Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Fix RHEL systemd-boot-unsigned dependency for

2023-02-28 Thread Jeffrey Layton (via Email Bridge)
From: Jeffrey Layton on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2341#note_1295721882

This packaging change seems to have crept into more recent systemd packages on
rhel9 though. My centos9 dist-brew build failed even with this change because
of:

`dracut: Can't find a uefi stub '/usr/lib/systemd/boot/efi/linuxx64.efi.stub'
to create a UEFI executable`

That build had systemd-252-8.el9.x86_64 installed. The brew build for that is
here

 https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/buildinfo?buildID=2393085

...and with that, the uefi stub is in systemd-boot-
unsigned-252-8.el9.x86_64.rpm.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Fix RHEL systemd-boot-unsigned dependency for

2023-02-28 Thread Jeffrey Layton (via Email Bridge)
From: Jeffrey Layton on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2341#note_1295708985

Shouldn't this be >= 9 ? We need this change in RHEL9 as well as 10, no?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue