Re: [LARTC] HTB: Two OOPSes fixed (wrong subject above - sorry)

[Kabelweb]

On Wednesday 10 December 2003 10:57, Ben Efros wrote:
> The answer is in your own email
>
> > > Patch against
> > > 2.4.23 and 2.6.0-test10 is here

Thank you but I was asking for a good reason: The only significant change in 
the patch itself is commented as follows:

+   /* This line used to be after htb_destroy_class call below
+  and surprisingly it worked in 2.4. But it must precede it 
+  because filter need its target class alive to be able to call
+  unbind_filter on it (without Oops). */
+   htb_destroy_filters(&q->filter_list);

Therefore I wanted to know whether the Ooopses fixed by the patch are known to 
be possible with 2.4 as well or not. I am currently trying to find the cause 
for very rare hangups (about once in two months) on a production server which 
heavily uses htb.

Anyone with first-hand experience?

Best regards,

Andreas
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB: Two OOPSes fixed

[Kabelweb]

On Sunday 07 December 2003 12:49, devik wrote:
> Two oopses were found by zhaoyao and Daniel Blueman. Patch against
> 2.4.23 and 2.6.0-test10 is here. It will be included in next kernel
> releases of course.

Did this OOOPSes only affect 2.6 kernels or did (could) they occur on 2.4 as 
well?

Thanks for the help...

Andreas
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/