[kde-freebsd] Fwd: misc/kdeedu4 breaks with ocaml- powerpc.o not found
With both default make and the below, ocaml breaks at asmrun. Error with make: cd asmrun; make all make; don't know how to make powerpc.o. Stop. Error from using the method below: http://slexy.org/view/s20O1v8Y1m I'm going to disable kdeedu4 in the build for kde4 for the moment. -- Forwarded message -- From: Super Bisquit Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:38 PM Subject: misc/kdeedu4 breaks with ocaml- powerpc.o not found To: kde-freebsd@kde.org I am aware that the next part isn't supported but, just to see if it will work. I've switched to the work/ocaml directory and ran ./configure, the make world && make opt && make install. Exactly where it breaks is where a patch for powerpc should go. I'll reply back to this message with that directory. ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
[kde-freebsd] misc/kdeedu4 breaks with ocaml- powerpc.o not found
I am aware that the next part isn't supported but, just to see if it will work. I've switched to the work/ocaml directory and ran ./configure, the make world && make opt && make install. Exactly where it breaks is where a patch for powerpc should go. I'll reply back to this message with that directory. ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
[kde-freebsd] Re: Building KDE on PowrPC
> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:49:45 -0500 > From: Jeremy Messenger > Sender: owner-freebsd-gn...@freebsd.org > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Super Bisquit > wrote: > > Okay kde4 breaks at /usr/ports/devel/py-gobject with configure missing > > gobject introspection. Gobject-introspection 0.10.4 (I am also building > > gnome3) stops at asking for the file to patch. > > > > This is affecting both desktop suites. > > Please post the error log that way I don't have to throw a wild guess. This is a Python issue. The update script for moving from 2.6 to 2.7 fails to re-install gobj-introspection and this results in several py-* ports failing. Just re-install the gobj-introspection port and everything will e fine. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: ober...@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
[kde-freebsd] Re: Building KDE on PowrPC
If kdeadmin4 is built without the printer configuration utility, then the error is skipped. Probably a few would want to do this but not all. On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Super Bisquit wrote: > http://slexy.org/view/s2Aj8bDvyF > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Jeremy Messenger > wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Super Bisquit >> wrote: >> > Okay kde4 breaks at /usr/ports/devel/py-gobject with configure missing >> > gobject introspection. Gobject-introspection 0.10.4 (I am also building >> > gnome3) stops at asking for the file to patch. >> > >> > This is affecting both desktop suites. >> >> Please post the error log that way I don't have to throw a wild guess. >> >> Cheers, >> Mezz >> >> >> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Super Bisquit >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> It just stopped at security/gnupg(2). I had to cd to work/gnupg* ad do >> >> ./configure then make. >> >> After it is finished, cd to x11/kde4 and make. >> >> Okay, gpg2 fails at work/gpg*/keyserver/gpgkeys_hkp.c:385 undefined >> >> reference to 'xfree.' >> >> I went back and enabled gpg1 from gpgme options. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 3/14/11, Alberto Villa wrote: >> >> > On Sunday 13 March 2011 17:46:54 Super Bisquit wrote: >> >> >> I'm doing a new build of kde4 on a Quicksilver 2002 G4. All is set >> for >> >> >> default configurations. Whatever won't build, I'll report >> >> > >> >> > hello! >> >> > >> >> > sorry for being so late. so, you started a build outside tinderbox, >> >> > right? >> >> > good! if you still need help to setup a tinderbox i'll be happy to >> help, >> >> > but >> >> > i >> >> > think we don't need both a build outside and inside tinderbox, so >> just >> >> > choose your preferred method :) >> >> > -- >> >> > Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer >> >> > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla >> >> > >> >> > I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. >> >> >> -- >> mezz.free...@gmail.com - m...@freebsd.org >> FreeBSD GNOME Team >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org >> > > ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
[kde-freebsd] Re: screen resolution 1024x600 and KDE applications
El día Wednesday, March 16, 2011 a las 11:59:03AM +0100, Alberto Villa escribió: > On Wednesday 16 March 2011 10:46:59 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > A lot of so called netbooks have a limited screen resolution in high to > > 600 (1024x600 or even only 800x600); sometimes KDE applications have > > subwindows, for example for configurations, which does not fit into the > > high of 600, they have no scrollbars and I don't see how to move them up > > to see the buttons for 'OK' or 'Cancel' :-( > > you can use alt + left click to move a window, dragging it from any position > > in addition, from kde 4.5 you can drag a window clicking on most empty > (grey) zones for moving a Window in KDE 3.5 I was aware of the methods 1) and 2): 1) left click in the titel-bar and move the window around while hold down left mouse button (ofc moving stops at the upper border of the screen) 2) bring up the menue by right click in any window border, select 'Move' from menu; the pointer centers in this case in the window and you can move the window, but only up to the point where titel bar touches the upper border of the screen; 3) what I now have learned (alt + left click to move a window) bahaves nearly as 2) but you can move the titel bar out of the screen (which solves my problem); but: why has 2) this limitation of the upper border of screen? Thx in any case for your hint matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
[kde-freebsd] Re: screen resolution 1024x600 and KDE applications
On Wednesday 16 March 2011 10:46:59 Matthias Apitz wrote: > A lot of so called netbooks have a limited screen resolution in high to > 600 (1024x600 or even only 800x600); sometimes KDE applications have > subwindows, for example for configurations, which does not fit into the > high of 600, they have no scrollbars and I don't see how to move them up > to see the buttons for 'OK' or 'Cancel' :-( you can use alt + left click to move a window, dragging it from any position in addition, from kde 4.5 you can drag a window clicking on most empty (grey) zones -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla Keep patting your enemy on the back until a small bullet hole appears between your fingers. -- Joe Bonanno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
[kde-freebsd] Re: What happens?
