[cantor] [Bug 368986] Shouldn't the Julia back-end be an optional back-end ?

[Christoph Feck via KDE Bugzilla]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368986

Christoph Feck  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CONFIRMED   |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
  Latest Commit||http://commits.kde.org/cant
   ||or/b25211738b84f91533562599
   ||2826dbfe6b2d860f

--- Comment #2 from Christoph Feck  ---
Git commit b25211738b84f915335625992826dbfe6b2d860f by Ivan Lakhtanov.
Committed on 20/09/2016 at 12:43.
Pushed by ivanlakhtanov into branch 'master'.

Fixes for build system and added FindJulia.cmake

Bug: 368986
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D2575

A  +55   -0cmake/FindJulia.cmake
M  +12   -1src/backends/CMakeLists.txt
M  +1-1src/backends/julia/juliaserver/CMakeLists.txt

http://commits.kde.org/cantor/b25211738b84f915335625992826dbfe6b2d860f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[cantor] [Bug 368986] Shouldn't the Julia back-end be an optional back-end ?

[Filipe Saraiva via KDE Bugzilla]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368986

Filipe Saraiva  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|fil...@kde.org  |ivan.lakhta...@gmail.com
 CC||ivan.lakhta...@gmail.com
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Filipe Saraiva  ---
Hi Raymond, this problem was detected some weeks ago. Currently Ivan, the julia
backend developer, is working to fix it. Follow the work to fix it in [1].

[1] https://phabricator.kde.org/D2575

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.