Re: [LARTC] Re: For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ?
> Well, pfifo is a discipline at the end of class, not the class. > > I'm using sfq for every customer (the are limited to 256/384/512kbit), so > they > will be able to use the Internet even when using p2p programs. But p2p programs create a lot of connection flows, so statistically SFQ will give the p2p a lot more traffic to them, compared to just several flows for "normal" trafic like http, pop3 and smtp. Or you're doing something else too? -- damjan | дамјан This is my jabber ID --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- not my mail address, it's a Jabber ID --^ :) ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] Re: For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ?
Dnia piątek, 2 czerwca 2006 13:09, Stefano Mainardi napisał(a): > 2006/6/2, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Stefano Mainardi wrote: > > > Hi to all, > > > i'm following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is > > > very detailed, but i'm a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of > > > leaf classes. > > > > > > In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached at > > > message) in this way: > > > > > > # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo lmit 10 ^ > > > > rather that way: > > > > # tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo limit 10 ^ > > therefore??? I do not understand ... Well, pfifo is a discipline at the end of class, not the class. I'm using sfq for every customer (the are limited to 256/384/512kbit), so they will be able to use the Internet even when using p2p programs. -- | pozdrawiam / greetings | powered by Trustix, Gentoo and FreeBSD | | Kajetan Staszkiewicz | jabber,email,www: vegeta()tuxpowered net | |Vegeta | IMQ devnames: http://www.tuxpowered.net | `^--' pgpzQUKn34R6R.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] Re: For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ?
2006/6/2, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Stefano Mainardi wrote:> Hi to all,> i'm following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is> very detailed, but i'm a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of > leaf classes.>> In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached at> message) in this way:>> # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo lmit 10 rather that way:# tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo limit 10therefore??? I do not understand ...-- Stefano MainardiPresidente Associazione ILDN - Italian Linux Distro Network Mobile: 349/3917212Skype: mainardistefanoIM (ICQ): 250-292-408Blog: http://www.mainardistefano.org ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[LARTC] Re: For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ?
Stefano Mainardi wrote: Hi to all, i'm following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is very detailed, but i'm a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of leaf classes. In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached at message) in this way: # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo lmit 10 rather that way: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo limit 10 Jarek P. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc