subject:"\\\\\\\[Kernel\\\\\\\-packages\\\\\\\] \\\\\\\[Bug 1696049\\\\\\\] Re\\\\\\\: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails"

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2019-07-24 Thread Brad Figg

** Tags added: cscc

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2018-10-03 Thread bugproxy

** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin16044
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin1804

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2018-07-01 Thread bugproxy

** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin16043
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin16044

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-11-06 Thread Andrew Cloke

** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-10-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.10.0-38.42

---
linux (4.10.0-38.42) zesty; urgency=low

  * linux: 4.10.0-38.42 -proposed tracker (LP: #1722330)

  * Controller lockup detected on ProLiant DL380 Gen9 with P440 Controller
(LP: #1720359)
- scsi: hpsa: limit transfer length to 1MB

  * [Dell Docking IE][0bda:8153] Realtek USB Ethernet leads to system hang
(LP: #1720977)
- r8152: fix the list rx_done may be used without initialization

  * Touchpad not detected in Lenovo X1 Yoga / Yoga 720-15IKB (LP: #1700657)
- mfd: intel-lpss: Add missing PCI ID for Intel Sunrise Point LPSS devices

  * Add installer support for Broadcom BCM573xx network drivers. (LP: #1720466)
- d-i: Add bnxt_en to nic-modules.

  * CVE-2017-1000252
- KVM: VMX: Do not BUG() on out-of-bounds guest IRQ

  * CVE-2017-10663
- f2fs: sanity check checkpoint segno and blkoff

  * xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails (LP: #1696049)
- xfs: fix off-by-one on max nr_pages in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff()

  * [P9, Power NV][ WSP][Ubuntu 16.04.03] : perf hw breakpoint command results
in call traces and system goes for reboot. (LP: #1706033)
- powerpc/64s: Handle data breakpoints in Radix mode

  * 5U84 - ses driver isn't binding right - cannot blink lights on 1 of the 2
5u84 (LP: #1693369)
- scsi: ses: do not add a device to an enclosure if enclosure_add_links()
  fails.

  * Vlun resize request could fail with cxlflash driver (LP: #1713575)
- scsi: cxlflash: Fix vlun resize failure in the shrink path

  * More migrations with constant load (LP: #1713576)
- sched/fair: Prefer sibiling only if local group is under-utilized

  * New PMU fixes for marked events. (LP: #1716491)
- powerpc/perf: POWER9 PMU stops after idle workaround

  * CVE-2017-14340
- xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device present

  * [Zesty][Yakkety] rtl8192e bug fixes (LP: #1698470)
- staging: rtl8192e: rtl92e_fill_tx_desc fix write to mapped out memory.
- staging: rtl8192e: fix 2 byte alignment of register BSSIDR.
- staging: rtl8192e: rtl92e_get_eeprom_size Fix read size of EPROM_CMD.
- staging: rtl8192e: GetTs Fix invalid TID 7 warning.

  * Stranded with ENODEV after mdadm --readonly (LP: #1706243)
- md: MD_CLOSING needs to be cleared after called md_set_readonly or
  do_md_stop

  * multipath -ll is not showing the disks which are actually multipath
(LP: #1718397)
- fs: aio: fix the increment of aio-nr and counting against aio-max-nr

  * ETPS/2 Elantech Touchpad inconsistently detected (Gigabyte P57W laptop)
(LP: #1594214)
- Input: i8042 - add Gigabyte P57 to the keyboard reset table

  * CVE-2017-10911
- xen-blkback: don't leak stack data via response ring

  * CVE-2017-11176
- mqueue: fix a use-after-free in sys_mq_notify()

  * implement 'complain mode' in seccomp for developer mode with snaps
(LP: #1567597)
- Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: seccomp: log actions even when audit is disabled"
- seccomp: Provide matching filter for introspection
- seccomp: Sysctl to display available actions
- seccomp: Operation for checking if an action is available
- seccomp: Sysctl to configure actions that are allowed to be logged
- seccomp: Selftest for detection of filter flag support
- seccomp: Action to log before allowing

  * implement errno action logging in seccomp for strict mode with snaps
(LP: #1721676)
- Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: seccomp: log actions even when audit is disabled"
- seccomp: Provide matching filter for introspection
- seccomp: Sysctl to display available actions
- seccomp: Operation for checking if an action is available
- seccomp: Sysctl to configure actions that are allowed to be logged
- seccomp: Selftest for detection of filter flag support
- seccomp: Filter flag to log all actions except SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW

  * Backport recent bbr bugfixes to 4.10 kernel (LP: #1708604)
- tcp_bbr: cut pacing rate only if filled pipe
- tcp_bbr: introduce bbr_bw_to_pacing_rate() helper
- tcp_bbr: introduce bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt() helper
- tcp_bbr: remove sk_pacing_rate=0 transient during init
- tcp_bbr: init pacing rate on first RTT sample

