home_appsrvr.html).  Enjoy

 JohnH


 - Original Message -
 From: Tony Tortallini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 06:41:54 -0800
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [JBoss-user] Sun One to Challenge JBoss

  Another free J2EE server hits the street.
 
  http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,767989,00.asp
 
  I think the difference between JBoss and Sun One is subtle but important
and
  summarized nicely by independent analyst Jason Bloomberg in that same
  article:
 
  What [Sun CEO Scott McNealy] either doesn't realize or won't admit is
that
  the SunONE Application Server is of such poor quality that they're
having
  trouble even giving it away, said Jason Bloomberg, an analyst at
ZapThink
  LLC., Cambridge, Mass.
 
  Looks like Sun is going after a specific demographic: business that want
  something for free and don't necessarily care whether it actually works.
The
  problem is that market is relatively small: Bob in Kansas City and a
couple
  of chicks running a website out of state prison.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ---
  This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
  SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
  http://www.vasoftware.com
  ___
  JBoss-user mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



 ---
 This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
 SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
 http://www.vasoftware.com
 ___
 JBoss-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



Re: [JBoss-user] Sun One to Challenge JBoss

2003-02-11 Thread Tom Coleman

It's hard to believe Sun is targeting JBoss.

They are probably getting desperate about NET.  If so, this is a pretty
clever strategy for getting more developers on J2EE.

Hopefully those developers won't find J2EE so overwhelming and 
Sun's product so restrictive that they'll be driven to NET anyhow.

Sun's stock was up recently, supposedly due to the release of some
new Systems Management software.  Sun may also be looking for a way to 
find more nodes to manage.

I hope Sun has their revenue model figured out.  I sure don't.



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user