[j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?
Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports - 4x 10G port - 3x full BGP table (ISP) plus about 5 BGP customers - 10x 1G port I was attracted to buy an MX-80 with it's 4x 10G ports unblocked. The downside of the MX80 is that it cannot be processor redundant (only from 240 and up) . Can a EX4500 handle the BGP part? It is cheaper and I think it can be redundant. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?
Ex cannot handle large tables. On Jun 6, 2011 1:16 PM, Correa Adolfo acor...@mcmtelecom.com.mx wrote: Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports - 4x 10G port - 3x full BGP table (ISP) plus about 5 BGP customers - 10x 1G port I was attracted to buy an MX-80 with it's 4x 10G ports unblocked. The downside of the MX80 is that it cannot be processor redundant (only from 240 and up) . Can a EX4500 handle the BGP part? It is cheaper and I think it can be redundant. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?
EX4500 can't handle full tables and the only way to make it redundant is through 2 of them in virtual chassis (not really the same as having two RE's in the same chassis)... I wish there was a way to make MX80 more redundant too ;) Paul -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Correa Adolfo Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 12:21 PM To: Puck Nether (juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net) Subject: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation? Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports - 4x 10G port - 3x full BGP table (ISP) plus about 5 BGP customers - 10x 1G port I was attracted to buy an MX-80 with it's 4x 10G ports unblocked. The downside of the MX80 is that it cannot be processor redundant (only from 240 and up) . Can a EX4500 handle the BGP part? It is cheaper and I think it can be redundant. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?
Correa, The EX4500 isn't going to support 3x full BGP tables. You can take a look the MX240 if you want a single box with redundant REs, or use (2) MX80s fully meshed. Thank you, Doug Hanks Systems Engineer JNCIP-M/T #1441 -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Correa Adolfo Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 9:21 AM To: Puck Nether (juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net) Subject: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation? Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports - 4x 10G port - 3x full BGP table (ISP) plus about 5 BGP customers - 10x 1G port I was attracted to buy an MX-80 with it's 4x 10G ports unblocked. The downside of the MX80 is that it cannot be processor redundant (only from 240 and up) . Can a EX4500 handle the BGP part? It is cheaper and I think it can be redundant. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?
Thanks Paul, Chris. -Original Message- From: Paul Stewart [mailto:p...@paulstewart.org] Sent: lunes, 06 de junio de 2011 12:23 p.m. To: Correa Adolfo; 'Puck Nether' Subject: RE: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation? EX4500 can't handle full tables and the only way to make it redundant is through 2 of them in virtual chassis (not really the same as having two RE's in the same chassis)... I wish there was a way to make MX80 more redundant too ;) Paul -Original Message- From: Chris Evans [mailto:chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com] Sent: lunes, 06 de junio de 2011 12:22 p.m. To: Correa Adolfo Cc: Puck Nether (juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net) Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation? Ex cannot handle large tables. [Correa Adolfo] -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Correa Adolfo Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 12:21 PM To: Puck Nether (juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net) Subject: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation? Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports - 4x 10G port - 3x full BGP table (ISP) plus about 5 BGP customers - 10x 1G port I was attracted to buy an MX-80 with it's 4x 10G ports unblocked. The downside of the MX80 is that it cannot be processor redundant (only from 240 and up) . Can a EX4500 handle the BGP part? It is cheaper and I think it can be redundant. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?
Thanks, -Original Message- From: Doug Hanks [mailto:dha...@juniper.net] Sent: lunes, 06 de junio de 2011 12:22 p.m. To: Correa Adolfo; Puck Nether (juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net) Subject: RE: 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation? Correa, The EX4500 isn't going to support 3x full BGP tables. You can take a look the MX240 if you want a single box with redundant REs, or use (2) MX80s fully meshed. Thank you, Doug Hanks Systems Engineer JNCIP-M/T #1441 -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Correa Adolfo Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 9:21 AM To: Puck Nether (juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net) Subject: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation? Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports - 4x 10G port - 3x full BGP table (ISP) plus about 5 BGP customers - 10x 1G port I was attracted to buy an MX-80 with it's 4x 10G ports unblocked. The downside of the MX80 is that it cannot be processor redundant (only from 240 and up) . Can a EX4500 handle the BGP part? It is cheaper and I think it can be redundant. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