  * [SRU][Zesty] Fix lscpu segfault on ARM64 with SMBIOS v2.0 (LP: #1716483)
- arm64: kernel: restrict /dev/mem read() calls to linear region

 -- Kleber Sacilotto de Souza   Tue, 10 Oct
2017 13:49:34 +0200

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2017-1000252

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2017-10663

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2017-10911

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2017-11176

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2017-14340

-- 
You

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-10-30 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo

** Tags removed: verification-needed-zesty
** Tags added: verification-done-zesty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-10-20 Thread Manoj Iyer

** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-10-18 Thread Kleber Sacilotto de Souza

This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
zesty' to 'verification-done-zesty'. If the problem still exists, change
the tag 'verification-needed-zesty' to 'verification-failed-zesty'.

If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: verification-needed-zesty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-10-09 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-10-06 Thread Joseph Salisbury

SRU request submitted:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2017-October/087486.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-10-05 Thread Joseph Salisbury

The reverse bisect reported the following commit as the fix:

8affebe ("xfs: fix off-by-one on max nr_pages in
xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff()")

I built a 17.04(Zesty) test kernel with a pick of this commit.  The test
kernel can be downloaded from:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049/

Can you test this kernel and see if it resolves this bug?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-10-03 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
8affebe16d79ebefb1d9d6d56a46dc89716f9453

The test kernel can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049

Can you test that kernel and report back if it has the bug or not? I
will build the next test kernel based on your test results.

Thanks in advance

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-10-02 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c

The test kernel can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049

Can you test that kernel and report back if it has the bug or not? I
will build the next test kernel based on your test results.

Thanks in advance

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-29 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
a4d768e702de224cc85e0c8eac9311763403b368

The test kernel can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049

Can you test that kernel and report back if it has the bug or not? I
will build the next test kernel based on your test results.

Thanks in advance

Hide

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-28 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
ea9a46e1c49251331dbfda19ced7114337966178

The test kernel can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049

Can you test that kernel and report back if it has the bug or not? I
will build the next test kernel based on your test results.

Thanks in advance

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-27 Thread Joseph Salisbury

Sorry, ppc kernels are there now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-26 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
d7fd24257aa60316bf81093f7f909dc9475ae974

The test kernel can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049

Can you test that kernel and report back if it has the bug or not? I
will build the next test kernel based on your test results.

Thanks in advance

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-25 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
8aa6382907fa495e6b8b8184b53e36d142ffd8da

The test kernel can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049

Can you test that kernel and report back if it has the bug or not? I
will build the next test kernel based on your test results.

Thanks in advance

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-22 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
ae08ea976862dcd058af89fcddc2ef4790b4a2bd

The test kernel can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049

Can you test that kernel and report back if it has the bug or not? I
will build the next test kernel based on your test results.

Thanks in advance

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-21 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
6741d51699ac9ef21f1fac14c63ecd31d3a7c278

The test kernel can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049

Can you test that kernel and report back if it has the bug or not? I
will build the next test kernel based on your test results.

Thanks in advance

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-20 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I started a "Reverse" kernel bisect between v4.12.rc2 final and
v4.12-rc3. The kernel bisect will require testing of about 7-10 test
kernels.

I built the first test kernel, up to the following commit:
6ce47829113772b1d6b9046f5eaf00e154f0f9de

The test kernel can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049

Can you test that kernel and report back if it has the bug or not?  I
will build the next test kernel based on your test results.

Thanks in advance

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-20 Thread Joseph Salisbury

Ok, thanks for testing.  The previous three kernels were to test if any
of the following three commits were the fix:

a54fba8 xfs: Move handling of missing page into one place in 
xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff()
d7fd242 xfs: Fix off-by-in in loop termination in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff()
5375023 xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation


Your testing confirms they do not fix this bug in Xenial(4.4).  We will 
probably have to perform a "Reverse" bisect between v4.12-rc2 and v4.12-rc3 to 
identify the commit that fixes this issue in -rc3.  I'll post a test kernel 
shortly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-19 Thread Joseph Salisbury

A ppc kernel is now available at:
 http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-18 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I have one last test kernel we can try before bisecting.  Can you test the next 
kernel posted to:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-13 Thread Joseph Salisbury

Can you test the next kernel posted to:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-12 Thread Joseph Salisbury

Ok, there is now a ppc64 test kernel here:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-12 Thread Joseph Salisbury

Sorry, I'll build a ppc specific kernel and post it shortly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-11 Thread Joseph Salisbury

Before I start the bisect, can you test the kernel posted to:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1696049/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-07 Thread Joseph Salisbury

In the description, you mention commit 5375023ae12 fixes this bug for
the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.  Commit 5375023ae12
was introduced in v4.12-rc3.

