[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63315] sign windows binaries during build
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315 Mat M changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Mat M --- Fixed by cloph in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/9176, so windows signing depends on slowcheck. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63315] sign windows binaries during build
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315 David Tardon changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from David Tardon --- (In reply to comment #3) > Fixed by cloph in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/9176, so windows signing > depends on slowcheck. That was not the goal of this Easy Hack--that that problem would be fixed as well (and I mean really fixed, not just postponed) was just a side effect. Since we agreed not to do this -> WONTFIX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63315] sign windows binaries during build
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315 David Tardon changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||EasyHack DifficultyBeginner ||TopicCleanup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63315] sign windows binaries during build
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315 Andras Timar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63315] sign windows binaries during build
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315 Björn Michaelsen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice@lists.freedeskt ||op.org --- Comment #1 from Björn Michaelsen --- adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved EasyHacks for better visibility. see e.g. http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/minutes-of-ESC-call-td4076214.html for details -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63315] sign windows binaries during build
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315 Christian Lohmaier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lohma...@gmx.de --- Comment #2 from Christian Lohmaier --- This one has been fixed already. (signing the msi during the build was an extra step, but http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=125769a4a15cf6f4b9ef9d0e757ac55bd9e26509 made that part of the build) Now for signing the dlls right after they are created: I don't think this is a good idea, in fact IMHO it is a rather bad idea. Creating processes in windows is slow as fu^Whell, so anything that can be grouped into one invocation, should be grouped into one invocation. The build is already slowed down so much by all those "I built a file, so I need to touch a marker-file" stuff and copying every bit individually instead of copying whole directory trees... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs