Re: [lfs-dev] Promote JS78.8.0 for 10.1 ?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 02:55:50PM -0600, Douglas R. Reno via lfs-dev wrote: > > On 2/24/21 12:13 PM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:48:05AM +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > > I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been > > > > > offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0. > > > > > > > > > > Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security > > > > > fixes, just one or two lines of python got changed. But > > > > > firefox-78.8.0 does contain the usual crop of fixes rated as 'high'. > > > > > > > > > > Firefox has not yet been tagged, so no problem. > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to promote JS-78.8.0 for 10.1 so that we continue to use > > > > > the same version of the tarball. Although I have not yet built this > > > > > version of firefox on 10.1, I have built and measured on a system > > > > > from 6th February with various later updates, and I've now got JS > > > > > 78.8.0 running on two machines which have not yet got as far as > > > > > firefox. > > > > FWIIW, js78 is a dependency of: > > > > - polkit: tagged > > > > - gjs: not tagged yet > > > > > > > > According to Xi Ruoyao, nothing dependent on polkit uses js. I'd say we > > > > need to test gjs (not tagged yet), and its dependencies (g-ir > > > > (optional), gnome-shell, libsecret (optional), gnome-maps, and gnome- > > > > weather) > > > > > > > > Pierre > > > > > > > I've built polkit as part of my normal builds, as well as > > > gobject-introspection. I normally build very little of gnome. > > > > > Question: were those tested before JS78.7.1 was tagged ? > > > > I see that Doug has been given the ticket for JS, I'll temporarily > > separate the entities to keep JS at 78.7.1. > > > > ĸen > > Hi folks, > > I've tested js78 with the following results: > > [ js-78.8.0: > - gobject-introspection: GOOD > - gjs: GOOD > - libsecret: GOOD > - gnome-shell: GOOD > - gnome-maps: GOOD > - gnome-weather: GOOD > - polkit: GOOD (PASS: polkitbackendjsauthoritytest-wrapper.py) > ] > > > Everything looks good over here in that regard, so I'm going to proceed with > backporting. > > Here's my intentions for the rest of the day (and tomorrow): > > - Tag x7driver-nouveau, x7driver-ati, x7-driver-synaptics, dovecot, lxdm > > - Backport Node.JS and Nano to 10.1, and rebuild > Firefox+Seamonkey+Thunderbird to verify no breakage. > > > Please do not tag LXDM, it has been tested on systemd in several years now > and I'd like to make sure that it functions properly. > > ATI / Synaptics won't happen until tomorrow at the earliest, latest on > Saturday. Nouveau might happen tonight, it depends on whether I want to go > under my desk and chuck an NVIDIA card into my dev system tonight or not :-) > > > - Doug > I had held off tagging r600 in the belief it was maybe related to the gnome/sysv ticket you've now pushed to 10.2. But it's working fine on my box which has an r600. Could tag it if you want, and maybe give you more time to look at lxdm on systemd if that still concerns you ? ĸen -- When someone told me I lived in a fantasy land I nearly fell off my unicorn. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] Promote JS78.8.0 for 10.1 ?
On 2/24/21 12:13 PM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:48:05AM +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0. Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security fixes, just one or two lines of python got changed. But firefox-78.8.0 does contain the usual crop of fixes rated as 'high'. Firefox has not yet been tagged, so no problem. I'd like to promote JS-78.8.0 for 10.1 so that we continue to use the same version of the tarball. Although I have not yet built this version of firefox on 10.1, I have built and measured on a system from 6th February with various later updates, and I've now got JS 78.8.0 running on two machines which have not yet got as far as firefox. FWIIW, js78 is a dependency of: - polkit: tagged - gjs: not tagged yet According to Xi Ruoyao, nothing dependent on polkit uses js. I'd say we need to test gjs (not tagged yet), and its dependencies (g-ir (optional), gnome-shell, libsecret (optional), gnome-maps, and gnome- weather) Pierre I've built polkit as part of my normal builds, as well as gobject-introspection. I normally build very little of gnome. Question: were those tested before JS78.7.1 was tagged ? I see that Doug has been given the ticket for JS, I'll temporarily separate the entities to keep JS at 78.7.1. ĸen Hi folks, I've tested js78 with the following results: [ js-78.8.0: - gobject-introspection: GOOD - gjs: GOOD - libsecret: GOOD - gnome-shell: GOOD - gnome-maps: GOOD - gnome-weather: GOOD - polkit: GOOD (PASS: polkitbackendjsauthoritytest-wrapper.py) ] Everything looks good over here in that regard, so I'm going to proceed with backporting. Here's my intentions for the rest of the day (and tomorrow): - Tag x7driver-nouveau, x7driver-ati, x7-driver-synaptics, dovecot, lxdm - Backport Node.JS and Nano to 10.1, and rebuild Firefox+Seamonkey+Thunderbird to verify no breakage. Please do not tag LXDM, it has been tested on systemd in several years now and I'd like to make sure that it functions properly. ATI / Synaptics won't happen until tomorrow at the earliest, latest on Saturday. Nouveau might happen tonight, it depends on whether I want to go under my desk and chuck an NVIDIA card into my dev system tonight or not :-) - Doug -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] Promote JS78.8.0 for 10.1 ?