Have you been testing generic/285 in the testing requesting since
comment #12?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-06 Thread Joseph Salisbury

It looks like the fix came in with one of the 4.12 release candidates,
so we should narrow that version down further.  Can you test the
following:

v4.12-rc2: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.12-rc2
v4.12-rc4: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.12-rc4
v4.12-rc6: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.12-rc6

You don't have to test every kernel, just up until the first kernel that
does not have this bug.

Thanks in advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-05 Thread Joseph Salisbury

Can you test the following two kernels next:

4.12-rc1: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.12-rc1/
4.13-rc1: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.13-rc1/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-09-01 Thread Joseph Salisbury

I'd like to perform a reverse bisect to figure out which commit upstream fixes 
this regression.  We need to figure out  the last kernel that had this issue 
and the first kernel that did not.
Can you test the following kernels and report back? We are looking for the last 
kernel version that has the bug and the first that does not:

v4.11-rc1: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.11-rc1/
v4.11-rc4: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.11-rc4/
v4.11-rc7: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.11-rc8/

You don't have to test every kernel, just up until the first kernel that
does not have this bug.

Thanks in advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-08-21 Thread Manoj Iyer

** Tags removed: triage-a
** Tags added: triage-g

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-08-16 Thread Joseph Salisbury

Can you also see if this issue is already fixed in the latest upstream
stable 4.10 kernel?  It is available from:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.10.17/

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Artful)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-08-14 Thread Frank Heimes

** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-07-25 Thread Joseph Salisbury

Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream stable kernel?
Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the
latest v4.11 stable kernel[0].

If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following
tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'.

If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the tag:
'kernel-bug-exists-upstream'.

If you are unable to test the mainline kernel, for example it will not boot, 
please add the tag: 'kernel-unable-to-test-upstream'.
Once testing of the upstream kernel is complete, please mark this bug as 
"Confirmed".

Thanks in advance.

[0] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.11.12/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-07-25 Thread Joseph Salisbury

Since this issue is fixed in 4.12.1-041201-generic, we should be able to
perform a "Reverse" bisect to identify the exact commit that fixes the
bug.  We can then SRU it to any prior kernel versions that need the fix.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Joseph 
Salisbury (jsalisbury)

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Artful)
   Importance: High
 Assignee: Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury)
   Status: In Progress

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-07-24 Thread Manoj Iyer

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage (ubuntu-power-triage) => 
Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team)

** Tags added: triage-a

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1696049] Re: xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

2017-07-24 Thread Frank Heimes

** Package changed: xfstt (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696049

Title:
  xfstest sanity checks on seek operations fails

Status in The Ubuntu-power-systems project:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Harish Sriram 
  Issue:
  --
  xfstest fails with sanity checks on seek operations

  # uname -a
  Linux ltc-tuleta12 4.10.0-21-generic #23~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 2 
12:54:57 UTC 2017 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Create a loop device with xfs filesystem
  2. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git; cd 
xfstests-dev
  3. make
  4. Create a local.config for running with created loop device
  5. Run xfstests-dev test  : ./check tests/generic/285 or ./check 
tests/generic/436

  The test 285 fails with following
  ...
  ...
  07. Test file with unwritten extents, only have dirty pages
  07.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  07.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  07.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  07.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  08. Test file with unwritten extents, only have unwritten pages
  08.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 0 or 45056, got 0.   succ
  08.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 1 or 45056, got 1.   succ
  08.03 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL
  08.04 SEEK_DATA expected 40960 or 40960, got -1.  FAIL

  The test 436 fails with 
  ...
  ...
  14. Test file with unwritten extents, small hole after pagevec dirty pages
  14.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 917504 or 4194304, got 3670016.  FAIL
  14.03 SEEK_HOLE expected 3670016 or 4194304, got 3670016. succ
  14.04 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0.   succ
  14.05 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1.   succ
  14.06 SEEK_DATA expected 2752512 or 2752512, got 2752512. succ

  seek sanity check failed!

  Full log is attached.

  == Comment: #6 - Harish Sriram

  commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c
  Author: Jan Kara 
  Date:   Thu May 18 16:36:22 2017 -0700

  xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation
  XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
  can be seen by the following command:
  
  xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
 -c "seek -h 0" file
  wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
  56 KiB, 14 ops; 0. sec (49.312 MiB/sec and 12623.9856 ops/sec)
  wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
  8 KiB, 2 ops; 0. sec (70.383 MiB/sec and 18018.0180 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  HOLE139264
  
  Where we can see that hole at offset 56k was just ignored by SEEK_HOLE
  implementation. The bug is in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() which does
  not properly detect the case when pages are not contiguous.
  
  Fix the problem by properly detecting when found page has larger offset
  than expected.
  
  CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
  Fixes: d126d43f631f996daeee5006714fed914be32368
  Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
  Reviewed-by: Brian Foster 
  Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong 
  Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 

  
  The above commit fixes the generic/436 test, but generic/285 still FAILS.

  The generic/285 failure is reproducible on most P8/P9 systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1696049/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

39 matches

Mail list logo