Re: LFS is now using the new stylesheets
El Viernes, 6 de Julio de 2007 01:21, Dan Nicholson escribió: > +ifdef V > +Q = > +else > +Q = @ > +endif > + Yea, I saw something like that on the BusyBox makefiles the other day. Looks good to me. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Util-linux-ng
Matthew Burgess wrote: > > Yeah, I saw this too. It's not the most popular of changes though (see > http://www.mail-archive.com/util-linux-ng%40vger.kernel.org/msg00350.html and > David Miller's reply). So, we might see a package agnostic filesystem > detection library, possibly even before util-linux-2.13 is out. Anyway, I > agree - from the comments and patches I've seen from a brief glance at the > mailing list archives for util-linux-ng, that package has been in need of a > lot of TLC for a long time now so we'd do well to pick up the new releases > > I like the suggestion in this email about creating a general library for detecting filesystem types. something e2fsprogs / udev / util-linux can all use. It'll be interesting to see where this goes. http://www.mail-archive.com/util-linux-ng%40vger.kernel.org/msg00368.html -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: time for syslog-ng? (was Re: klogd)
Dan Nicholson wrote: > I just read that Fedora has decided to take the plunge and replace > sysklogd as their default syslog. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue94#head-f55df1c4e39b27afc053b435a85088e5aec25a84 > > Anyway, they've decided to use rsyslog since it maintains a compatible > interface to sysklogd and the conf file wouldn't have to change. > > http://www.rsyslog.com/ > > I haven't looked into it yet, but it seems promising and active. Indeed, but IMHO some of the Fedora rationale is questionable ie: "dead upstream" is not quite true. That is, if you can believe the sysklogd maintainer :-) http://lists.infodrom.org/infodrom-sysklogd/2007/0011.html Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