On 2/24/21 12:13 PM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:48:05AM +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0. Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security fixes, just one or two lines of python got changed. But firefox-78.8.0 does contain the usual crop of fixes rated as 'high'. Firefox has not yet been tagged, so no problem. I'd like to promote JS-78.8.0 for 10.1 so that we continue to use the same version of the tarball. Although I have not yet built this version of firefox on 10.1, I have built and measured on a system from 6th February with various later updates, and I've now got JS 78.8.0 running on two machines which have not yet got as far as firefox. FWIIW, js78 is a dependency of: - polkit: tagged - gjs: not tagged yet According to Xi Ruoyao, nothing dependent on polkit uses js. I'd say we need to test gjs (not tagged yet), and its dependencies (g-ir (optional), gnome-shell, libsecret (optional), gnome-maps, and gnome- weather) Pierre I've built polkit as part of my normal builds, as well as gobject-introspection. I normally build very little of gnome. Question: were those tested before JS78.7.1 was tagged ? In my case they were tested after JS78.7.1 was tagged -- Bruce I see that Doug has been given the ticket for JS, I'll temporarily separate the entities to keep JS at 78.7.1. ĸen -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] Promote JS78.8.0 for 10.1 ?
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:48:05AM +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > > > I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been > > > offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0. > > > > > > Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security > > > fixes, just one or two lines of python got changed. But > > > firefox-78.8.0 does contain the usual crop of fixes rated as 'high'. > > > > > > Firefox has not yet been tagged, so no problem. > > > > > > I'd like to promote JS-78.8.0 for 10.1 so that we continue to use > > > the same version of the tarball. Although I have not yet built this > > > version of firefox on 10.1, I have built and measured on a system > > > from 6th February with various later updates, and I've now got JS > > > 78.8.0 running on two machines which have not yet got as far as > > > firefox. > > > > FWIIW, js78 is a dependency of: > > - polkit: tagged > > - gjs: not tagged yet > > > > According to Xi Ruoyao, nothing dependent on polkit uses js. I'd say we > > need to test gjs (not tagged yet), and its dependencies (g-ir > > (optional), gnome-shell, libsecret (optional), gnome-maps, and gnome- > > weather) > > > > Pierre > > > > I've built polkit as part of my normal builds, as well as > gobject-introspection. I normally build very little of gnome. > Question: were those tested before JS78.7.1 was tagged ? I see that Doug has been given the ticket for JS, I'll temporarily separate the entities to keep JS at 78.7.1. ĸen -- When someone told me I lived in a fantasy land I nearly fell off my unicorn. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] Promote JS78.8.0 for 10.1 ?
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > > I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been > > offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0. > > > > Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security > > fixes, just one or two lines of python got changed. But > > firefox-78.8.0 does contain the usual crop of fixes rated as 'high'. > > > > Firefox has not yet been tagged, so no problem. > > > > I'd like to promote JS-78.8.0 for 10.1 so that we continue to use > > the same version of the tarball. Although I have not yet built this > > version of firefox on 10.1, I have built and measured on a system > > from 6th February with various later updates, and I've now got JS > > 78.8.0 running on two machines which have not yet got as far as > > firefox. > > FWIIW, js78 is a dependency of: > - polkit: tagged > - gjs: not tagged yet > > According to Xi Ruoyao, nothing dependent on polkit uses js. I'd say we > need to test gjs (not tagged yet), and its dependencies (g-ir > (optional), gnome-shell, libsecret (optional), gnome-maps, and gnome- > weather) > > Pierre > I've built polkit as part of my normal builds, as well as gobject-introspection. I normally build very little of gnome. ĸen -- When someone told me I lived in a fantasy land I nearly fell off my unicorn. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] Promote JS78.8.0 for 10.1 ?
On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been > offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0. > > Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security > fixes, just one or two lines of python got changed. But > firefox-78.8.0 does contain the usual crop of fixes rated as 'high'. > > Firefox has not yet been tagged, so no problem. > > I'd like to promote JS-78.8.0 for 10.1 so that we continue to use > the same version of the tarball. Although I have not yet built this > version of firefox on 10.1, I have built and measured on a system > from 6th February with various later updates, and I've now got JS > 78.8.0 running on two machines which have not yet got as far as > firefox. FWIIW, js78 is a dependency of: - polkit: tagged - gjs: not tagged yet According to Xi Ruoyao, nothing dependent on polkit uses js. I'd say we need to test gjs (not tagged yet), and its dependencies (g-ir (optional), gnome-shell, libsecret (optional), gnome-maps, and gnome- weather) Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-dev] Promote JS78.8.0 for 10.1 ?
I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0. Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security fixes, just one or two lines of python got changed. But firefox-78.8.0 does contain the usual crop of fixes rated as 'high'. Firefox has not yet been tagged, so no problem. I'd like to promote JS-78.8.0 for 10.1 so that we continue to use the same version of the tarball. Although I have not yet built this version of firefox on 10.1, I have built and measured on a system from 6th February with various later updates, and I've now got JS 78.8.0 running on two machines which have not yet got as far as firefox. ĸen -- When someone told me I lived in a fantasy land I nearly fell off my unicorn. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
