Re: [LegacyUG] [OT] Some email basics [Was: something totally unrelated]

2006-12-07 Thread Theodore Rissmiller
Thank you Mike.  That is exactly what I did.  I did not touch Arnold's 
message, as he indicates, but instead used Geoff's message to comment on 
what happened to me when I tried to download.


Again - Thank you.

 

Ted Rissmiller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you heard about Legacy Family Tree? This highly acclaimed genealogy
program can be downloaded FREE at
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Index.asp?mid=6527Oji

I handle all of my spam problems with MailWasherPro.  Do you?href="http://fta.firetrust.com/index.cgi?id=pastortedr&page=1";>


- Original Message - 
From: "Mike Fry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 5:47 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] [OT] Some email basics [Was: something totally 
unrelated]




Arnold Sprague wrote:

Mike,
My complaint is that Ted removed my text from the message. As a result, 
Sherry and others began to discuss Ted's concern and mine was lost.
Similarly, you removed part of my message when you made this reply. 
Again, the guts of my message becomes lost.




Arnold,
Look at the date/time sequence of the messages in question. I think you'll 
see that Ted didn't reply to your message. If I read things correctly, Ted 
did exactly what you did - used Geoff Rasmussens' original 6.0.0.117 
announcement message. So, to be pedantic, you both hijacked Geoff's 
message :-)


To others that are wondering about the use of the terms kidnapping and 
hijacking of threads. This occurs when people are not particularly careful 
in their haste to start a new thread and inadvertently(?) reply to 
whatever it was that the last message they were reading was. When they 
reply to an existing message, their message, possibly under the guise of a 
new, totally unrelated subject, becomes part of an existing thread. If 
they were to have written a new message, a new thread would have been 
started.


This happens far too often on this list and tends to muck up the message 
threading. Please note, proper threading does NOT happen on the contents 
of the message subject field. It happens through a normally unseen message 
header (part of the message envelope if you like). When you reply to a 
message, your reply contains a reference to the message that you are 
replying to. This reference is used by all decent email clients (not 
web-based email necessarily) to maintain the sequence of messages and 
replies.


--
Regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg.


*** Give the gift of Legacy for the holidays! Order online at 
http://legacyfamilytree.com/Redirect/Store-Legacy.asp or call 
1-800-753-3453. ***


Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp


To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/


For online technical support, please visit 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp


To unsubscribe please visit: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





This message has been processed by Firetrust Benign.






*** Give the gift of Legacy for the holidays! Order online at 
http://legacyfamilytree.com/Redirect/Store-Legacy.asp or call 1-800-753-3453. 
***

Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

For online technical support, please visit 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




[LegacyUG] [OT] Some email basics [Was: something totally unrelated]

2006-12-07 Thread Mike Fry

Arnold Sprague wrote:

Mike,
My complaint is that Ted removed my text from the message. As a result, 
Sherry and others began to discuss Ted's concern and mine was lost.
Similarly, you removed part of my message when you made this reply. 
Again, the guts of my message becomes lost.




Arnold,
Look at the date/time sequence of the messages in question. I think 
you'll see that Ted didn't reply to your message. If I read things 
correctly, Ted did exactly what you did - used Geoff Rasmussens' 
original 6.0.0.117 announcement message. So, to be pedantic, you both 
hijacked Geoff's message :-)


To others that are wondering about the use of the terms kidnapping and 
hijacking of threads. This occurs when people are not particularly 
careful in their haste to start a new thread and inadvertently(?) reply 
to whatever it was that the last message they were reading was. When 
they reply to an existing message, their message, possibly under the 
guise of a new, totally unrelated subject, becomes part of an existing 
thread. If they were to have written a new message, a new thread would 
have been started.


This happens far too often on this list and tends to muck up the message 
threading. Please note, proper threading does NOT happen on the contents 
of the message subject field. It happens through a normally unseen 
message header (part of the message envelope if you like). When you 
reply to a message, your reply contains a reference to the message that 
you are replying to. This reference is used by all decent email clients 
(not web-based email necessarily) to maintain the sequence of messages 
and replies.


--
Regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg.


*** Give the gift of Legacy for the holidays! Order online at 
http://legacyfamilytree.com/Redirect/Store-Legacy.asp or call 1-800-753-3453. 
***

Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

For online technical support, please visit 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp