Re: Add an IP alias to ethernet interface

2007-06-07 Thread Zachary Kotlarek


On Jun 6, 2007, at 6:34 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:

I suspect the alias option exists in ip for compatibility with  
ifconfig,

and no other reason.  But I don't know that for sure.


I believe that's correct. In the past the kernel supported aliases  
with independent statistics and the like, but that hasn't been true  
for years. Modern kernels don't treat aliases interfaces any  
different than secondary addresses on the main interface -- both  
interface statistics and iptables traversal treat all aliases just  
like the main interface, and the alternate label is only maintained  
to support legacy configurations and tools.


Zach

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Add an IP alias to ethernet interface

2007-06-07 Thread M.Canales.es
El Jueves, 7 de Junio de 2007 05:00, Bryan Kadzban escribió:
> this list whose address isn't resolving again.  It seems like it's
> taking these messages about a half hour to get delivered.  The message
> I'm replying to was sent at 21:42 EDT, but wasn't delivered to my mail
> server until 22:04 EDT.  Might be worth double-checking out what's going
> on with postfix.)
>

That's a recurring problem not solved yet :-/

http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-April/059300.html


-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:   http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:   http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Add an IP alias to ethernet interface

2007-06-07 Thread Bryan Kadzban
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Andrew Beverley wrote:
> Therefore, you can just add the few lines of code that deal with an
> alias argument into the existing ip4-static.

Oh, duh.  You're right, this would work.

> True, but I still find myself using ifconfig because it's easier to 
> remember the syntax :-)

I would say that it's easier for me to remember ip's syntax: there
aren't tons of options, for instance.  I think it's just inertia.

(I didn't use iproute2 for a while, myself, even after the book started
installing it.  But once I started using it, it got a lot easier than I
remember ifconfig being.)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGZ+bsS5vET1Wea5wRA5Z0AKCKOT5YB9SVFz9xHDuc5+8vFrU4uwCgm5Jl
Dj4vBr7dkAKE5kO14b1lUZY=
=cYWx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page