Re: 2.6.10 no boot
There it is an 4th edition of LDD that will be released this year http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920030867.do Maybe oreilly will release the digital version sooner On 04/06, Marcello Stanisci wrote: > > 2.6.10 is _very_ old, it proabably doesn't even work on modern hardware. > > Why are you trying to use such an old kernel release? > > to study the examples that are in your book ;-) I mean LDD3. > I tried to build the snull driver with 2.6.39 but it doesn't compile, > so I decided to work > on the same version of the kernel as the book does. > > ___ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies > ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: 2.6.10 no boot
> 2.6.10 is _very_ old, it proabably doesn't even work on modern hardware. > Why are you trying to use such an old kernel release? to study the examples that are in your book ;-) I mean LDD3. I tried to build the snull driver with 2.6.39 but it doesn't compile, so I decided to work on the same version of the kernel as the book does. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: ipv6 multipath (ECMP) routing
2014-04-07 19:44 GMT+04:00 "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky" : > Patch was accept by David Miller in 2012. You can be absolutely sure > that IPv6 ECMP is in 3.12. :) Thanks!=) Now i need only to get bird patches for ipv6 ecmp=) -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru jabber: v...@selfip.ru ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: ipv6 multipath (ECMP) routing
07.04.2014, 19:33, "Vasiliy Tolstov" : > Hi all. I can't find answer in google, does linux 3.12 support ECMP > routing vith ipv6? Patch was accept by David Miller in 2012. You can be absolutely sure that IPv6 ECMP is in 3.12. :) -- wbr, Oleg. "Anarchy is about taking complete responsibility for yourself." Alan Moore. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
ipv6 multipath (ECMP) routing
Hi all. I can't find answer in google, does linux 3.12 support ECMP routing vith ipv6? -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru jabber: v...@selfip.ru ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Measuring Network Packet processing time
Hi all, I’m running xen 4.2 on Linux Kernel 3.7 and I’m trying to figure out the time taken(latency) by a network packet to reach it’s destination VM from the time it arrives at the NIC. What do you think is the best way to do it? I was thinking may be add rdtsc timestamp to the IP options header on arrival, and one more when it reaches to its desired VM and examine the two timestamps. I’ve not figured out a way to do this yet—but do you think this is a viable option or what other methods would you recommend? Thanks, Sunny ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: 2.6.10 no boot
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:59:04AM +0200, Marcello Stanisci wrote: > > 2.6.10 is _very_ old, it proabably doesn't even work on modern hardware. > > Why are you trying to use such an old kernel release? > > to study the examples that are in your book ;-) I mean LDD3. > I tried to build the snull driver with 2.6.39 but it doesn't compile, > so I decided to work > on the same version of the kernel as the book does. 2.6.39 is also really old, don't use it. If you search around, there are updated versions of the examples online, that work with the latest kernel releases, so I'd recommend using that. good luck, greg k-h ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: 2.6.10 no boot
> Unless it's a really old box, Linux probably isn't sure how to support > it. Remember that in 2004, Intel was still releasing new versions of > the Pentium 4 as their high-end CPUs the same happens on a pretty old box, it should be from the early 2000s. But I forgot to mention another thing: I patched it with a patch for 2.6.11 to make it compile with binutils 2.22 (otherwise the assembler would complain), and, although the compilation silently ends, it probably messed up something. I will look for the same patch for 2.6.10, or to downgrade my binutils. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: A new way to dive into the kernel!
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 16:13 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Mark Wallace wrote: > > Hi, it often takes me a few hours to get response. You should get responsed > > within a day, email then if you still have trouble. > > > > FYI. > > Are you guys getting automated responses, or is there a human on the > other end looking at what you are sending? Definitely human, I had my initial doubts, but I started being more human and the replies the same :-) Whoever these folks are, huge thanks to them! ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: 2.6.10 no boot
> But I forgot to mention another thing: > > I patched it with a patch for 2.6.11 to make it compile with binutils > 2.22 (otherwise the assembler > would complain), and, although the compilation silently ends, it > probably messed up something. > I will look for the same patch for 2.6.10, or to downgrade my binutils. For those interested, the patch is that one: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.6-seg-5.patch ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