On Monday 14 March 2011 00:52:26 echo "name" >> /dev/null echo "surname" >> /dev/null wrote: > Dear KDE team: > I've seen that has not yet released the update to KDE 4.6 and I think SC > and SC van for KDE 4.6.1, I've seen that has not been updated to version > of Xfce version 4.8 and apparently it is because teams have recently > migrated to udev / hal. I wonder if this is called freedom, namely desktop > environments like KDE, Gnome or Xfce are supposed to be free and freely > distributed. So why is it that the core team of these free projects just > worry about linux? and not other operating systems that do not use the > implementation of udev / hal? How is it possible that FreeBSD Forum > [See here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=21043&page=2] > has been an attempt to implement or something like udev in the FreeBSD > kernel to use these environments? What are we? Why such a monopoly with > linux? If KDE is really multiplatform How can this be allowed? I would like > to know what you think, and what you are doing to use KDE 4.6 on FreeBSD, > not just me but a crowd. > > Cheers and have a nice evening, thank you for your attention. kde 4.6 was not yet released to ports because: http://blogs.freebsdish.org/avilla/2011/03/01/kde-sc-4-6-on-freebsd- roadmap developers make stuff for linux only because they're mainly linux users. luckily, kde is pretty good at supporting freebsd (e.g., even if they've moved to udev, they still support hal), and we (kde@ team) try to fill the holes they leave open (and we're also working on getting devd support in), which is made easier by the abstraction layers they have created xfce seems to be in a worse position, as udev is probably directly used across the whole codebase, then porting it to devd requires a noticeable amount of work... -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla The optimum committee has no members. -- Norman Augustine signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
[kde-freebsd] Re: What happens?
On Sunday March 13 2011 18:52:26 echo "name" >> /dev/null echo "surname" >> /dev/null wrote: > Dear KDE team: > I've seen that has not yet released the update to KDE 4.6 and I think SC > and SC van for KDE 4.6.1, I've seen that has not been updated to version > of Xfce version 4.8 and apparently it is because teams have recently > migrated to udev / hal. I wonder if this is called freedom, namely desktop > environments like KDE, Gnome or Xfce are supposed to be free and freely > distributed. So why is it that the core team of these free projects just > worry about linux? and not other operating systems that do not use the > implementation of udev / hal? How is it possible that FreeBSD Forum > [See here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=21043&page=2] > has been an attempt to implement or something like udev in the FreeBSD > kernel to use these environments? What are we? Why such a monopoly with > linux? If KDE is really multiplatform How can this be allowed? I would like > to know what you think, and what you are doing to use KDE 4.6 on FreeBSD, > not just me but a crowd. > > Cheers and have a nice evening, thank you for your attention. You wrote "freedom". If KDE, GNOME, Hfce decided to write a desktop for Linux is this a FREE decission of the develpers. It is mine opinion. Mitja http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
[kde-freebsd] screen resolution 1024x600 and KDE applications
Hello, A lot of so called netbooks have a limited screen resolution in high to 600 (1024x600 or even only 800x600); sometimes KDE applications have subwindows, for example for configurations, which does not fit into the high of 600, they have no scrollbars and I don't see how to move them up to see the buttons for 'OK' or 'Cancel' :-( Do I overlook something? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
[kde-freebsd] Re: Building KDE on PowrPC
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Super Bisquit wrote: > Okay kde4 breaks at /usr/ports/devel/py-gobject with configure missing > gobject introspection. Gobject-introspection 0.10.4 (I am also building > gnome3) stops at asking for the file to patch. > > This is affecting both desktop suites. Please post the error log that way I don't have to throw a wild guess. Cheers, Mezz > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Super Bisquit > wrote: >> >> It just stopped at security/gnupg(2). I had to cd to work/gnupg* ad do >> ./configure then make. >> After it is finished, cd to x11/kde4 and make. >> Okay, gpg2 fails at work/gpg*/keyserver/gpgkeys_hkp.c:385 undefined >> reference to 'xfree.' >> I went back and enabled gpg1 from gpgme options. >> >> >> On 3/14/11, Alberto Villa wrote: >> > On Sunday 13 March 2011 17:46:54 Super Bisquit wrote: >> >> I'm doing a new build of kde4 on a Quicksilver 2002 G4. All is set for >> >> default configurations. Whatever won't build, I'll report >> > >> > hello! >> > >> > sorry for being so late. so, you started a build outside tinderbox, >> > right? >> > good! if you still need help to setup a tinderbox i'll be happy to help, >> > but >> > i >> > think we don't need both a build outside and inside tinderbox, so just >> > choose your preferred method :) >> > -- >> > Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer >> > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla >> > >> > I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. -- mezz.free...@gmail.com - m...@freebsd.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
[kde-freebsd] What happens?
Dear KDE team: I've seen that has not yet released the update to KDE 4.6 and I think SC and SC van for KDE 4.6.1, I've seen that has not been updated to version of Xfce version 4.8 and apparently it is because teams have recently migrated to udev / hal. I wonder if this is called freedom, namely desktop environments like KDE, Gnome or Xfce are supposed to be free and freely distributed. So why is it that the core team of these free projects just worry about linux? and not other operating systems that do not use the implementation of udev / hal? How is it possible that FreeBSD Forum [See here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=21043&page=2] has been an attempt to implement or something like udev in the FreeBSD kernel to use these environments? What are we? Why such a monopoly with linux? If KDE is really multiplatform How can this be allowed? I would like to know what you think, and what you are doing to use KDE 4.6 on FreeBSD, not just me but a crowd. Cheers and have a nice evening, thank you for your attention. ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
